Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The evolution of genital complexity and mating rates in sexually size dimorphic spiders

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Genital diversity may arise through sexual conflict over polyandry, where male genital features function to manipulate female mating frequency against her interest. Correlated genital evolution across animal groups is consistent with this view, but a link between genital complexity and mating rates remains to be established. In sexually size dimorphic spiders, golden orbweaving spiders (Nephilidae) males mutilate their genitals to form genital plugs, but these plugs do not always prevent female polyandry. In a comparative framework, we test whether male and female genital complexity coevolve, and how these morphologies, as well as sexual cannibalism, relate to the evolution of mating systems.

          Results

          Using a combination of comparative tests, we show that male genital complexity negatively correlates with female mating rates, and that levels of sexual cannibalism negatively correlate with male mating rates. We also confirm a positive correlation between male and female genital complexity. The macroevolutionary trajectory is consistent with a repeated evolution from polyandry to monandry coinciding with the evolution towards more complex male genitals.

          Conclusions

          These results are consistent with the predictions from sexual conflict theory, although sexual conflict may not be the only mechanism responsible for the evolution of genital complexity and mating systems. Nevertheless, our comparative evidence suggests that in golden orbweavers, male genital complexity limits female mating rates, and sexual cannibalism by females coincides with monogyny.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0821-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references84

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sexual selection and genital evolution.

          Genitalia are conspicuously variable, even in closely related taxa that are otherwise morphologically very similar. Explaining genital diversity is a longstanding problem that is attracting renewed interest from evolutionary biologists. New studies provide ever more compelling evidence that sexual selection is important in driving genital divergence. Importantly, several studies now link variation in genital morphology directly to male fertilization success, and modern comparative techniques have confirmed predicted associations between genital complexity and mating patterns across species. There is also evidence that male and female genitalia can coevolve antagonistically. Determining mechanisms of genital evolution is an important challenge if we are to resolve current debate concerning the relative significance of mate choice benefits and sexual conflict in sexual selection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book Chapter: not found

            SEXUAL SELECTION AND SEXUAL CONFLICT

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sex peptide causes mating costs in female Drosophila melanogaster.

              Conflicts between females and males over reproductive decisions are common . In Drosophila, as in many other organisms, there is often a conflict over how often to mate. The mating frequency that maximizes male reproductive success is higher than that which maximizes female reproductive success . In addition, frequent mating reduces female lifespan and reproductive success , a cost that is mediated by male ejaculate accessory gland proteins (Acps) . We demonstrate here that a single Acp, the sex peptide (SP or Acp70A), which decreases female receptivity and stimulates egg production in the first matings of virgin females , is a major contributor to Acp-mediated mating costs in females. Females continuously exposed to SP-deficient males (which produce no detectable SP ) had significantly higher fitness and higher lifetime reproductive success than control females. Hence, rather than benefiting both sexes, receipt of SP decreases female fitness, making SP the first identified gene that is likely to play a central role in sexual conflict.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +38640641033 , kuntner@gmail.com
                Journal
                BMC Evol Biol
                BMC Evol. Biol
                BMC Evolutionary Biology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2148
                9 November 2016
                9 November 2016
                2016
                : 16
                : 242
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Biology, Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana, Slovenia
                [2 ]National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC USA
                [3 ]Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan
                [4 ]Zoological Institute, Biozentrum Grindel, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
                [5 ]School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010 Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0057-2178
                Article
                821
                10.1186/s12862-016-0821-y
                5103378
                26727998
                7855e647-beed-43e5-803f-152741dcaebd
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 21 September 2016
                : 28 October 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004329, Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS;
                Award ID: P1-10236
                Award ID: J1-6729
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000923, Australian Research Council;
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Evolutionary Biology
                sexual selection,sexual size dimorphism,sexual conflict,female gigantism,sexually antagonistic coevolution,nephila

                Comments

                Comment on this article