10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy with custom foot orthotics in plantar fasciitis treatment: A prospective randomized one-year follow-up study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose:

          Plantar fasciitis (PF) is characterized by the degeneration of the plantar fascia, leading to heel pain. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and custom foot orthotics (CFO).

          Method:

          The study was planned as a prospective randomized controlled study. In total, 83 patients were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups: patients treated with ESWT (group I, n=40) and patients treated with CFO (group II, n=43). Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain in the morning, evening, at rest and while walking. Foot Function Index (FFI) was used to evaluate foot functions, and Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) was used to evaluate foot health.

          Results:

          Both group I and group II achieved significant improvements in our evaluation parameters (morning and evening pain) at 4, 12 and 24 weeks compared with their baseline values (P<0.001), and significant improvement observed in the group II continued at 48 weeks (P<0.05); however, there was no significant difference in some parameters in the group I after treatment compared with their baseline values (P>0.05).

          Conclusion:

          Both treatment ESWT and CFO can use interchangebably. Neither method was superior in treating plantar fasciitis

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries.

          To provide an extensive and up to date database for specific running related injuries, across the sexes, as seen at a primary care sports medicine facility, and to assess the relative risk for individual injuries based on investigation of selected risk factors. Patient data were recorded by doctors at the Allan McGavin Sports Medicine Centre over a two year period. They included assessment of anthropometric, training, and biomechanical information. A model was constructed (with odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals) of possible contributing factors using a dependent variable of runners with a specific injury and comparing them with a control group of runners who experienced a different injury. Variables included in the model were: height, weight, body mass index, age, activity history, weekly activity, history of injury, and calibre of runner. Most of the study group were women (54%). Some injuries occurred with a significantly higher frequency in one sex. Being less than 34 years old was reported as a risk factor across the sexes for patellofemoral pain syndrome, and in men for iliotibial band friction syndrome, patellar tendinopathy, and tibial stress syndrome. Being active for less than 8.5 years was positively associated with injury in both sexes for tibial stress syndrome; and women with a body mass index less than 21 kg/m(2) were at a significantly higher risk for tibial stress fractures and spinal injuries. Patellofemoral pain syndrome was the most common injury, followed by iliotibial band friction syndrome, plantar fasciitis, meniscal injuries of the knee, and tibial stress syndrome. Although various risk factors were shown to be positively associated with a risk for, or protection from, specific injuries, future research should include a non-injured control group and a more precise measure of weekly running distance and running experience to validate these results.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical practice. Plantar fasciitis.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effectiveness of foot orthoses to treat plantar fasciitis: a randomized trial.

              Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common foot complaints. It is often treated with foot orthoses; however, studies of the effects of orthoses are generally of poor quality, and to our knowledge, no trials have investigated long-term effectiveness. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness of foot orthoses in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. A pragmatic, participant-blinded, randomized trial was conducted from April 1999 to July 2001. The duration of follow-up for each participant was 12 months. One hundred and thirty-five participants with plantar fasciitis from the local community were recruited to a university-based clinic and were randomly allocated to receive a sham orthosis (soft, thin foam), a prefabricated orthosis (firm foam), or a customized orthosis (semirigid plastic). After 3 months of treatment, estimates of effects on pain and function favored the prefabricated and customized orthoses over the sham orthoses, although only the effects on function were statistically significant. Compared with sham orthoses, the mean pain score (scale, 0-100) was 8.7 points better for the prefabricated orthoses (95% confidence interval, -0.1 to 17.6; P = .05) and 7.4 points better for the customized orthoses (95% confidence interval, -1.4 to 16.2; P = .10). Compared with sham orthoses, the mean function score (scale, 0-100) was 8.4 points better for the prefabricated orthoses (95% confidence interval, 1.0-15.8; P = .03) and 7.5 points better for the customized orthoses (95% confidence interval, 0.3-14.7; P = .04). There were no significant effects on primary outcomes at the 12-month review. Foot orthoses produce small short-term benefits in function and may also produce small reductions in pain for people with plantar fasciitis, but they do not have long-term beneficial effects compared with a sham device. The customized and prefabricated orthoses used in this trial have similar effectiveness in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact
                J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact
                Journal of Musculoskeletal & Neuronal Interactions
                International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions (Greece )
                1108-7161
                2019
                : 19
                : 2
                : 178-186
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Dr Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
                [2 ]Dicle University Medical School Prosthetics and Orthotics Department, Diyarbakır, Turkey
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Sibel Çağlar Okur, Cami Yanı Sokak Bahar Konakları A Blok Daire 23, Turkey E-mail: sibelcaglarokur@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                JMNI-19-178
                6587088
                31186388
                710669b9-d02c-4423-8b37-36532c3c3970
                Copyright: © Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 19 January 2019
                Categories
                Original Article

                plantar fasciitis,eswt,cfo insoles,foot pain
                plantar fasciitis, eswt, cfo insoles, foot pain

                Comments

                Comment on this article