2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Proper RPA acetylation promotes accurate DNA replication and repair

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein complex RPA plays a critical role in promoting DNA replication and multiple DNA repair pathways. However, how RPA is regulated to achieve its functions precisely in these processes remains elusive. Here, we found that proper acetylation and deacetylation of RPA are required to regulate RPA function in promoting high-fidelity DNA replication and repair. We show that yeast RPA is acetylated on multiple conserved lysines by the acetyltransferase NuA4 upon DNA damage. Mimicking constitutive RPA acetylation or blocking its acetylation causes spontaneous mutations with the signature of micro-homology-mediated large deletions or insertions. In parallel, improper RPA acetylation/deacetylation impairs DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by the accurate gene conversion or break-induced replication while increasing the error-prone repair by single-strand annealing or alternative end joining. Mechanistically, we show that proper acetylation and deacetylation of RPA ensure its normal nuclear localization and ssDNA binding ability. Importantly, mutation of the equivalent residues in human RPA1 also impairs RPA binding on ssDNA, leading to attenuated RAD51 loading and homologous recombination repair. Thus, timely RPA acetylation and deacetylation likely represent a conserved mechanism promoting high-fidelity replication and repair while discriminating the error-prone repair mechanisms in eukaryotes.

          Graphical Abstract

          Graphical Abstract

          Proper RPA acetylation/deacetylation facilitates efficient or dynamic RPA binding on ssDNA. As a result, proper RPA acetylation favours the accurate DSB repair by gene conversion or BIR while suppressing spontaneous mutations and the error-prone alt-EJ or SSA repair mechanism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references93

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole genome sequences

          We analysed whole genome sequences of 560 breast cancers to advance understanding of the driver mutations conferring clonal advantage and the mutational processes generating somatic mutations. 93 protein-coding cancer genes carried likely driver mutations. Some non-coding regions exhibited high mutation frequencies but most have distinctive structural features probably causing elevated mutation rates and do not harbour driver mutations. Mutational signature analysis was extended to genome rearrangements and revealed 12 base substitution and six rearrangement signatures. Three rearrangement signatures, characterised by tandem duplications or deletions, appear associated with defective homologous recombination based DNA repair: one with deficient BRCA1 function; another with deficient BRCA1 or BRCA2 function; the cause of the third is unknown. This analysis of all classes of somatic mutation across exons, introns and intergenic regions highlights the repertoire of cancer genes and mutational processes operative, and progresses towards a comprehensive account of the somatic genetic basis of breast cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Causes and consequences of replication stress.

            Replication stress is a complex phenomenon that has serious implications for genome stability, cell survival and human disease. Generation of aberrant replication fork structures containing single-stranded DNA activates the replication stress response, primarily mediated by the kinase ATR (ATM- and Rad3-related). Along with its downstream effectors, ATR stabilizes and helps to restart stalled replication forks, avoiding the generation of DNA damage and genome instability. Understanding this response may be key to diagnosing and treating human diseases caused by defective responses to replication stress.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells

              The major pathways of DNA double strand break (DSB) repair have key roles in suppressing genomic instability. However, if deployed in an inappropriate cellular context, these same repair functions can mediate chromosome rearrangements that underlie various human diseases, ranging from developmental disorders to cancer. Two major mechanisms of DSB repair predominate in mammalian cells, namely homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining. In this Review, we outline a ‘decision tree’ of DSB repair pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells, and consider how DSB repair dysfunction can lead to genomic instability. Stalled or broken replication forks present a distinctive challenge to the DSB repair system. Emerging evidence suggests that the ‘rules’ governing stalled fork repair pathway choice differ from those that operate at a conventional DSB.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Nucleic Acids Res
                Nucleic Acids Res
                nar
                Nucleic Acids Research
                Oxford University Press
                0305-1048
                1362-4962
                23 June 2023
                04 May 2023
                04 May 2023
                : 51
                : 11
                : 5565-5583
                Affiliations
                Hubei Key Laboratory of Cell Homeostasis, College of Life Sciences, TaiKang Center for Life and Medical Sciences, Frontier Science Centre of Immunology and Metabolism, Wuhan University , Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
                The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, MOE Key Laboratory for Membraneless Organelles and Cellular Dynamics, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China , Hefei, Anhui 230001, China
                Hubei Key Laboratory of Cell Homeostasis, College of Life Sciences, TaiKang Center for Life and Medical Sciences, Frontier Science Centre of Immunology and Metabolism, Wuhan University , Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
                Hubei Key Laboratory of Cell Homeostasis, College of Life Sciences, TaiKang Center for Life and Medical Sciences, Frontier Science Centre of Immunology and Metabolism, Wuhan University , Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
                Hubei Key Laboratory of Cell Homeostasis, College of Life Sciences, TaiKang Center for Life and Medical Sciences, Frontier Science Centre of Immunology and Metabolism, Wuhan University , Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
                Hubei Key Laboratory of Cell Homeostasis, College of Life Sciences, TaiKang Center for Life and Medical Sciences, Frontier Science Centre of Immunology and Metabolism, Wuhan University , Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
                Hubei Key Laboratory of Cell Homeostasis, College of Life Sciences, TaiKang Center for Life and Medical Sciences, Frontier Science Centre of Immunology and Metabolism, Wuhan University , Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
                Department of Hematology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School , Nanjing, China
                Hubei Key Laboratory of Cell Homeostasis, College of Life Sciences, TaiKang Center for Life and Medical Sciences, Frontier Science Centre of Immunology and Metabolism, Wuhan University , Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
                The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, MOE Key Laboratory for Membraneless Organelles and Cellular Dynamics, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China , Hefei, Anhui 230001, China
                Beijing Key Laboratory of DNA Damage Response and College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University , Beijing 100048, China
                The MOE Key Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Cancer Molecular Cell Biology and Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University , Hangzhou 310058, China
                Hubei Key Laboratory of Cell Homeostasis, College of Life Sciences, TaiKang Center for Life and Medical Sciences, Frontier Science Centre of Immunology and Metabolism, Wuhan University , Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
                Author notes
                To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +86 27 68756827; Fax: +86 27 68756827; Email: xfchen@ 123456whu.edu.cn
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9487-191X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8622-3907
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3751-3283
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4615-4411
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7990-4111
                Article
                gkad291
                10.1093/nar/gkad291
                10287905
                37140030
                8d6fc038-e209-4d25-904c-a9d5b437f0aa
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 12 April 2023
                : 06 April 2023
                : 19 February 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 19
                Funding
                Funded by: National Key Research and Development Program of China, DOI 10.13039/501100012166;
                Award ID: 2021YFA1100503
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China, DOI 10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 32070573
                Award ID: 31872808
                Funded by: Taikang Center for Life and Medical Sciences;
                Funded by: Wuhan University Advanced Genetics Course Program;
                Categories
                AcademicSubjects/SCI00010
                Genome Integrity, Repair and Replication

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article