17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Did limits on payments for tobacco placements in US movies affect how movies are made?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To compare how smoking was depicted in Hollywood movies before and after an intervention limiting paid product placement for cigarette brands.

          Design

          Correlational analysis.

          Setting/Participants

          Top box office hits released in the USA primarily between 1988 and 2011 (n=2134).

          Intervention

          The Master Settlement Agreement (MSA), implemented in 1998.

          Main outcome measures

          This study analyses trends for whether or not movies depicted smoking, and among movies with smoking, counts for character smoking scenes and average smoking scene duration.

          Results

          There was no detectable trend for any measure prior to the MSA. In 1999, 79% of movies contained smoking, and movies with smoking contained 8 scenes of character smoking, with the average duration of a character smoking scene being 81 s. After the MSA, there were significant negative post-MSA changes (p<0.05) for linear trends in proportion of movies with any smoking (which declined to 41% by 2011) and, in movies with smoking, counts of character smoking scenes (which declined to 4 by 2011). Between 1999 and 2000, there was an immediate and dramatic drop in average length of a character smoking scene, which decreased to 19 s, and remained there for the duration of the study. The probability that the drop of −62.5 (95% CI −55.1 to −70.0) seconds was due to chance was p<10 −16.

          Conclusions

          This study’s correlational data suggest that restricting payments for tobacco product placement coincided with profound changes in the duration of smoking depictions in movies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General

          (2012)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Trends in tobacco and alcohol brand placements in popular US movies, 1996 through 2009.

            Tobacco and alcohol use in movies could be influenced by product placement agreements. Tobacco brand placement was limited by the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) after 1998, while alcohol is subject to self-regulation only. To examine recent trends for tobacco and alcohol use in movies. We expected that the MSA would be associated with declines in tobacco but not alcohol brand placement (hypothesis formulated after data collection). Content analysis. Top 100 box-office hits released in the United States from 1996 through 2009 (N = 1400). The MSA, an agreement signed in 1998 between the state attorneys general and tobacco companies, ended payments for tobacco brand placements in movies. Trend for tobacco and alcohol brand counts and seconds of screen time for the pre-MSA period from 1996 through 1999 compared with the post-MSA period from 2000 through 2009. Altogether, the 1400 movies contained 500 tobacco and 2433 alcohol brand appearances. After implementation of the MSA, tobacco brand appearances dropped exponentially by 7.0% (95% CI, 5.4%-8.7%) each year, then held at a level of 22 per year after 2006. The MSA also heralded a drop in tobacco screen time for youth- and adult-rated movies (42.3% [95% CI, 24.1%-60.2%] and 85.4% [56.1%-100.0%], respectively). In contrast, there was little change in alcohol brand appearances or alcohol screen time overall. In addition, alcohol brand appearances in youth-rated movies trended upward during the period from 80 to 145 per year, an increase of 5.2 (95% CI, 2.4-7.9) appearances per year. Tobacco brands in movies declined after implementation of externally enforced constraints on the practice, coinciding also with a decline in tobacco screen time and suggesting that enforced limits on tobacco brand placement also limited onscreen depictions of smoking. Alcohol brand placement, subject only to industry self-regulation, was found increasingly in movies rated for youth as young as 13 years, despite the industry's intent to avoid marketing to underage persons.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              How the tobacco industry built its relationship with Hollywood.

              To describe the development of the relationship between the tobacco industry and the entertainment industry. Review of previously secret tobacco industry documents available on the internet. Both the entertainment and tobacco industries recognised the high value of promotion of tobacco through entertainment media. The 1980s saw undertakings by four tobacco companies, Philip Morris, RJ Reynolds (RJR), American Tobacco Company, and Brown and Williamson to place their products in movies. RJR and Philip Morris also worked to place products on television at the beginning of the decade. Each company hired aggressive product placement firms to represent its interests in Hollywood. These firms placed products and tobacco signage in positive situations that would encourage viewers to use tobacco and kept brands from being used in negative situations. At least one of the companies, RJR, undertook an extensive campaign to hook Hollywood on tobacco by providing free cigarettes to actors on a monthly basis. Efforts were also made to place favourable articles relating to product use by actors in national print media and to encourage professional photographers to take pictures of actors smoking specific brands. The cigar industry started developing connections with the entertainment industry beginning in the 1980s and paid product placements were made in both movies and on television. This effort did not always require money payments from the tobacco industry to the entertainment industry, suggesting that simply looking for cash payoffs may miss other important ties between the tobacco and entertainment industries. The tobacco industry understood the value of placing and encouraging tobacco use in films, and how to do it. While the industry claims to have ended this practice, smoking in motion pictures increased throughout the 1990s and remains a public health problem.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9209612
                20367
                Tob Control
                Tob Control
                Tobacco control
                0964-4563
                1468-3318
                17 March 2016
                28 January 2016
                January 2017
                01 January 2017
                : 26
                : 1
                : 105-108
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
                [2 ]Institute for Therapy and Health Research, Kiel, Germany
                [3 ]Department of Pediatrics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
                [4 ]Department of Pediatrics, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Dr James D Sargent, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA; James.D.Sargent@ 123456Dartmouth.edu
                Article
                NIHMS768761
                10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052400
                4965330
                26822189
                86364f6b-5bb5-43a8-a075-b71d1ba26788

                Open Access This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                To request permissions go to: http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions

                To order reprints go to: http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintform

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article