19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validation of T-Track® CMV to assess the functionality of cytomegalovirus-reactive cell-mediated immunity in hemodialysis patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Uncontrolled cytomegalovirus (CMV) replication in immunocompromised solid-organ transplant recipients is a clinically relevant issue and an indication of impaired CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI). Primary aim of this study was to assess the suitability of the immune monitoring tool T-Track® CMV to determine CMV-reactive CMI in a cohort of hemodialysis patients representative of patients eligible for renal transplantation. Positive and negative agreement of T-Track® CMV with CMV serology was examined in 124 hemodialysis patients, of whom 67 (54%) revealed a positive CMV serostatus. Secondary aim of the study was to evaluate T-Track® CMV performance against two unrelated CMV-specific CMI monitoring assays, QuantiFERON®-CMV and a cocktail of six class I iTAg™ MHC Tetramers.

          Results

          Positive T-Track® CMV results were obtained in 90% (60/67) of CMV-seropositive hemodialysis patients. In comparison, 73% (45/62) and 77% (40/52) positive agreement with CMV serology was achieved using QuantiFERON®-CMV and iTAg™ MHC Tetramer. Positive T-Track® CMV responses in CMV-seropositive patients were dominated by pp65-reactive cells (58/67 [87%]), while IE-1-responsive cells contributed to an improved (87% to 90%) positive agreement of T-Track® CMV with CMV serology. Interestingly, T-Track® CMV, QuantiFERON®-CMV and iTAg™ MHC Tetramers showed 79% (45/57), 87% (48/55) and 93% (42/45) negative agreement with serology, respectively, and a strong inter-assay variability. Notably, T-Track® CMV was able to detect IE-1-reactive cells in blood samples of patients with a negative CMV serology, suggesting either a previous exposure to CMV that yielded a cellular but no humoral immune response, or TCR cross-reactivity with foreign antigens, both suggesting a possible protective immunity against CMV in these patients.

          Conclusion

          T-Track® CMV is a highly sensitive assay, enabling the functional assessment of CMV-responsive cells in hemodialysis patients prior to renal transplantation. T-Track® CMV thus represents a valuable immune monitoring tool to identify candidate transplant recipients potentially at increased risk for CMV-related clinical complications.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12865-017-0194-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Predicting population coverage of T-cell epitope-based diagnostics and vaccines

          Background T cells recognize a complex between a specific major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule and a particular pathogen-derived epitope. A given epitope will elicit a response only in individuals that express an MHC molecule capable of binding that particular epitope. MHC molecules are extremely polymorphic and over a thousand different human MHC (HLA) alleles are known. A disproportionate amount of MHC polymorphism occurs in positions constituting the peptide-binding region, and as a result, MHC molecules exhibit a widely varying binding specificity. In the design of peptide-based vaccines and diagnostics, the issue of population coverage in relation to MHC polymorphism is further complicated by the fact that different HLA types are expressed at dramatically different frequencies in different ethnicities. Thus, without careful consideration, a vaccine or diagnostic with ethnically biased population coverage could result. Results To address this issue, an algorithm was developed to calculate, on the basis of HLA genotypic frequencies, the fraction of individuals expected to respond to a given epitope set, diagnostic or vaccine. The population coverage estimates are based on MHC binding and/or T cell restriction data, although the tool can be utilized in a more general fashion. The algorithm was implemented as a web-application available at . Conclusion We have developed a web-based tool to predict population coverage of T-cell epitope-based diagnostics and vaccines based on MHC binding and/or T cell restriction data. Accordingly, epitope-based vaccines or diagnostics can be designed to maximize population coverage, while minimizing complexity (that is, the number of different epitopes included in the diagnostic or vaccine), and also minimizing the variability of coverage obtained or projected in different ethnic groups.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Response of naïve and memory CD8+ T cells to antigen stimulation in vivo.

            We studied the influence of memory T cell properties on the efficiency of secondary immune responses by comparing the in vivo immune response of the same numbers of T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic (Tg) naïve and memory T cells. Compared to naïve Tg cells, memory cells divided after a shorter lag time; had an increased division rate; a lower loss rate; and showed more rapid and efficient differentiation to effector functions. We found that initial naïve T cell priming resulted in cells expressing mutually exclusive effector functions, whereas memory T cells were multifunctional after reactivation, with each individual cell expressing two to three different effector functions simultaneously. These special properties of memory T cells ensure the immediate control of reinfection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Primary immune responses to human CMV: a critical role for IFN-gamma-producing CD4+ T cells in protection against CMV disease.

              The correlates of protective immunity to disease-inducing viruses in humans remain to be elucidated. We determined the kinetics and characteristics of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in the course of primary CMV infection in asymptomatic and symptomatic recipients of renal transplants. Specific CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) and antibody responses developed regardless of clinical signs. CD45RA(-)CD27(+)CCR7(-) CTLs, although classified as immature effector cells in HIV infection, were the predominant CD8 effector population in the acute phase of protective immune reactions to CMV and were functionally competent. Whereas in asymptomatic individuals the CMV-specific CD4(+) T-cell response preceded CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cell responses, in symptomatic individuals the CMV-specific effector-memory CD4(+) T-cell response was delayed and only detectable after antiviral therapy. The appearance of disease symptoms in these patients suggests that functional CD8(+) T-cell and antibody responses are insufficient to control viral replication and that formation of effector-memory CD4(+) T cells is necessary for recovery of infection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Bernhard.Banas@ukr.de
                Carsten.Boeger@ukr.de
                Gerhard.Lueckhoff@dialyse-la.de
                Bernd.Krueger@umm.de
                Sascha.Barabas@lophius.com
                Julia.Batzilla@lophius.com
                Mathias.Schemmerer@ukr.de
                Josef.Koestler@ukr.de
                Hanna.Bendfeldt@lophius.com
                Anne.Rascle@lophius.com
                Ralf.Wagner@ukr.de
                Ludwig.Deml@lophius.com
                Joachim.Leicht@dialysezentrum-schwandorf.de
                Bernhard.Kraemer@umm.de
                Journal
                BMC Immunol
                BMC Immunol
                BMC Immunology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2172
                7 March 2017
                7 March 2017
                2017
                : 18
                : 15
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9194 7179, GRID grid.411941.8, Department of Nephrology, , University Medical Center Regensburg, ; Regensburg, Germany
                [2 ]Dialysis Center Landshut, Landshut, Germany
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2162 1728, GRID grid.411778.c, 5th Department of Medicine, , University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University Heidelberg, ; Mannheim, Germany
                [4 ]Lophius Biosciences GmbH, Regensburg, Germany
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2190 5763, GRID grid.7727.5, Institute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, , University of Regensburg, ; Regensburg, Germany
                [6 ]Dialysis Center Schwandorf, Schwandorf, Germany
                Article
                194
                10.1186/s12865-017-0194-z
                5339958
                28270092
                8252bc9a-7470-4451-bd6d-c9550407046e
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 13 August 2016
                : 10 February 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Bayerische Forschungsstiftung (DE)
                Award ID: AZ 924-10
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005626, Universität Regensburg;
                Award ID: ReForM C Project 03-082
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002745, Bayerische Forschungsstiftung;
                Award ID: AZ 1070-13 (ForBiMed project D5)
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Immunology
                cytomegalovirus,cmv,ie-1,pp65,cell-mediated immunity,ifn-γ elispot,t-track® cmv,quantiferon®-cmv,itag™ mhc tetramers,hemodialysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article