2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Elbow Motion Trajectory Prediction Using a Multi-Modal Wearable System: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Motion intention detection is fundamental in the implementation of human-machine interfaces applied to assistive robots. In this paper, multiple machine learning techniques have been explored for creating upper limb motion prediction models, which generally depend on three factors: the signals collected from the user (such as kinematic or physiological), the extracted features and the selected algorithm. We explore the use of different features extracted from various signals when used to train multiple algorithms for the prediction of elbow flexion angle trajectories. The accuracy of the prediction was evaluated based on the mean velocity and peak amplitude of the trajectory, which are sufficient to fully define it. Results show that prediction accuracy when using solely physiological signals is low, however, when kinematic signals are included, it is largely improved. This suggests kinematic signals provide a reliable source of information for predicting elbow trajectories. Different models were trained using 10 algorithms. Regularization algorithms performed well in all conditions, whereas neural networks performed better when the most important features are selected. The extensive analysis provided in this study can be consulted to aid in the development of accurate upper limb motion intention detection models.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy.

          Feature selection is an important problem for pattern classification systems. We study how to select good features according to the maximal statistical dependency criterion based on mutual information. Because of the difficulty in directly implementing the maximal dependency condition, we first derive an equivalent form, called minimal-redundancy-maximal-relevance criterion (mRMR), for first-order incremental feature selection. Then, we present a two-stage feature selection algorithm by combining mRMR and other more sophisticated feature selectors (e.g., wrappers). This allows us to select a compact set of superior features at very low cost. We perform extensive experimental comparison of our algorithm and other methods using three different classifiers (naive Bayes, support vector machine, and linear discriminate analysis) and four different data sets (handwritten digits, arrhythmia, NCI cancer cell lines, and lymphoma tissues). The results confirm that mRMR leads to promising improvement on feature selection and classification accuracy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Upper-Limb Powered Exoskeleton Design

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel)
                sensors
                Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
                MDPI
                1424-8220
                12 January 2021
                January 2021
                : 21
                : 2
                : 498
                Affiliations
                Robotics Research Centre, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore; kieran_little@ 123456live.co.uk (K.L.); kbobby@ 123456ntu.edu.sg (B.K.P.); sibo001@ 123456e.ntu.edu.sg (S.Y.); bernardo001@ 123456e.ntu.edu.sg (B.N.); d.campolo@ 123456ntu.edu.sg (D.C.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: daccoto@ 123456ntu.edu.sg
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9551-5896
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3024-0630
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6665-0052
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6930-0413
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9039-5488
                Article
                sensors-21-00498
                10.3390/s21020498
                7827251
                33445601
                843e2979-8bcf-442c-91e6-b76124b9a2be
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 10 December 2020
                : 08 January 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Biomedical engineering
                motion intention detection,assistive robotics,rehabilitation robotics,human-machine interface,machine learning

                Comments

                Comment on this article