12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Changes in Composition and Diversity of Epiphytic Microorganisms on Field Pea Seeds, Partial Crop Peas, and Whole Crop Peas during Maturation and Ensiling with or without Lactic Acid Bacteria Inoculant

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          The present study was conducted under the hypothesis that, in field peas, type of plant material, stage of maturity, ensiling, silage additive, and aerobic stress affect the composition and diversity of epiphytic microbial communities. Epiphytic microbial composition and diversity of pea seeds, partial crop peas, and whole crop peas was analyzed at different stages of late maturity, before and after ensiling, and with or without the use of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) as inoculant. Suitable combinations among pea crop variants, maturity stages, and inoculant use for the production of stable silages with sufficient aerobic stability after opening and during feed-out were identified. Genomic DNA was extracted, and 16S and 18S rRNA gene amplicons were sequenced. To assess the quality of the various silages, nutrient concentration, pH value, concentration of lactic acid, short chain fatty acids, and alcohols, and aerobic stability were determined. Pea seeds were barely colonized by epiphytic microorganisms. In partial and whole crop peas, composition and α-diversity (Shannon index) of bacterial communities did not differ between crop variants but differed among maturity stages. Epiphytic eukaryotes were rarely found on partial and whole crop peas. Bacterial composition and α-diversity were affected by ensiling and subsequent aerobic storage. In partial and whole crop peas, plant maturation caused an increase of the relative abundance of naturally occurring LAB ( Weissella, Pediococcus, and Lactobacillus spp.). As a possible result, natural LAB support stable ensiling conditions even without the use of inoculants beginning with a maturity of 78 on the BBCH scale. This corresponded with a dry matter (DM) concentration of 341 and 363 g/kg in partial and whole crop peas, respectively. Addition of LAB inoculants, however, reduced ammonia, acetic acid, and butanol concentrations, and supported aerobic stability. Earlier stages of plant maturity (BBCH 76 and 77, 300 g DM/kg or less) were more prone to microbial spoilage. Stable pea seed silages can be produced at a maturity between BBCH 78 (427 g DM/kg) and 79 (549 g DM/kg), but they undoubtedly require LAB inoculation or application of other ensiling agents.

          IMPORTANCE Field peas are important protein suppliers for human and animal nutrition. They can be grown in many areas of the world, which may reduce imports of protein plants and has beneficial economic and ecological effects. Ensiling is a method of preserving feed that can be implemented easily and cost-effectively at the farm. Peas harvested as seeds, partial crop, or whole crop at different maturities enable a wide range of applications. The study characterized epiphytic microbial communities on peas in terms of composition and diversity depending on the maturity of the plants and feed conservation by ensiling as they play an essential role for the production of silages. Even if this study did not consider year, site, or cultivar effects, the results would show which part of the plant is probably well suited for the production of stable and high-quality silages and at which stage of maturity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies

            16S ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) amplicon analysis remains the standard approach for the cultivation-independent investigation of microbial diversity. The accuracy of these analyses depends strongly on the choice of primers. The overall coverage and phylum spectrum of 175 primers and 512 primer pairs were evaluated in silico with respect to the SILVA 16S/18S rDNA non-redundant reference dataset (SSURef 108 NR). Based on this evaluation a selection of ‘best available’ primer pairs for Bacteria and Archaea for three amplicon size classes (100–400, 400–1000, ≥1000 bp) is provided. The most promising bacterial primer pair (S-D-Bact-0341-b-S-17/S-D-Bact-0785-a-A-21), with an amplicon size of 464 bp, was experimentally evaluated by comparing the taxonomic distribution of the 16S rDNA amplicons with 16S rDNA fragments from directly sequenced metagenomes. The results of this study may be used as a guideline for selecting primer pairs with the best overall coverage and phylum spectrum for specific applications, therefore reducing the bias in PCR-based microbial diversity studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The SILVA and “All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks

              SILVA (from Latin silva, forest, http://www.arb-silva.de) is a comprehensive resource for up-to-date quality-controlled databases of aligned ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequences from the Bacteria, Archaea and Eukaryota domains and supplementary online services. SILVA provides a manually curated taxonomy for all three domains of life, based on representative phylogenetic trees for the small- and large-subunit rRNA genes. This article describes the improvements the SILVA taxonomy has undergone in the last 3 years. Specifically we are focusing on the curation process, the various resources used for curation and the comparison of the SILVA taxonomy with Greengenes and RDP-II taxonomies. Our comparisons not only revealed a reasonable overlap between the taxa names, but also points to significant differences in both names and numbers of taxa between the three resources.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                Microbiol Spectr
                Microbiol Spectr
                spectrum
                Microbiology Spectrum
                American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
                2165-0497
                10 August 2022
                Jul-Aug 2022
                10 August 2022
                : 10
                : 4
                : e00953-22
                Affiliations
                [a ] Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberggrid.9018.0, , Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Halle (Saale), Germany
                [b ] Saxon State Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology, Köllitsch, Germany
                [c ] Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Department of Environmental Microbiology, Leipzig, Germany
                Yeungnam University
                Author notes
                [*]

                Present address: Christian Kuhnitzsch, Saxon State Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology, ISS Rötha, Zwenkau, Germany.

                [§]

                Present address: Denny Popp, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Institute of Human Genetics, Leipzig, Germany.

                The authors declare no conflict of interest.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1264-997X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8643-340X
                Article
                00953-22 spectrum.00953-22
                10.1128/spectrum.00953-22
                9431205
                35946942
                77ff633f-ac8b-4657-a818-9df7dc89b940
                Copyright © 2022 Bachmann et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

                History
                : 2 May 2022
                : 14 July 2022
                Page count
                supplementary-material: 0, Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 57, Pages: 12, Words: 7835
                Funding
                Funded by: Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100005908;
                Award ID: 2815EPS058
                Award Recipient : Award Recipient : Award Recipient : Award Recipient : Award Recipient : Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                food-microbiology, Food Microbiology
                Custom metadata
                July/August 2022

                field pea,maturity,silage quality,epiphytic bacteria,eukaryotes

                Comments

                Comment on this article