43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The seed and soil hypothesis revisited--the role of tumor-stroma interactions in metastasis to different organs.

      1 ,
      International journal of cancer
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The fact that certain tumors exhibit a predilection for metastasis to specific organs has been recognized for well over a century now. An extensive body of clinical data and experimental research has confirmed Stephen Paget's original "seed and soil" hypothesis that proposed the organ-preference patterns of tumor metastasis are the product of favorable interactions between metastatic tumor cells (the "seed") and their organ microenvironment (the "soil"). Indeed, many of the first-line therapeutic regimens, currently in use for the treatment of human cancer are designed to target cancer cells (such as chemotherapy) and also to modulate the tumor microenvironment (such as antiangiogenic therapy). While some types of tumors are capable of forming metastases in virtually every organ in the body, the most frequent target organs of metastasis are bone, brain, liver and the lung. In this review, we discuss how tumor-stromal interactions influence metastasis in each of these organs.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Int J Cancer
          International journal of cancer
          Wiley
          1097-0215
          0020-7136
          Jun 01 2011
          : 128
          : 11
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Cancer Biology, Cancer Metastasis Research Center, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
          Article
          NIHMS283794
          10.1002/ijc.26031
          3075088
          21365651
          74692134-75f0-4e72-b2d3-61767c70acd0
          Copyright © 2011 UICC.
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article