3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: This study aims to evaluate whether there is a correlation between implant stability, bone density, vital bone formation and implant diameter and length. Methods: Ninety patients were enrolled in this study. They underwent a socket preservation procedure with allograft or PRF and after 4 months, a total of 90 implants were placed. CBCT scans were assigned prior to implant placement in order to assess the bone density. During the surgical re-entry, a bone biopsy was harvested with a trephine drill. Immediately after implant insertion, the primary stability was measured. The secondary stability was measured 4 months after implant placement. Results: Primary stability showed a significant positive linear correlation with bone density (r = 0.471, p < 0.001) as well as with percentage of new bone formation (r = 0.567, p < 0.001). An average significant association of secondary stability with bone density (rs = 0.498, p < 0.001) and percentage of newly formed bone (r = 0.477, p < 0.001) was revealed. The mean values of primary stability in all three implant sizes, regarding the diameter of the implants, were similar (narrow 67.75; standard 66.78; wide 71.21) with no significant difference ( p = 0.262). The same tendency was observed for secondary stability (narrow 73.83; standard 75.25; wide 74.93), with no significant difference ( p = 0.277). Conclusions: The study revealed a high correlation between primary and secondary implant stability, and bone density, as well as with the percentage of vital bone formation. Implant length and diameter revealed no linear correlation with the implant stability.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Osseointegration and its experimental background.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing.

            If dental implantology is an increasingly successful treatment modality, why should we still need to understand the mechanisms of peri-implant bone healing? Are there differences in cortical and trabecular healing? What does "poor quality" bone mean? What stages of healing are most important? How do calcium phosphate-coated implants accelerate healing? What is the mechanism of bone bonding? While there are still many aspects of peri-implant healing that need to be elucidated, it is now possible to deconvolute this biological reaction cascade, both phenomenologically and experimentally, into three distinct phases that mirror the evolution of bone into an exquisite tissue capable of regeneration. The first and most important healing phase, osteoconduction, relies on the recruitment and migration of osteogenic cells to the implant surface, through the residue of the peri-implant blood clot. Among the most important aspects of osteoconduction are the knock-on effects generated at the implant surface, by the initiation of platelet activation, which result in directed osteogenic cell migration. The second healing phase, de novo bone formation, results in a mineralized interfacial matrix equivalent to that seen in the cement line in natural bone tissue. These two healing phases, osteoconduction and de novo bone formation, result in contact osteogenesis and, given an appropriate implant surface, bone bonding. The third healing phase, bone remodeling, relies on slower processes and is not considered here. This discussion paper argues that it is the very success of dental implants that is driving their increased use in ever more challenging clinical situations and that many of the most important steps in the peri-implant healing cascade are profoundly influenced by implant surface microtopography. By understanding what is important in peri-implant bone healing, we are now able to answer all the questions listed above.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant.

              N Meredith (2024)
              This paper aims to establish the parameters necessary to monitor successful implant placement and osseointegration.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                30 June 2021
                July 2021
                : 18
                : 13
                : 6994
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Oral Surgery Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University-Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
                [2 ]Center of Dental Implantology, Research Institute at the Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria; ivan.chenchev@ 123456mu-plovdiv.bg
                [3 ]CAD/CAM Center of Dental Medicine, Research Institute at the Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria; stefan.zlatev@ 123456mu-plovdiv.bg
                [4 ]Head and Neck Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Otoryngology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 699350, Israel; mijiritsky@ 123456bezeqint.net
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8914-2931
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8499-1619
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3486-6158
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1661-7529
                Article
                ijerph-18-06994
                10.3390/ijerph18136994
                8297224
                34208849
                8695f9dd-e626-40bc-a50f-b0392a21bb6b
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 09 June 2021
                : 27 June 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                dental implants,primary stability,secondary stability,bone density,implant diameter,implant length

                Comments

                Comment on this article