Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Reconsidering sex-based stereotypes of COPD

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has historically been considered a disease of older, white, male smokers, as illustrated in Frank Netter's classic images of the ‘pink puffer’ and ‘blue bloater’. However, women may be more susceptible to COPD than men, and the disease course may be reflective of that increased susceptibility. From a review of epidemiological data of COPD, we found differences in the way men and women present with COPD symptoms, a bias in the way COPD symptoms are treated in men and women, and differences in susceptibility to airway obstruction based on age, sex, and smoking history. These data show that classic stereotypes of COPD — including male predominance — should be abandoned, and that there are not two but multiple COPD phenotypes, which are characterised by differences between women and men in susceptibility, symptoms, and disease progression. These differences impact on physician perception. Although further research into this concept is needed, the differences we found should prompt, in the short term, changes in the way (and in whom) COPD is evaluated, diagnosed, and treated; in the long term, these differences should prompt research into the prognosis of COPD based on sex differences.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Prim Care Respir J
          Prim Care Respir J
          Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group
          Nature Publishing Group
          1471-4418
          1475-1534
          December 2011
          16 September 2011
          : 20
          : 4
          : 370-378
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Section on Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Immunologic Diseases, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard , Winston Salem, NC, USA
          [2 ] Department of Family Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine , Los Angeles, CA, USA
          [3 ] Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, NC, USA
          Author notes
          [* ] Section on Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Immunologic Disease, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard , Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, USA. Tel: +1 336 716 8426 Fax: +1 336 716 7277 E-mail: johar@ 123456wfubmc.edu

          Dr Ohar performed the research and literature search, wrote the first draft, and led the manuscript review process. Dr Fromer served as a co-author and provided original content as well as editorial review of the content of this paper. Dr Donohue participated in the writing, research and literature search as well as the manuscript review process.

          Article
          PMC6549880 PMC6549880 6549880 pcrj201170
          10.4104/pcrj.2011.00070
          6549880
          21922124
          6ffd9fec-ee0c-4e4c-a8c9-ad8265df083c
          Copyright © 2011 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK
          History
          : 07 October 2010
          : 19 January 2011
          : 14 April 2011
          : 07 May 2011
          Categories
          Clinical Review

          male,stereotypes,gender,COPD,phenotypes,sex,female
          male, stereotypes, gender, COPD, phenotypes, sex, female

          Comments

          Comment on this article