Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Scandinavian SSAI clinical practice guideline on choice of inotropic agent for patients with acute circulatory failure

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Adult critically ill patients often suffer from acute circulatory failure and those with low cardiac output may be treated with inotropic agents. The aim of this Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine guideline was to present patient‐important treatment recommendations on this topic.

          Methods

          This guideline was developed according to GRADE. We assessed the following subpopulations of patients with shock: (1) shock in general, (2) septic shock, (3) cardiogenic shock, (4) hypovolemic shock, (5) shock after cardiac surgery, and (6) other types of shock, including vasodilatory shock. We assessed patient‐important outcome measures, including mortality and serious adverse reactions.

          Results

          For all patients, we suggest against the routine use of any inotropic agent, including dobutamine, as compared to placebo/no treatment (very low quality of evidence). For patients with shock in general, and in those with septic and other types of shock, we suggest using dobutamine rather than levosimendan or epinephrine (very low quality of evidence). For patients with cardiogenic shock and in those with shock after cardiac surgery, we suggest using dobutamine rather than milrinone (very low quality of evidence). For the other clinical questions, we refrained from giving any recommendations or suggestions.

          Conclusions

          We suggest against the routine use of any inotropic agent in adult patients with shock. If used, we suggest using dobutamine rather than other inotropic agents for the majority of patients, however, the quality of evidence was very low, implying high uncertainty on the balance between the benefits and harms of inotropic agents.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The AGREE Reporting Checklist: a tool to improve reporting of clinical practice guidelines

          AGREE II is a widely used standard for assessing the methodological quality of practice guidelines. This article describes the development of the AGREE Reporting Checklist, which was designed to improve the quality of practice guideline reporting and aligns with AGREE II in its structure and content.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence.

            To clarify the GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) definition of certainty of evidence and suggest possible approaches to rating certainty of the evidence for systematic reviews, health technology assessments and guidelines.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Levosimendan vs dobutamine for patients with acute decompensated heart failure: the SURVIVE Randomized Trial.

              Because acute decompensated heart failure causes substantial morbidity and mortality, there is a need for agents that at least improve hemodynamics and relieve symptoms without adversely affecting survival. To assess the effect of a short-term intravenous infusion of levosimendan or dobutamine on long-term survival. The Survival of Patients With Acute Heart Failure in Need of Intravenous Inotropic Support (SURVIVE) study was a randomized, double-blind trial comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan or dobutamine in 1327 patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure who required inotropic support. The trial was conducted at 75 centers in 9 countries and patients were randomized between March 2003 and December 2004. Intravenous levosimendan (n = 664) or intravenous dobutamine (n = 663). All-cause mortality at 180 days. All-cause mortality at 180 days occurred in 173 (26%) patients in the levosimendan group and 185 (28%) patients in the dobutamine group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.13; P = .40). The levosimendan group had greater decreases in B-type natriuretic peptide level at 24 hours that persisted through 5 days compared with the dobutamine group (P<.001 for all time points). There were no statistical differences between treatment groups for the other secondary end points (all-cause mortality at 31 days, number of days alive and out of the hospital, patient global assessment, patient assessment of dyspnea at 24 hours, and cardiovascular mortality at 180 days). There was a higher incidence of cardiac failure in the dobutamine group. There were higher incidences of atrial fibrillation, hypokalemia, and headache in the levosimendan group. Despite an initial reduction in plasma B-type natriuretic peptide level in patients in the levosimendan group compared with patients in the dobutamine group, levosimendan did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality at 180 days or affect any secondary clinical outcomes. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00348504.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mortenhylander@gmail.com
                Journal
                Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
                Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
                10.1111/(ISSN)1399-6576
                AAS
                Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0001-5172
                1399-6576
                25 February 2018
                April 2018
                : 62
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/aas.2018.62.issue-4 )
                : 420-450
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Intensive Care 4131 Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark
                [ 2 ] Department of Anaesthesiology Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland
                [ 3 ] Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Umeå University Umeå Sweden
                [ 4 ] Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Department of Medicine and Health Linköping University Linköping Sweden
                [ 5 ] Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care University Hospital Northern Norway Tromsø Norway
                [ 6 ] Division of Critical Care Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
                [ 7 ] Division of Intensive Care Medicine Department of Perioperative, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine Helsinki University Hospital University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
                [ 8 ] Department of Anesthesia & Critical Care Landspitali University Hospital of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                M. H. Møller, Department of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK ‐ 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

                E‐mail: mortenhylander@ 123456gmail.com

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6378-9673
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5799-7655
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1546-9832
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4049-8910
                Article
                AAS13089
                10.1111/aas.13089
                5888146
                29479665
                83eede85-498c-4867-b8fa-cc66841151fa
                © 2018 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 24 November 2017
                : 28 December 2017
                : 03 January 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 2, Pages: 31, Words: 11017
                Funding
                Funded by: Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI)
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                aas13089
                April 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.3.4 mode:remove_FC converted:06.04.2018

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                Anesthesiology & Pain management

                Comments

                Comment on this article