2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Opportunistic Screening Techniques for Analysis of CT Scans

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose of Review

          Opportunistic screening is a combination of techniques to identify subjects of high risk for osteoporotic fracture using routine clinical CT scans prescribed for diagnoses unrelated to osteoporosis. The two main components are automated detection of vertebral fractures and measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) in CT scans, in which a phantom for calibration of CT to BMD values is not used. This review describes the particular challenges of opportunistic screening and provides an overview and comparison of current techniques used for opportunistic screening. The review further outlines the performance of opportunistic screening.

          Recent Findings

          A wide range of technologies for the automatic detection of vertebral fractures have been developed and successfully validated. Most of them are based on artificial intelligence algorithms. The automated differentiation of osteoporotic from traumatic fractures and vertebral deformities unrelated to osteoporosis, the grading of vertebral fracture severity, and the detection of mild vertebral fractures is still problematic. The accuracy of automated fracture detection compared to classical radiological semi-quantitative Genant scoring is about 80%. Accuracy errors of alternative BMD calibration methods compared to simultaneous phantom-based calibration used in standard quantitative CT (QCT) range from below 5% to about 10%. The impact of contrast agents, frequently administered in clinical CT on the determination of BMD and on fracture risk determination is still controversial.

          Summary

          Opportunistic screening, the identification of vertebral fracture and the measurement of BMD using clinical routine CT scans, is feasible but corresponding techniques still need to be integrated into the clinical workflow and further validated with respect to the prediction of fracture risk.

          Related collections

          Most cited references98

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique.

          The assessment of vertebral fracture by conventional radiography has been refined and improved using either semiquantitative or quantitative criteria. The inter- and intraobserver variability was determined for a semiquantitative visual approach that we routinely use in clinical studies for assessing prevalent and incident vertebral fractures. In addition, the semiquantitative approach was compared with a quantitative morphometric approach. The incidence and prevalence of vertebral fractures were determined in 57 postmenopausal women (age 65-75 years) by three independent observers. The radiographic basis for fracture definitions and the source of interobserver agreement for the semiquantitative technique. We conclude that the semiquantitative approach can be applied reliably in vertebral fracture assessment when performed using well-defined criteria.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications.

            Osteoporosis is a prevalent but underdiagnosed condition.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions.

              The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) has developed Official Positions for the clinical use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and non-DXA technologies. While only DXA can be used for diagnostic classification according to criteria established by the World Health Organization, DXA and some other technologies may predict fracture risk and be used to monitor skeletal changes over time. ISCD task forces reviewed the evidence for clinical applications of non-DXA techniques and presented reports with recommendations at the 2007 ISCD Position Development Conference. Here we present the ISCD Official Positions for quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and peripheral QCT (pQCT), with supporting medical evidence, rationale, controversy, and suggestions for further study. QCT is available for bone mineral density measurements at the spine, hip, forearm, and tibia. The ISCD Official Positions presented here focus on QCT of the spine and pQCT of the forearm. Measurements at the hip may have clinical relevance, as this is an important fracture site; however, due to limited medical evidence, definitive advice on its use in clinical practice cannot be provided until more data emerge.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Klaus.Engelke@imp.uni-erlangen.de
                Journal
                Curr Osteoporos Rep
                Curr Osteoporos Rep
                Current Osteoporosis Reports
                Springer US (New York )
                1544-1873
                1544-2241
                26 November 2022
                26 November 2022
                2023
                : 21
                : 1
                : 65-76
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.5330.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2107 3311, Department of Medicine III, , Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, University Hospital Erlangen, ; Ulmenweg 18, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.5330.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2107 3311, Institute of Medical Physics (IMP), , Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), ; Henkestr. 91, 91052 Erlangen, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9875-4123
                Article
                764
                10.1007/s11914-022-00764-5
                9925590
                36435912
                8af102fd-6e80-4267-89fa-373375703284
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 14 October 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100010571, Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie;
                Award ID: 01EC190B
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Imaging (H Isaksson and S Boyd, Section Editors)
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023

                Orthopedics
                computed tomography,opportunistic screening,fracture risk,vertebral fracture assessment,internal bmd calibration

                Comments

                Comment on this article