209
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops

      research-article
      , *
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Despite the rapid adoption of genetically modified (GM) crops by farmers in many countries, controversies about this technology continue. Uncertainty about GM crop impacts is one reason for widespread public suspicion.

          Objective

          We carry out a meta-analysis of the agronomic and economic impacts of GM crops to consolidate the evidence.

          Data Sources

          Original studies for inclusion were identified through keyword searches in ISI Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, EconLit, and AgEcon Search.

          Study Eligibility Criteria

          Studies were included when they build on primary data from farm surveys or field trials anywhere in the world, and when they report impacts of GM soybean, maize, or cotton on crop yields, pesticide use, and/or farmer profits. In total, 147 original studies were included.

          Synthesis Methods

          Analysis of mean impacts and meta-regressions to examine factors that influence outcomes.

          Results

          On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. Yield gains and pesticide reductions are larger for insect-resistant crops than for herbicide-tolerant crops. Yield and profit gains are higher in developing countries than in developed countries.

          Limitations

          Several of the original studies did not report sample sizes and measures of variance.

          Conclusion

          The meta-analysis reveals robust evidence of GM crop benefits for farmers in developed and developing countries. Such evidence may help to gradually increase public trust in this technology.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Genetically Modified Crops and Food Security

            The role of genetically modified (GM) crops for food security is the subject of public controversy. GM crops could contribute to food production increases and higher food availability. There may also be impacts on food quality and nutrient composition. Finally, growing GM crops may influence farmers’ income and thus their economic access to food. Smallholder farmers make up a large proportion of the undernourished people worldwide. Our study focuses on this latter aspect and provides the first ex post analysis of food security impacts of GM crops at the micro level. We use comprehensive panel data collected over several years from farm households in India, where insect-resistant GM cotton has been widely adopted. Controlling for other factors, the adoption of GM cotton has significantly improved calorie consumption and dietary quality, resulting from increased family incomes. This technology has reduced food insecurity by 15–20% among cotton-producing households. GM crops alone will not solve the hunger problem, but they can be an important component in a broader food security strategy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Case studies: A hard look at GM crops.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                3 November 2014
                : 9
                : 11
                : e111629
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August-University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
                University of Perugia, Italy
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the research: WK MQ. Analyzed the data: WK MQ. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: WK MQ. Compiled the data: WK.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-28045
                10.1371/journal.pone.0111629
                4218791
                25365303
                88f6ec59-e41f-44f5-a9ad-669e817e27a8
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 23 June 2014
                : 3 October 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Funding
                This research was financially supported by the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2011) under Grant Agreement 290693 FOODSECURE. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Neither BMZ nor FOODSECURE and any of its partner organizations, any organization of the European Union or the European Commission are accountable for the content of this article.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Economics
                Agriculture
                Agricultural Biotechnology
                Genetically Modified Organisms
                Agrochemicals
                Herbicides
                Insecticides
                Crop Science
                Crops
                Agricultural Economics
                Agricultural Production
                Farms
                Pest Control
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Environmental Economics
                Science Policy
                Science Policy and Economics
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Economic Analysis
                Custom metadata
                The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article