Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Optimal care at the end of life (OPAL): study protocol of a prospective interventional mixed-methods study with pretest-posttest-design in a primary health care setting considering the view of general practitioners, relatives of deceased patients and health care stakeholders

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          At the end of life, about 85–90% of patients can be treated within primary palliative care (PC) provided by general practitioners (GPs). In Germany, there is no structured approach for the provision of PC by GPs including a systematic as well as timely identification of patients who might benefit from PC, yet. The project “Optimal care at the end of life” (OPAL) focusses on an improvement of primary PC for patients with both oncological and non-oncological chronic progressive diseases in their last phase of life provided by GPs and health care services.

          Methods

          OPAL will take place in Hameln-Pyrmont, a rural region in Lower Saxony, Germany. Target groups are (a) GPs, (b) relatives of deceased patients and (c) health care providers. The study follows a three-phase approach in a mixed-methods and pre-post design. In phase I (baseline, t 0) we explore the usual practice of providing PC for patients with chronic progressive diseases by GPs and the collaboration with other health care providers. In phase II (intervention) the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) for the timely identification of patients who might benefit from PC will be implemented and tested in general practices. Furthermore, a public campaign will be started to inform stakeholders, to connect health care providers and to train change agents. In phase III (follow-up, t 1) we investigate the potential effect of the intervention to evaluate differences in the provision of PC by GPs and to convey factors for the implementation of SPICT in general practices.

          Discussion

          The project OPAL is the first study to implement the SPICT-DE regionwide in general practices in Germany. The project OPAL may contribute to an overall optimisation of primary PC for patients in Germany by reducing GPs’ uncertainty in initiating PC, by consolidating their skills and competencies in identifying patients who might benefit from PC, and by improving the cooperation between GPs and different health care stakeholders.

          Trial registration

          The study was retrospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien; trial registration number: DRKS00015108; date of registration: 22th of January 2019).

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Development and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT): a mixed-methods study

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            What tools are available to identify patients with palliative care needs in primary care: a systematic literature review and survey of European practice.

            It can be difficult to identify when a palliative care approach should be started both in malignant, and particularly, in non-malignant disease, ideally to run alongside disease-modifying care. A structured method or tool may be useful to help general practitioners (GPs) identify patients for early palliative care and trigger assessment and care planning.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Early identification of palliative care patients in general practice: development of RADboud indicators for PAlliative Care Needs (RADPAC).

              According to the World Health Organization (WHO) definition, palliative care should be initiated in an early phase and not be restricted to terminal care. In the literature, no validated tools predicting the optimal timing for initiating palliative care have been determined. The aim of this study was to systematically develop a tool for GPs with which they can identify patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cancer respectively, who could benefit from proactive palliative care. A three-step procedure, including a literature review, focus group interviews with input from the multidisciplinary field of palliative healthcare professionals, and a modified Rand Delphi process with GPs. The three-step procedure was used to develop sets of indicators for the early identification of CHF, COPD, and cancer patients who could benefit from palliative care. Three comprehensive sets of indicators were developed to support GPs in identifying patients with CHF, COPD, and cancer in need of palliative care. For CHF, seven indicators were found: for example, frequent hospital admissions. For COPD, six indicators were found: such as, Karnofsky score ≤50%. For cancer, eight indicators were found: for example, worse prognosis of the primary tumour. The RADboud indicators for PAlliative Care Needs (RADPAC) is the first tool developed from a combination of scientific evidence and practice experience that can help GPs in the identification of patients with CHF, COPD, or cancer, in need of palliative care. Applying the RADPAC facilitates the start of proactive palliative care and aims to improve the quality of palliative care in general practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                afshar.kambiz@mh-hannover.de
                mueller-mundt.gabriele@mh-hannover.de
                vanbaal.katharina@mh-hannover.de
                schrader.sophie@mh-hannover.de
                wiese.birgitt@mh-hannover.de
                jutta.bleidorn@med.uni-jena.de
                stiel.stephanie@mh-hannover.de
                schneider.nils@mh-hannover.de
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                15 July 2019
                15 July 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 486
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9529 9877, GRID grid.10423.34, Institute for General Practice, , Hannover Medical School, ; Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8517 6224, GRID grid.275559.9, Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, ; Bachstraße 18, 07743 Jena, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9959-3106
                Article
                4321
                10.1186/s12913-019-4321-9
                6631539
                31307457
                86ab6539-e49a-4e54-85c2-f2d2681d121e
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 17 April 2019
                : 3 July 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Innovation Fond of the Federal Joint Committee
                Award ID: 01VSF17028
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Health & Social care
                primary palliative care,general practice,health care services,complex intervention,spict

                Comments

                Comment on this article