7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of oxygenation modalities among patients with postoperative respiratory failure: a pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Postoperative respiratory failure is associated with increased perioperative complications. Our aim is to compare outcomes between non-invasive ventilation (NIV), high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), and standard oxygen in patients at high-risk for or with established postoperative respiratory failure.

          Methods

          Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were reviewed from inception to September 2019. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared NIV, HFNC, and standard oxygen in patients at high risk for or with established postoperative respiratory failure. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and Bayesian 95% credible intervals (CrIs).

          Results

          Nine RCTs representing 1865 patients were included (the mean age was 61.6 ± 10.2 and 64.4% were males). In comparison with standard oxygen, NIV was associated with a significant reduction in intubation rate (OR 0.23; 95% Cr.I. 0.10–0.46), mortality (OR 0.45; 95% Cr.I. 0.27–0.71), and intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections (OR 0.43, 95% Cr.I. 0.25–0.70). Compared to standard oxygen, HFNC was associated with a significant reduction in intubation rate (OR 0.28, 95% Cr.I. 0.08–0.76) and ICU-acquired infections (OR 0.41; 95% Cr.I. 0.20–0.80), but not mortality (OR 0.58; 95% Cr.I. 0.26–1.22). There were no significant differences between HFNC and NIV regarding different outcomes. In a subgroup analysis, we observed a mortality benefit with NIV over standard oxygen in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgeries but not in abdominal surgeries. Furthermore, in comparison with standard oxygen, NIV and HFNC were associated with lower intubation rates following cardiothoracic surgeries while only NIV reduced the intubation rates following abdominal surgeries.

          Conclusions

          Among patients with post-operative respiratory failure, HFNC and NIV were associated with significantly reduced rates of intubation and ICU-acquired infections compared with standard oxygen. Moreover, NIV was associated with reduced mortality in comparison with standard oxygen.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure.

          High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) improves the clinical outcomes of nonintubated patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Effects on oxygenation, comfort, and clinical outcome.

            Oxygen is commonly administered after extubation. Although several devices are available, data about their clinical efficacy are scarce.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

              Studies of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients that combine populations that are at high and low risk for reintubation suggest that conditioned high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy after extubation improves oxygenation compared with conventional oxygen therapy. However, conclusive data about reintubation are lacking.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                yzayed1@hurleymc.com , yz.alzayed@yahoo.com
                Journal
                J Intensive Care
                J Intensive Care
                Journal of Intensive Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                2052-0492
                17 July 2020
                17 July 2020
                2020
                : 8
                : 51
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.17088.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2150 1785, Department of Internal Medicine, , Hurley Medical Center/Michigan State University, ; One Hurley Plaza, Suite 212, Flint, MI 48503 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.5288.7, ISNI 0000 0000 9758 5690, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, , Oregon Health & Science University, ; Portland, Oregon USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.17088.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2150 1785, College of Human Medicine, , Michigan State University, ; East Lansing, MI USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.411324.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2324 3572, Department of Anesthesia, , Lebanese University, ; Beirut, Lebanon
                [5 ]GRID grid.17088.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2150 1785, College of Osteopathic Medicine, , Michigan State University, ; East Lansing, MI USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.17088.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2150 1785, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, , Hurley Medical Center/Michigan State University, ; Flint, MI USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0179-512X
                Article
                468
                10.1186/s40560-020-00468-x
                7366473
                32690993
                836dce92-278b-4873-8b4e-594f4e86ab20
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 3 April 2020
                : 8 July 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                postoperative respiratory failure,high-flow nasal cannula,non-invasive ventilation,standard oxygen,meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article