0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparing the quantum witness, the entropic Leggett–Garg inequality and the NCGD

      research-article
      1 , 2 , , 2
      Scientific Reports
      Nature Publishing Group UK
      Physics, Quantum physics

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this paper, we investigate the violation of the quantum witness, the entropic Leggett–Garg inequality (LGI) and the no-coherence-generating-and-detecting (NCGD) dynamics, under projective and coarsening measurements. We consider a qubit in the three scenarios: coherent dynamics, in the presence of dissipation, and in the presence of dephasing. For the pure qubit, we find that in the case of the projective measurement, the non-violation conditions of the quantum witness and the NCGD are the same; while the non-violation conditions of the entropic LGI and the quantum witness do not contain each other, i.e., a suitable conjunction of the quantum witness and the entropic LGI may be better for testing macrorealism. Also, for the pure qubit with coarsening measurement similar results can be obtained. For the dissipative qubit with projective measurement, the quantum witness and the NCGD can be both violated for a wider parameter regime than the entropic LGI. For the dissipative qubit with coarsening measurement, the violation of the NCGD is the most robust compared to the quantum witness and the entropic LGI. For the dephasing qubit with projective and coarsening measurements, the relationship among the quantum witness, the entropic LGI and the NCGD is similar to that of the pure qubit. In addition, we find that for pure, dissipative and dephasing qubits, the robustness of the coarsening measurement in final resolution is more vulnerable than that of the coarsening measurement in reference for the entropic LGI.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Die gegenw�rtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox

              J S Bell (1964)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                zhangyuxia0619@163.com
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                2 May 2024
                2 May 2024
                2024
                : 14
                : 10139
                Affiliations
                [1 ]College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, ( https://ror.org/04gtjhw98) Qingdao, 266590 China
                [2 ]School of Science, Qingdao University of Technology, ( https://ror.org/01qzc0f54) Qingdao, 266520 China
                Article
                60742
                10.1038/s41598-024-60742-y
                11066071
                38698176
                8c5659b3-12d0-4d1c-aa87-6f8646e7cedd
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 20 December 2023
                : 26 April 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809, National Natural Science Foundation of China;
                Award ID: 62201324
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007129, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province;
                Award ID: ZR2022QF065
                Award ID: ZR2022QA101
                Award ID: ZR2021LLZ001
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Key R&D Program of Shandong Province, China
                Award ID: 2023CXGC010901
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2024

                Uncategorized
                physics,quantum physics
                Uncategorized
                physics, quantum physics

                Comments

                Comment on this article