2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Initial Stroke Severity in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation According to Antithrombotic Therapy Before Ischemic Stroke

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Purpose:

          Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the leading cause of ischemic stroke. Preventive antithrombotic use, especially for anticoagulation, reduces the incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with AF. Using data from the nationwide multicenter stroke registry, we investigated the trends of preceding antithrombotic medication use in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with AF and its association with initial stroke severity and in-hospital outcomes.

          Methods:

          This study included 6786 patients with AIS with known AF before stroke admission across 39 hospitals between June 2008 and December 2018. We collected the data on antithrombotic medication use (no antithrombotic/antiplatelet/anticoagulant) preceding AIS. Initial stroke severity was measured using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and in-hospital outcome was determined by modified Rankin Scale score at discharge.

          Results:

          During the study period, anticoagulant use continued to increase. However, nearly one-third of patients with AIS with known AF did not receive antithrombotics before stroke. Initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores varied according to preceding antithrombotic therapy ( P <0.001). It was higher in patients who did not receive antithrombotics than in those who received antiplatelets or anticoagulants (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score: 8 versus 7 and 8 versus 6, respectively). Favorable outcome at discharge (modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2) was more prevalent in patients who received antiplatelets or anticoagulants ( P <0.001). Use of antiplatelets (odds ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.09–1.38]) and anticoagulants (odds ratio, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.15–1.50]) was associated with a mild initial neurological deficit (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤5) in patients with AIS with AF.

          Conclusions:

          Throughout the study period, the proportion of patients taking anticoagulants increased among patients with AIS with known AF. However, a large portion of AF patients still did not receive antithrombotics before AIS. Furthermore, prehospitalization use of anticoagulants was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of a mild initial neurological deficit and favorable outcome at discharge.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Characteristics and management of stroke in Korea: 2014-2018 data from Korean Stroke Registry.

          Lifestyle changes and evolving healthcare practices in Korea have influenced disease patterns and medical care. Since strokes have high disease burden in countries with aging populations, it is necessary to evaluate the associated recent disease characteristics and patient care patterns. The Korean Stroke Registry is a nationwide, multicenter, prospective, hospital-based stroke registry in Korea used to monitor these changes across the population.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Underuse of oral anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in Italy

            Abstract Introduction: Oral anticoagulants (OAs) are significantly more effective than Aspirin in the prevention of cerebrovascular accidents among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Several studies, however, showed OAs to be widely underused in these patients. Objective: To assess the appropriateness of antithrombotic therapy in an Italian population of AF patients. Methods: Two hundred and fifty-five consecutive patients affected by nonvalvular AF participated in the study. Data were collected on demographic characteristics, risk factors for stroke, current prophylactic therapy, and perceived or actual risk factors for bleeding. INR levels were measured. Patients were stratified by their risk for stroke (214 at high risk, 21 moderate, 20 low), and their prophylactic therapy was analysed in light of international antithrombotic therapy recommendations. After therapy adjustment, 203 of our patients were followed-up for the occurrence of cerebrovascular events for an average of 27 months. Results: Upon admission, 35% (n=75) of patients in the high-risk category were either taking no antithrombotic prophylaxis or were being treated with Aspirin. In addition, 38 of 139 patients receiving OAs had an INR<2. Thus, a total of 113 (52.8%) high-risk subjects were not receiving adequate antithrombotic therapy. Of high-risk patients not treated with OAs, 46.7% reported no perceived or actual risk factors for bleeding. The annual incidence of cerebrovascular accidents was 3.8% among 163 high-risk patients assigned to OA treatment, and 4.5% among 39 patients given Aspirin treatment. Relative to expected annual incidence rates, cerebrovascular risk in anticoagulated patients was reduced by about 70%. Conclusions: Underuse of OAs is still common in Italy, and much of it cannot be explained by the concern for haemorrhage. Support and training in the complex task of anticoagulation management may help to extend this efficacious prophylactic therapy to all patients who may benefit from it.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stroke Severity in Patients on Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants with a Standard or Insufficient Dose.

               The stroke severity or functional outcomes could differ because the efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) could be different according to the dose. We investigated whether there was any difference in the stroke outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) by their prior medication status, including standard-dosed versus under-dosed NOACs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Stroke
                Stroke
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0039-2499
                1524-4628
                September 2020
                September 2020
                : 51
                : 9
                : 2733-2741
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurology, Changwon Fatima Hospital, Changwon, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea (Y.H.J.).
                [2 ]Department of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (Y.H.J., Y.D.K., J.K., K.-Y.L.).
                [3 ]Department of Neurology, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S.W.H.).
                [4 ]Department of Neurology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, South Korea (M.S.O.).
                [5 ]Clinical Research Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.S.L.).
                [6 ]Severance Institute for Vascular and Metabolic Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (K.-Y.L.).
                Article
                10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030138
                32811392
                8004d7fa-3b88-407b-9424-299240b3d025
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article