21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Influence of lung collapse distribution on the physiologic response to recruitment maneuvers during noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure.

      Intensive Care Medicine
      Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, instrumentation, Female, Hemodynamics, physiology, Humans, Lung Volume Measurements, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Atelectasis, physiopathology, Respiratory Insufficiency, etiology, therapy, Respiratory Mechanics

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure (n-CPAP) has been proposed for the treatment of hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (h-ARF). Recruitment maneuvers were shown to improve oxygenation, i.e., the ratio of arterial oxygen tension to inspiratory oxygen fraction (PaO2/FiO2), during either invasive mechanical ventilation, and n-CPAP, with a response depending on the distribution of lung collapse. We hypothesized that, during n-CPAP, early h-ARF patients with bilateral (B(L)) distribution of lung involvement would benefit from recruitment maneuvers more than those with unilateral (U(L)) involvement. To perform a recruitment maneuver, once a minute we increased the pressure applied to the airway from 10 cmH2O to 25 cmH2O for 8 s (SIGH). We enrolled 24 patients with h-ARF (12 B(L) and 12 U(L)) who underwent four consecutive trials: (1) 30 min breathing through a Venturi mask (V(MASK)), (2) 1 h n-CPAP (n-CPAP1), (3) 1 h n-CPAP plus SIGH (n-CPAP(SIGH)), and (4) 1 h n-CPAP (n-CPAP2). Compared to V(MASK), n-CPAP at 10 cmH2O delivered via a helmet, increased PaO2/FiO2 and decreased dyspnea in both B(L) and U(L); furthermore, it reduced the respiratory rate and brought PaCO2 up to normal in B(L) only. Compared to n-CPAP, n-CPAP(SIGH) significantly improved PaO2/FiO2 in B(L) (225 ± 88 vs. 308 ± 105, respectively), whereas it produced no further improvement in PaO2/FiO2 in U(L) (232 ± 72 vs. 231 ± 77, respectively). SIGH did not affect hemodynamics in both groups. Compared to n-CPAP, n-CPAP(SIGH) further improved arterial oxygenation in B(L) patients, whereas it produced no additional benefit in those with U(L).

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article