5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      ‘I’ve put diabetes completely on the shelf till the mental stuff is in place’. How patients with doctor-assessed impaired self-care perceive disease, self-care, and support from general practitioners. A qualitative study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: This paper investigated patients’ experiences of disease and self-care as well as perceptions of the general practitioner’s role in supporting patients with impaired self-care ability.

          Design: Qualitative interviews with 13 patients with type 2 diabetes, concurrent chronic diseases, and impaired self-care ability assessed by a general practitioner. We analyzed our data using systematic text condensation. The shifting perspectives model of chronic illness formed the theoretical background for the study.

          Results: Although most patients experienced challenges in adhering to recommended self-care activities, many had developed additional, personal self-care routines that increased wellbeing. Some patients were conscious of self-care trade-offs, including patients with concurrent mental disorders who were much more attentive to their mental disorder than their somatic diseases. Patients’ perspectives on diseases could shift over time and were dominated by emotional considerations such as insisting on leading a normal life or struggling with limitations caused by disease. Most patients found support in the ongoing relationship with the same general practitioner, who was valued as a companion or appreciated as a trustworthy health informant.

          Conclusion: Patient experiences of self-care may collide with what general practitioners find appropriate in a medical regimen. Health professionals should be aware of patients’ prominent and shifting considerations about the emotional aspects of disease. Patients valued the general practitioner’s role in self-care support, primarily through the long-term doctor-patient relationship. Therefore, relational continuity should be prioritized in chronic care, especially for patients with impaired self-care ability who often have a highly complex disease burden and situational context.

          Key points
          •   Little is known about the perspectives of disease and self-care in patients with a doctor-assessed impaired ability of self-care.

          •   • Although patients knew the prescribed regimen they often prioritized self-care routines that increased well-being at the cost of medical recommendations.

          •   • Shifting emotional aspects were prominent in patients’ considerations of disease and sustained GPs’ use of a patient-centred clinical method when discussing self-care.

          •   • Relational continuity with general practitioners was a highly valued support and should be prioritized for patients with impaired self-care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The patient-centred clinical method. 1. A model for the doctor-patient interaction in family medicine.

          This article describes a patient-centred clinical method appropriate for family medicine. The method is designed to attain an understanding of the patient as well as his disease. This two-fold task is described in terms of two agendas: the physician's and the patient's. The key to an understanding of the patient's agenda is the physician's receptivity to cues offered by the patient, and behaviour which encourages him to express his expectations, feelings and fears. The physician's agenda is the explanation of the patient's illness in terms of a taxonomy of disease. In the patient-centred clinical method, both agendas are addressed by the physician and any conflict between them dealt with by negotiation. This is contrasted with the disease-centred method in which only the doctor's agenda is addressed. Further articles will describe the patient-centred method in operational terms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Shifting priorities in multimorbidity: a longitudinal qualitative study of patient's prioritization of multiple conditions.

            To examine what influences self-management priorities for individuals with multiple long-term conditions and how this changes over time. A longitudinal qualitative study using semi-structured interviews completed with 21 participants with more than one chronic condition. The study demonstrates the impact of multiple conditions on many aspects of people's illness management. Narratives illuminated how individual's condition priorities changed at pivotal points and altered their engagement with self-management practices. This is influenced by contact with health professionals and how people framed illness and lifestyle changes. Medication management was a central point where individuals took control of their conditions. Additional conditions were more readily accommodated if people established a cognitive link between existing management practices. Thus, multiple conditions were not inevitably experienced as an increasing burden but subject to considerable flux and change. Prioritizing one condition over another at a particular time together with a transfer and amalgamation of practices appears to facilitate accommodation of multiple conditions and ease the burden of everyday management. These findings have implications for how we understand the variable nature of multimorbidity experience and management for patients. Clinicians might usefully engage with patients' understanding to reduce complexity, and enhance engagement of condition management.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Understanding the context of health for persons with multiple chronic conditions: moving from what is the matter to what matters.

              An isolated focus on 1 disease at a time is insufficient to generate the scientific evidence needed to improve the health of persons living with more than 1 chronic condition. This article explores how to bring context into research efforts to improve the health of persons living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Scand J Prim Health Care
                Scand J Prim Health Care
                IPRI
                ipri20
                Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
                Taylor & Francis
                0281-3432
                1502-7724
                September 2018
                22 June 2018
                : 36
                : 3
                : 342-351
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Public Health, The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark;
                [b ]Southern Køge Medical Centre , Køge, Denmark;
                [c ]Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark , Odense, Denmark;
                [d ]Zealand University Hospital , Roskilde, Denmark;
                [e ]Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark , Odense, Denmark
                Author notes
                CONTACT Mads Aage Toft Kristensen mads.kristensen@ 123456sund.ku.dk Department of Public Health, The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, University of Copenhagen , Øster Farimagsgade 5, P.O. box 2099, Copenhagen K, DK, 1014, Denmark
                Article
                1487436
                10.1080/02813432.2018.1487436
                6161682
                29929420
                797d52f9-f8b2-4338-8c47-71c014399330
                © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 April 2018
                : 02 May 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 10, Words: 7145
                Funding
                Region Zealand, Quality in General Practice (KAP-S) in Region Zealand, Intersectoral Fund for Health Services Research in Region Zealand, Committee of Multipractice Studies in General Practice, The foundation in memory of Edith and Henrik Henriksen. The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript. Views expressed in this article are those of the authors alone.
                Categories
                Research Article

                multimorbidity,chronic disease,patient acceptance of health care,general practice,self-care,continuity of patient care

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content73

                Cited by14

                Most referenced authors385