2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      High replication stress and limited Rad51-mediated DNA repair capacity, but not oxidative stress, underlie oligodendrocyte precursor cell radiosensitivity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cranial irradiation is part of the standard of care for treating pediatric brain tumors. However, ionizing radiation can trigger serious long-term neurologic sequelae, including oligodendrocyte and brain white matter loss enabling neurocognitive decline in children surviving brain cancer. Oxidative stress-mediated oligodendrocyte precursor cell (OPC) radiosensitivity has been proposed as a possible explanation for this. Here, however, we demonstrate that antioxidants fail to improve OPC viability after irradiation, despite suppressing oxidative stress, suggesting an alternative etiology for OPC radiosensitivity. Using systematic approaches, we find that OPCs have higher irradiation-induced and endogenous γH2AX foci compared to neural stem cells, neurons, astrocytes and mature oligodendrocytes, and these correlate with replication-associated DNA double strand breakage. Furthermore, OPCs are reliant upon ATR kinase and Mre11 nuclease-dependent processes for viability, are more sensitive to drugs increasing replication fork collapse, and display synthetic lethality with PARP inhibitors after irradiation. This suggests an insufficiency for homology-mediated DNA repair in OPCs—a model that is supported by evidence of normal RPA but reduced RAD51 filament formation at resected lesions in irradiated OPCs. We therefore propose a DNA repair-centric mechanism of OPC radiosensitivity, involving chronically-elevated replication stress combined with ‘bottlenecks’ in RAD51-dependent DNA repair that together reduce radiation resilience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references99

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.

          Damage to our genetic material is an ongoing threat to both our ability to faithfully transmit genetic information to our offspring as well as our own survival. To respond to these threats, eukaryotes have evolved the DNA damage response (DDR). The DDR is a complex signal transduction pathway that has the ability to sense DNA damage and transduce this information to the cell to influence cellular responses to DNA damage. Cells possess an arsenal of enzymatic tools capable of remodeling and repairing DNA; however, their activities must be tightly regulated in a temporal, spatial, and DNA lesion-appropriate fashion to optimize repair and prevent unnecessary and potentially deleterious alterations in the structure of DNA during normal cellular processes. This review will focus on how the DDR controls DNA repair and the phenotypic consequences of defects in these critical regulatory functions in mammals. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Causes and consequences of replication stress.

            Replication stress is a complex phenomenon that has serious implications for genome stability, cell survival and human disease. Generation of aberrant replication fork structures containing single-stranded DNA activates the replication stress response, primarily mediated by the kinase ATR (ATM- and Rad3-related). Along with its downstream effectors, ATR stabilizes and helps to restart stalled replication forks, avoiding the generation of DNA damage and genome instability. Understanding this response may be key to diagnosing and treating human diseases caused by defective responses to replication stress.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Brain development in rodents and humans: Identifying benchmarks of maturation and vulnerability to injury across species.

              Hypoxic-ischemic and traumatic brain injuries are leading causes of long-term mortality and disability in infants and children. Although several preclinical models using rodents of different ages have been developed, species differences in the timing of key brain maturation events can render comparisons of vulnerability and regenerative capacities difficult to interpret. Traditional models of developmental brain injury have utilized rodents at postnatal day 7-10 as being roughly equivalent to a term human infant, based historically on the measurement of post-mortem brain weights during the 1970s. Here we will examine fundamental brain development processes that occur in both rodents and humans, to delineate a comparable time course of postnatal brain development across species. We consider the timing of neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, gliogenesis, oligodendrocyte maturation and age-dependent behaviors that coincide with developmentally regulated molecular and biochemical changes. In general, while the time scale is considerably different, the sequence of key events in brain maturation is largely consistent between humans and rodents. Further, there are distinct parallels in regional vulnerability as well as functional consequences in response to brain injuries. With a focus on developmental hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and traumatic brain injury, this review offers guidelines for researchers when considering the most appropriate rodent age for the developmental stage or process of interest to approximate human brain development. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                NAR Cancer
                NAR Cancer
                narcancer
                NAR Cancer
                Oxford University Press
                2632-8674
                June 2022
                12 April 2022
                12 April 2022
                : 4
                : 2
                : zcac012
                Affiliations
                Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Department of Oncology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Department of Oncology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Department of Oncology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Author notes
                To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 403 220 4896; Email: a.goodarzi@ 123456ucalgary.ca

                The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the last two authors should be regarded as Joint Senior Authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7472-2450
                Article
                zcac012
                10.1093/narcan/zcac012
                9004414
                35425901
                7564f258-6fbe-4c02-9380-57b83251f7f8
                © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of NAR Cancer.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@ 123456oup.com

                History
                : 21 March 2022
                : 15 February 2022
                : 05 September 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funded by: Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship;
                Funded by: Cumming School of Medicine Graduate Scholarship;
                Funded by: Alberta Innovates – Health Solutions Graduate Scholarship;
                Funded by: Izaak Walton Killam Pre-Doctoral Scholarship;
                Funded by: Kids Cancer Care Foundation Chair in Pediatric Oncology;
                Funded by: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, DOI 10.13039/501100000024;
                Funded by: Robson DNA Science Centre;
                Funded by: Canada Research Chairs, DOI 10.13039/501100001804;
                Categories
                AcademicSubjects/SCI00030
                AcademicSubjects/SCI00980
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01060
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01140
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01180
                DNA Damage Sensing and Repair

                Comments

                Comment on this article