1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Deriving a Polarizable Force Field for Biomolecular Building Blocks with Minimal Empirical Calibration

      research-article
      ,
      The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B
      American Chemical Society

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Force field parametrization involves a complex set of linked optimization problems, with the goal of describing complex molecular interactions by using simple classical potential-energy functions that model Coulomb interactions, dispersion, and exchange repulsion. These functions comprise a set of atomic (and molecular) parameters and together with the bonded terms they constitute the molecular mechanics force field. Traditionally, many of these parameters have been fitted in a calibration approach in which experimental measures for thermodynamic and other relevant properties of small-molecule compounds are used for fitting and validation. As these approaches are laborious and time-consuming and represent an underdetermined optimization problem, we study methods to fit and derive an increasing number of parameters directly from electronic structure calculations, in order to greatly reduce possible parameter space for the remaining free parameters. In the current work we investigate a polarizable model with a higher order dispersion term for use in biomolecular simulation. Results for 49 biochemically relevant molecules are presented including updated parameters for hydrocarbon side chains. We show that our recently presented set of QM/MM derived atomic polarizabilities can be used in direct conjunction with partial charges and a higher order dispersion model that are quantum-mechanically determined, to freeze nearly all (i.e., 132 out of 138) nonbonded parameters to their quantum determined values.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Optimized Slater-type basis sets for the elements 1-118.

          Seven different types of Slater type basis sets for the elements H (Z = 1) up to E118 (Z = 118), ranging from a double zeta valence quality up to a quadruple zeta valence quality, are tested in their performance in neutral atomic and diatomic oxide calculations. The exponents of the Slater type functions are optimized for the use in (scalar relativistic) zeroth-order regular approximated (ZORA) equations. Atomic tests reveal that, on average, the absolute basis set error of 0.03 kcal/mol in the density functional calculation of the valence spinor energies of the neutral atoms with the largest all electron basis set of quadruple zeta quality is lower than the average absolute difference of 0.16 kcal/mol in these valence spinor energies if one compares the results of ZORA equation with those of the fully relativistic Dirac equation. This average absolute basis set error increases to about 1 kcal/mol for the all electron basis sets of triple zeta valence quality, and to approximately 4 kcal/mol for the all electron basis sets of double zeta quality. The molecular tests reveal that, on average, the calculated atomization energies of 118 neutral diatomic oxides MO, where the nuclear charge Z of M ranges from Z = 1-118, with the all electron basis sets of triple zeta quality with two polarization functions added are within 1-2 kcal/mol of the benchmark results with the much larger all electron basis sets, which are of quadruple zeta valence quality with four polarization functions added. The accuracy is reduced to about 4-5 kcal/mol if only one polarization function is used in the triple zeta basis sets, and further reduced to approximately 20 kcal/mol if the all electron basis sets of double zeta quality are used. The inclusion of g-type STOs to the large benchmark basis sets had an effect of less than 1 kcal/mol in the calculation of the atomization energies of the group 2 and group 14 diatomic oxides. The basis sets that are optimized for calculations using the frozen core approximation (frozen core basis sets) have a restricted basis set in the core region compared to the all electron basis sets. On average, the use of these frozen core basis sets give atomic basis set errors that are approximately twice as large as the corresponding all electron basis set errors and molecular atomization energies that are close to the corresponding all electron results. Only if spin-orbit coupling is included in the frozen core calculations larger errors are found, especially for the heavier elements, due to the additional approximation that is made that the basis functions are orthogonalized on scalar relativistic core orbitals. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Water dispersion interactions strongly influence simulated structural properties of disordered protein states.

            Many proteins can be partially or completely disordered under physiological conditions. Structural characterization of these disordered states using experimental methods can be challenging, since they are composed of a structurally heterogeneous ensemble of conformations rather than a single dominant conformation. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations should in principle provide an ideal tool for elucidating the composition and behavior of disordered states at an atomic level of detail. Unfortunately, MD simulations using current physics-based models tend to produce disordered-state ensembles that are structurally too compact relative to experiments. We find that the water models typically used in MD simulations significantly underestimate London dispersion interactions, and speculate that this may be a possible reason for these erroneous results. To test this hypothesis, we create a new water model, TIP4P-D, that approximately corrects for these deficiencies in modeling water dispersion interactions while maintaining compatibility with existing physics-based models. We show that simulations of solvated proteins using this new water model typically result in disordered states that are substantially more expanded and in better agreement with experiment. These results represent a significant step toward extending the range of applicability of MD simulations to include the study of (partially or fully) disordered protein states.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A post-Hartree-Fock model of intermolecular interactions: inclusion of higher-order corrections.

              We have previously demonstrated that the dipole moment of the exchange hole can be used to derive intermolecular C(6) dispersion coefficients [J. Chem. Phys. 122, 154104 (2005)]. This was subsequently the basis for a novel post-Hartree-Fock model of intermolecular interactions [J. Chem. Phys. 123, 024101 (2005)]. In the present work, the model is extended to include higher-order dispersion coefficients C(8) and C(10). The extended model performs very well for prediction of intermonomer separations and binding energies of 45 van der Waals complexes. In particular, it performs twice as well as basis-set extrapolated MP2 theory for dispersion-bound complexes, with minimal computational cost.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Phys Chem B
                J Phys Chem B
                jp
                jpcbfk
                The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B
                American Chemical Society
                1520-6106
                1520-5207
                19 February 2020
                05 March 2020
                : 124
                : 9
                : 1628-1636
                Affiliations
                [1]AIMMS Division of Molecular Toxicology , De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Article
                10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b10903
                7061328
                32073849
                8482793c-3462-4442-94f4-d83266d34367
                Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society

                This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes.

                History
                : 21 November 2019
                : 23 January 2020
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                jp9b10903
                jp9b10903

                Physical chemistry
                Physical chemistry

                Comments

                Comment on this article