0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An update on one-dose HPV vaccine studies, immunobridging and humoral immune responses – A meeting report

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Clinical trial subjects followed up for up to 10 years after receiving one dose HPV vaccine show stable antibody levels.

          • One dose vaccine efficacy against vaccine-type incidence persistent infection in India and Costa Rica cohorts is > 80%.

          • Further study is needed for one-dose HPV vaccination in HIV + individuals, but it shouldn’t delay general adoption.

          • HPV vaccine immune response plateaus at 24 months. Studies with 24 + months follow-up are needed for accurate comparison.

          • Anchored International Standards for 9 HPV vaccine genotypes will facilitate immunogenicity reporting and assay optimisation.

          Abstract

          The 12th HPV Prevention and Control meeting was held on June 2–3, 2022, in Antwerp, Belgium. This technical meeting focused on several topics. This report summarises the discussions and lessons learned on two topics: an update on one-dose HPV vaccination studies and humoral immune responses upon HPV vaccination. Long-term follow-up studies from Costa Rica (eleven years) and India (ten years) report stable levels of antibodies after a single HPV vaccination. High vaccine effectiveness against incident persistent HPV 16/18 infection was seen in India (95.4%, 85.0–99.9) ten years postvaccination and in Kenya (97.5%, 81.7–99.7) eighteen months postvaccination, an important observation in a setting with a higher HPV prevalence. The potential impact of HPV vaccination using a one-dose schedule in India was modelled and showed that implementation of one-dose schedule can contribute towards achieving WHO Cervical Cancer elimination goals. These data support the WHO SAGE recommendations for adopting a one-dose schedule for females aged 9–20 years. Immunobridging studies were discussed during the meeting. General agreement was reached that when thoughtfully applied, they can support and accelerate the expanded use of HPV vaccine with new vaccine schedules, age cohorts, or vaccine formulations. Internationally standardised measurements of HPV immune responses important for the progress of HPV vaccinology field. Humoral immune responses upon HPV vaccination plateau at 24 months regardless of number of doses, therefore, data should be analysed after at least 24 months of follow-up to bridge studies accurately.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Immune responses to human papillomavirus.

          The immune system uses innate and adaptive immunity to recognize and combat foreign agents that invade the body, but these methods are sometimes ineffective against human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV has several mechanisms for avoiding the immune system. HPV infects, and multiplies in keratinocytes, which are distant from immune centers and have a naturally short lifespan. The naturally short life cycle of the keratinocyte circumvents the need for the virus to destroy the cell, which would trigger inflammation and immune response. In addition, HPV downregulates the expression of interferon genes. Despite viral immune evasion, the immune system effectively repels most HPV infections, and is associated with strong localized cell mediated immune responses. New prophylactic L1 virus-like protein vaccines for HPV 16 and 18 and HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 are in phase 3 trials. Available data suggests that these vaccines are safe, produce high levels of antibodies, and are effective at preventing HPV infection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A review of clinical trials of human papillomavirus prophylactic vaccines.

            End of study analyses of the phase III trials of prophylactic human papillomavirus (HPV) virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines in young women are now largely completed. Two distinct vaccines were evaluated, Gardasil(®) (Merck & Co., Whitehouse Station, NJ USA) a quadrivalent vaccine containing VLPs of types 6, 11, 16 and 18 and Cervarix(®) (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium), a bivalent vaccine containing VLPs of types 16 and 18. Both vaccines exhibited excellent safety and immunogenicity profiles. The vaccines also demonstrated remarkably high and similar efficacy against the vaccine-targeted types for a range of cervical endpoints from persistent infection to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) in women naïve to the corresponding type at the time of vaccination. However, protection from incident infection or disease from non-vaccine types was restricted, and the vaccines had no effect on prevalent infection or disease. Gardasil(®) also demonstrated strong protection against genital warts and vulvar/vaginal neoplasia associated with the vaccine types. In other trials, Gardasil(®) protected mid-adult women from incident infection and CIN caused by the vaccine types and protected men for incident infection, genital warts and anal intraepithelial neoplasia by the vaccine types. Cervarix(®) protected against vaccine-targeted anal infections in women in an end of study evaluation. For practical reasons, efficacy studies have not been conducted in the primary target populations of current vaccination programs, adolescent girls and boys. However, immunogenicity bridging studies demonstrating excellent safety and strong immune responses in adolescence, coupled with the documentation of durable antibody responses and protection in young adults, leads to an optimistic projection of the effectiveness of the vaccines in adolescent vaccination programs. Taken together, the excellent clinical trial results strongly support the potential of the vaccines as high value public health interventions and justify their widespread implementation to prevent anogenital HPV infections and their associated neoplasia. This article forms part of a special supplement entitled "Comprehensive Control of HPV Infections and Related Diseases" Vaccine Volume 30, Supplement 5, 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Accuracy of urinary human papillomavirus testing for presence of cervical HPV: systematic review and meta-analysis

              Objective To determine the accuracy of testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in urine in detecting cervical HPV in sexually active women. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Searches of electronic databases from inception until December 2013, checks of reference lists, manual searches of recent issues of relevant journals, and contact with experts. Eligibility criteria Test accuracy studies in sexually active women that compared detection of urine HPV DNA with detection of cervical HPV DNA. Data extraction and synthesis Data relating to patient characteristics, study context, risk of bias, and test accuracy. 2×2 tables were constructed and synthesised by bivariate mixed effects meta-analysis. Results 16 articles reporting on 14 studies (1443 women) were eligible for meta-analysis. Most used commercial polymerase chain reaction methods on first void urine samples. Urine detection of any HPV had a pooled sensitivity of 87% (95% confidence interval 78% to 92%) and specificity of 94% (95% confidence interval 82% to 98%). Urine detection of high risk HPV had a pooled sensitivity of 77% (68% to 84%) and specificity of 88% (58% to 97%). Urine detection of HPV 16 and 18 had a pooled sensitivity of 73% (56% to 86%) and specificity of 98% (91% to 100%). Metaregression revealed an increase in sensitivity when urine samples were collected as first void compared with random or midstream (P=0.004). Limitations The major limitations of this review are the lack of a strictly uniform method for the detection of HPV in urine and the variation in accuracy between individual studies. Conclusions Testing urine for HPV seems to have good accuracy for the detection of cervical HPV, and testing first void urine samples is more accurate than random or midstream sampling. When cervical HPV detection is considered difficult in particular subgroups, urine testing should be regarded as an acceptable alternative.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Prev Med Rep
                Preventive Medicine Reports
                2211-3355
                14 August 2023
                October 2023
                14 August 2023
                : 35
                : 102368
                Affiliations
                [a ]Centre for Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
                [b ]Karolinska Institutet, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Huddinge, Sweden
                [c ]International Agency for Research on Cancer, Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch Lyon, France
                [d ]German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Tumorvirus-Specific Vaccination Strategies, Heidelberg, Germany
                [e ]Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
                [f ]Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
                [g ]Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [h ]P95 Epidemiology & Pharmacovigilance, Leuven, Belgium
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Drie Eikenstraat 663, 2650 Edegem, Belgium. alex.vorsters@ 123456uantwerpen.be
                Article
                S2211-3355(23)00259-0 102368
                10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102368
                10480621
                37680853
                6fe7bd0a-2456-4675-91ee-5392342cca7b
                © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/).

                History
                : 21 April 2023
                : 9 August 2023
                : 13 August 2023
                Categories
                Regular Article

                human papilloma virus,vaccination,schedule,one dose,immunobridging,humoral immune responses,clinical trials,meeting report

                Comments

                Comment on this article