6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Automated segmentation of changes in FLAIR-hyperintense white matter lesions in multiple sclerosis on serial magnetic resonance imaging

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Longitudinal analysis of white matter lesion changes on serial MRI has become an important parameter to study diseases with white-matter lesions. Here, we build on earlier work on cross-sectional lesion segmentation; we present a fully automatic pipeline for serial analysis of FLAIR-hyperintense white matter lesions. Our algorithm requires three-dimensional gradient echo T1- and FLAIR- weighted images at 3 Tesla as well as available cross-sectional lesion segmentations of both time points. Preprocessing steps include lesion filling and intrasubject registration. For segmentation of lesion changes, initial lesion maps of different time points are fused; herein changes in intensity are analyzed at the voxel level. Significance of lesion change is estimated by comparison with the difference distribution of FLAIR intensities within normal appearing white matter. The method is validated on MRI data of two time points from 40 subjects with multiple sclerosis derived from two different scanners (20 subjects per scanner). Manual segmentation of lesion increases served as gold standard. Across all lesion increases, voxel-wise Dice coefficient (0.7) as well as lesion-wise detection rate (0.8) and false-discovery rate (0.2) indicate good overall performance. Analysis of scans from a repositioning experiment in a single patient with multiple sclerosis did not yield a single false positive lesion. We also introduce the lesion change plot as a descriptive tool for the lesion change of individual patients with regard to both number and volume. An open source implementation of the algorithm is available at http://www.statistical-modeling.de/lst.html.

          Highlights

          • Quantification of white matter lesion changes is important in multiple sclerosis.

          • We developed and validated an algorithm for automated detection of lesion changes.

          • Our algorithm requires T1-weighted and FLAIR images derived at 3 T as well as available cross-sectional lesion segmentations.

          • With data from 2 different scanners, the tool showed good agreement with manual tracing.

          • An open-source application is available.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Normalized accurate measurement of longitudinal brain change.

          Quantitative measurement of change in brain size and shape (e.g., to estimate atrophy) is an important current area of research. New methods of change analysis attempt to improve robustness, accuracy, and extent of automation. A fully automated method has been developed that achieves high estimation accuracy. A fully automated method of longitudinal change analysis is presented here, which automatically segments brain from nonbrain in each image, registers the two brain images while using estimated skull images to constrain scaling and skew, and finally estimates brain surface motion by tracking surface points to subvoxel accuracy. The method described has been shown to be accurate ( approximately 0.2% brain volume change error) and to achieve high robustness (no failures in several hundred analyses over a range of different data sets).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in brain MRI: A review of automated approaches

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intra- and interscanner variability of magnetic resonance imaging based volumetry in multiple sclerosis.

              Brain volumetric measurements in multiple sclerosis (MS) reflect not only disease-specific processes but also other sources of variability. The latter has to be considered especially in multicenter and longitudinal studies. Here, we compare data generated by three different 3-Tesla magnetic resonance scanners (Philips Achieva; Siemens Verio; GE Signa MR750). We scanned two patients diagnosed with relapsing remitting MS six times per scanner within three weeks (T1w and FLAIR, 3D). We assessed T2-hyperintense lesions by an automated lesion segmentation tool and determined volumes of grey matter (GM), white matter (WM) and whole brain (GM+WM) from the lesion-filled T1-weighted images using voxel-based morphometry (SPM8/VBM8) and SIENAX (FSL). We measured cortical thickness using FreeSurfer from both, lesion-filled and original T1-weighted images. We quantified brain volume changes with SIENA. In both patients, we found significant differences in total lesion volume, global brain tissue volumes and cortical thickness measures between the scanners. Morphometric measures varied remarkably between repeated scans at each scanner, independent of the brain imaging software tool used. We conclude that for cross-sectional multicenter studies, the effect of different scanners has to be taken into account. For longitudinal monocentric studies, the expected effect size should exceed the size of false positive findings observed in this study. Assuming a physiological loss of brain volume of about 0.3% per year in healthy adult subjects (Good et al., 2001), which may double in MS (De Stefano et al., 2010; De Stefano et al., 2015), with current tools reliable estimation of brain atrophy in individual patients is only possible over periods of several years.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neuroimage Clin
                Neuroimage Clin
                NeuroImage : Clinical
                Elsevier
                2213-1582
                02 May 2019
                2019
                02 May 2019
                : 23
                : 101849
                Affiliations
                [a ]Neurology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81541 Munich, Germany
                [b ]TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81541 Munich, Germany
                [c ]Medical Image Analysis Center, MIAC AG, Mittlere Strasse 83, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
                [d ]Biomedical Engineering, University Basel, Switzerland
                [e ]Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791 Bochum, Germany
                [f ]Neurology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz and Neuroimaging Center of the Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN-NIC), Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
                [g ]Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Kraepelinstr. 2-10, 80804 Munich, Germany
                [h ]Neurology, Sana Kliniken des Landkreises Cham, August-Holz-Straße 1, 93413 Cham, Germany
                [i ]Department of Psychiatry and Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
                [j ]Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
                [k ]Neuroradiology, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81541 Munich, Germany
                [l ]Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Feodor-Lynen-Str. 17, 81377 Munich, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Neurology, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany. mark.muehlau@ 123456tum.de
                [1]

                These authors contributed equally.

                [2]

                German Competence Network for Multiple Sclerosis (KKNMS).

                Article
                S2213-1582(19)30199-8 101849
                10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101849
                6517532
                31085465
                830c6886-263d-470c-913a-590b6620c3c3
                © 2019 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 20 March 2019
                : 1 May 2019
                Categories
                Regular Article

                magnetic resonance imaging,multiple sclerosis,white matter lesions,lesion segmentation

                Comments

                Comment on this article