0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The margin of internal risk volume on atrial septal and ventricular septal based on electrocardiograph gating 4DCT

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The aim of this study was to quantify the margin of internal risk volume (IRV) on the atrial septum (AS) and ventricular septum (VS) based on electrocardiograph gating (ECG-gating) 4DCT.

          Methods

          Twenty patients were enrolled and received an ECG-gating 4DCT scan performed in breath-hold, and CT images were reconstructed at 5% intervals of the cardiac cycle for a total of 20 phases (0–95%). The contouring of the AS and VS were delineated in each phase, and the displacements and margin of the AS and VS were calculated. We fused the total of the AS and VS (0–95% phase), which were recorded as AS 20 and VS 20. The margins were applied to the AS and VS in every phase and revised according to the cover rate of AS 20 and VS 20.

          Results

          (I) The margins of the AS and VS according to displacements in the left-right, cranio-caudal, and antero-posterior direction were 3 mm, 3 mm, and 3 mm; and 3 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm, respectively. (II) The volume of AS 20 was (11.80±3.72) cm 3, which was 2.9 times larger than the maximum volume of the AS. The volume of VS 20 was (60.45±12.92) cm 3, which was 1.6 times larger than the maximum volume of the VS. (III) The emendatory margins of the AS and VS in the left-right, cranio-caudal, and antero-posterior direction were 7 mm, 10 mm, and 7 mm; and 5 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm, respectively. The emendatory margins were added to the AS and VS, and the coverage rates were (95.88±3.29)% and (95.24±2.54)%, respectively.

          Conclusions

          The margin of IRV on the AS and VS could cover the movement of AS and VS induced by heartbeat in the left-right, cranio-caudal, and antero-posterior direction respectively during thoracic radiotherapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Noninvasive Cardiac Radiation for Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia

          BACKGROUND Recent advances have enabled noninvasive mapping of cardiac arrhythmias with electrocardiographic imaging and noninvasive delivery of precise ablative radiation with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We combined these techniques to perform catheter-free, electrophysiology-guided, noninvasive cardiac radioablation for ventricular tachycardia. METHODS We targeted arrhythmogenic scar regions by combining anatomical imaging with noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging during ventricular tachycardia that was induced by means of an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD). SBRT simulation, planning, and treatments were performed with the use of standard techniques. Patients were treated with a single fraction of 25 Gy while awake. Efficacy was assessed by counting episodes of ventricular tachycardia, as recorded by ICDs. Safety was assessed by means of serial cardiac and thoracic imaging. RESULTS From April through November 2015, five patients with high-risk, refractory ventricular tachycardia underwent treatment. The mean noninvasive ablation time was 14 minutes (range, 11 to 18). During the 3 months before treatment, the patients had a combined history of 6577 episodes of ventricular tachycardia. During a 6-week postablation “blanking period” (when arrhythmias may occur owing to postablation inflammation), there were 680 episodes of ventricular tachycardia. After the 6-week blanking period, there were 4 episodes of ventricular tachycardia over the next 46 patient-months, for a reduction from baseline of 99.9%. A reduction in episodes of ventricular tachycardia occurred in all five patients. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction did not decrease with treatment. At 3 months, adjacent lung showed opacities consistent with mild inflammatory changes, which had resolved by 1 year. CONCLUSIONS In five patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia, noninvasive treatment with electrophysiology-guided cardiac radioablation markedly reduced the burden of ventricular tachycardia. (Funded by Barnes–Jewish Hospital Foundation and others.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Motion management strategies and technical issues associated with stereotactic body radiotherapy of thoracic and upper abdominal tumors: A review from NRG oncology.

            The efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been well demonstrated. However, it presents unique challenges for accurate planning and delivery especially in the lungs and upper abdomen where respiratory motion can be significantly confounding accurate targeting and avoidance of normal tissues. In this paper, we review the current literature on SBRT for lung and upper abdominal tumors with particular emphasis on addressing respiratory motion and its affects. We provide recommendations on strategies to manage motion for different, patient-specific situations. Some of the recommendations will potentially be adopted to guide clinical trial protocols.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Left Ventricular Rotation and Twist: Why Should We Learn?

              The left ventricle twists in systole storing potential energy and untwists (recoils) in diastole releasing the energy. Twist aids left ventricular ejection and untwist aids relaxation and ventricular filling. Therefore, rotation and torsion are important in cardiac mechanics. However, the methodology of their investigations is limited to invasive techniques or magnetic resonance imaging. With the advent of speckle tracking echocardiography, however, rotation and torsion (twist) become familiar to echocardiographers. In this review, I outline the mechanism and influencing factors of rotation and torsion with the anticipation of the routine use of these measurements in clinical practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Transl Med
                Ann Transl Med
                ATM
                Annals of Translational Medicine
                AME Publishing Company
                2305-5839
                2305-5847
                May 2021
                May 2021
                : 9
                : 10
                : 842
                Affiliations
                [1 ]deptDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital , Tongji University School of Medicine , Shanghai, China;
                [2 ]deptDepartment of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute , Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences , Jinan, China
                Author notes

                Contributions: (I) Conception and design: G Gong, Y Xu; (II) Administrative support: Y Xu, Y Yin; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: G Gong, Y Yin; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: Q Li, Y Tong; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: Q Li, Y Tong; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

                Correspondence to: Guanzhong Gong. Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, China. Email: gongguanzhong@ 123456163.com ; Yaping Xu. Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 507 Zhengmin Road, Shanghai, China. Email: xuyaping1207@ 123456163.com .
                Article
                atm-09-10-842
                10.21037/atm-21-1162
                8184443
                34164476
                84384b63-e9c7-4e87-af62-a887a0c33ad3
                2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

                Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.

                History
                : 24 March 2021
                : 29 April 2021
                Categories
                Original Article

                electrocardiograph gating (ecg),atrial septum (as),ventricular septum (vs),margin,internal risk volume (irv)

                Comments

                Comment on this article