7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Online Adaptation to Altered Auditory Feedback Is Predicted by Auditory Acuity and Not by Domain-General Executive Control Resources

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          When a speaker's auditory feedback is altered, he adapts for the perturbation by altering his own production, which demonstrates the role of auditory feedback in speech motor control. In the present study, we explored the role of auditory acuity and executive control in this process. Based on the DIVA model and the major cognitive control models, we expected that higher auditory acuity, and better executive control skills would predict larger adaptation to the alteration. Thirty-six Spanish native speakers performed an altered auditory feedback experiment, executive control (numerical Stroop, Simon and Flanker) tasks, and auditory acuity tasks (loudness, pitch, and melody pattern discrimination). In the altered feedback experiment, participants had to produce the pseudoword “pep” (/pep/) while perceiving their auditory feedback in real time through earphones. The auditory feedback was first unaltered and then progressively altered in F1 and F2 dimensions until maximal alteration (F1 −150 Hz; F2 +300 Hz). The normalized distance of maximal adaptation ranged from 4 to 137 Hz (median of 75 ± 36). The different measures of auditory acuity were significant predictors of adaptation, while individual measures of cognitive function skills (obtained from the executive control tasks) were not. Better auditory discriminators adapted more to the alteration. We conclude that adaptation to altered auditory feedback is very well-predicted by general auditory acuity, as suggested by the DIVA model. In line with the framework of motor-control models, no specific claim on the implication of executive resources in speech motor control can be made.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions.

          Executive functions (EFs)-a set of general-purpose control processes that regulate one's thoughts and behaviors-have become a popular research topic lately and have been studied in many subdisciplines of psychological science. This article summarizes the EF research that our group has conducted to understand the nature of individual differences in EFs and their cognitive and biological underpinnings. In the context of a new theoretical framework that we have been developing (the unity/diversity framework), we describe four general conclusions that have emerged from our research. Specifically, we argue that individual differences in EFs, as measured with simple laboratory tasks, (1) show both unity and diversity (different EFs are correlated yet separable); (2) reflect substantial genetic contributions; (3) are related to various clinically and societally important phenomena; and (4) show some developmental stability.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: computational basis and neural organization.

            Sensorimotor integration is an active domain of speech research and is characterized by two main ideas, that the auditory system is critically involved in speech production and that the motor system is critically involved in speech perception. Despite the complementarity of these ideas, there is little crosstalk between these literatures. We propose an integrative model of the speech-related "dorsal stream" in which sensorimotor interaction primarily supports speech production, in the form of a state feedback control architecture. A critical component of this control system is forward sensory prediction, which affords a natural mechanism for limited motor influence on perception, as recent perceptual research has suggested. Evidence shows that this influence is modulatory but not necessary for speech perception. The neuroanatomy of the proposed circuit is discussed as well as some probable clinical correlates including conduction aphasia, stuttering, and aspects of schizophrenia. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front. Hum. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5161
                12 March 2018
                2018
                : 12
                : 91
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language , San Sebastian, Spain
                [2] 2IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science , Bilbao, Spain
                [3] 3Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin–Madison , Madison, WI, United States
                [4] 4Facultad de Lenguas y Educación, Universidad Nebrija , Madrid, Spain
                [5] 5Department of Psychology, Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Research, University of Jyväskylä , Jyväskylä, Finland
                [6] 6Basque Language and Communication Department, University of the Basque Country , San Sebastian, Spain
                [7] 7Department of Otolaryngology, University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Xiaolin Zhou, Peking University, China

                Reviewed by: Xing Tian, New York University Shanghai, China; Matthias Franken, Ghent University, Belgium

                *Correspondence: Clara D. Martin c.martin@ 123456bcbl.eu
                Article
                10.3389/fnhum.2018.00091
                5857594
                29593516
                729b7d07-d4b2-4600-b1f0-750900be3f93
                Copyright © 2018 Martin, Niziolek, Duñabeitia, Perez, Hernandez, Carreiras and Houde.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 22 November 2017
                : 23 February 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 1, References: 83, Pages: 14, Words: 12596
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad 10.13039/501100003329
                Award ID: SEV-2015-490
                Award ID: PSI2014-54500
                Funded by: European Research Council 10.13039/501100000781
                Award ID: GA-613465- FP7-SSH-2013-1-AThEME
                Funded by: Eusko Jaurlaritza 10.13039/501100003086
                Award ID: PI_2015_1_25
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                speech production,altered feedback,adaptation,auditory acuity,executive control
                Neurosciences
                speech production, altered feedback, adaptation, auditory acuity, executive control

                Comments

                Comment on this article