Adult sex differences on a decision-making task previously shown to depend on the orbital prefrontal cortex.

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Monkeys and children show sex differences on tasks that depend on the orbital prefrontal cortex. To determine whether similar sex differences exist across the life span, adults were tested on an orbital-dependent decision-making task, the Iowa Card Task, as well as on a control task, the California Weather Task. In addition, estradiol, progesterone, and testosterone were assayed. The 6 groups of participants were college-age men, older men, young low-hormone (menstruating) women, young high-hormone (midluteal) women, older postmenopausal women on estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), and older postmenopausal women not on ERT. Results showed a male superiority on the Iowa Card Task. Among college-age men there was a negative correlation between performance and testosterone levels. There were no significant differences among groups of women on the card task. There were no significant sex differences or hormone correlations on the California Weather Task.

Related collections

Most cited references 33

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy.

A Bechara, H. Damasio, D. Tranel … (1997)

Deciding advantageously in a complex situation is thought to require overt reasoning on declarative knowledge, namely, on facts pertaining to premises, options for action, and outcomes of actions that embody the pertinent previous experience. An alternative possibility was investigated: that overt reasoning is preceded by a nonconscious biasing step that uses neural systems other than those that support declarative knowledge. Normal participants and patients with prefrontal damage and decision-making defects performed a gambling task in which behavioral, psychophysiological, and self-account measures were obtained in parallel. Normals began to choose advantageously before they realized which strategy worked best, whereas prefrontal patients continued to choose disadvantageously even after they knew the correct strategy. Moreover, normals began to generate anticipatory skin conductance responses (SCRs) whenever they pondered a choice that turned out to be risky, before they knew explicitly that it was a risky choice, whereas patients never developed anticipatory SCRs, although some eventually realized which choices were risky. The results suggest that, in normal individuals, nonconscious biases guide behavior before conscious knowledge does. Without the help of such biases, overt knowledge may be insufficient to ensure advantageous behavior.

0 comments Cited 559 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making.

Antoine Bechara, Hanna Damasio, Antonio R. Damasio … (1999)

The somatic marker hypothesis proposes that decision-making is a process that depends on emotion. Studies have shown that damage of the ventromedial prefrontal (VMF) cortex precludes the ability to use somatic (emotional) signals that are necessary for guiding decisions in the advantageous direction. However, given the role of the amygdala in emotional processing, we asked whether amygdala damage also would interfere with decision-making. Furthermore, we asked whether there might be a difference between the roles that the amygdala and VMF cortex play in decision-making. To address these two questions, we studied a group of patients with bilateral amygdala, but not VMF, damage and a group of patients with bilateral VMF, but not amygdala, damage. We used the "gambling task" to measure decision-making performance and electrodermal activity (skin conductance responses, SCR) as an index of somatic state activation. All patients, those with amygdala damage as well as those with VMF damage, were (1) impaired on the gambling task and (2) unable to develop anticipatory SCRs while they pondered risky choices. However, VMF patients were able to generate SCRs when they received a reward or a punishment (play money), whereas amygdala patients failed to do so. In a Pavlovian conditioning experiment the VMF patients acquired a conditioned SCR to visual stimuli paired with an aversive loud sound, whereas amygdala patients failed to do so. The results suggest that amygdala damage is associated with impairment in decision-making and that the roles played by the amygdala and VMF in decision-making are different.

0 comments Cited 311 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts.

R. Dias, T. W. Robbins, A Roberts (1996)

The prefrontal cortex is implicated in such human characteristics as volition, planning, abstract reasoning and affect. Frontal-lobe damage can cause disinhibition such that the behaviour of a subject is guided by previously acquired responses that are inappropriate to the current situation. Here we demonstrate that disinhibition, or a loss of inhibitory control, can be selective for particular cognitive functions and that different regions of the prefrontal cortex provide inhibitory control in different aspects of cognitive processing. Thus, whereas damage to the lateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann's area 9) in monkeys causes a loss of inhibitory control in attentional selection, damage to the orbito-frontal cortex in monkeys causes a loss of inhibitory control in 'affective' processing, thereby impairing the ability to alter behaviour in response to fluctuations in the emotional significance of stimuli. These findings not only support the view that the prefrontal cortex has multiple functions, but also provide evidence for the distribution of different cognitive functions within specific regions of prefrontal cortex.