0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of sawbones training protocol in bone quality classification using tactile sensation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background/purpose

          Bone quality may affect the implantation protocol. This study aimed to assess whether training protocols could improve novice dental practitioners’ abilities in judging bone densities with tactile sensation.

          Materials and methods

          Twenty-five operators were recruited to evaluate the density of artificial polyurethane bone blocks by a 2-mm twist-drill drilling and reported the bone quality perceived in a 100-mm VAS line. Five blocks (densities: 0.08–0.48 g/cm 3) were used to simulate cancellous bone with extremely low to medium–high densities. Five tests were performed on three days, separated by one week and one month. A training session was arranged on the first day and the third day. In each test, the operator drilled a 0.8 g/cm 3 block as the reference (VAS = 100) and then the five test blocks in a randomized sequence. Each training session included a 0.8 g/cm 3 followed by five 0.16 and 0.32 g/cm 3 alternative block-drillings. VAS values and number of density-sequencing errors were analyzed with GLM repeated measures and Friedman test.

          Results

          While mean VAS values were significantly different among the five test blocks, it was not noticed in blocks of the same density between test sessions. Significant linear correlations were observed between VAS values and block densities. Training did not influence the VAS evaluation and hardness sequencing in general but training significantly reduced the sequencing errors in operators with inferior initial performance.

          Conclusion

          The proposed training protocol can improve the bone-quality perception among less experience dentists with poorer initial performance in bone density evaluation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis.

          The predictability of branemark implants has been well documented. High success rates in the maxilla and mandible in fully and partially edentulous patients can be expected. A host of factors may be attributed to the etiology of fixture loss. However, the quality of bone stands out as the single greatest determinant in fixture loss. Types I, II, and III bone offer good strength. Type IV bone has a thin cortex and poor medullary strength with low trabecular density. Ninety percent of 1,054 implants placed were in Types I, II, and III bone. Only 3% of these fixtures were lost; of the 10% of the fixtures placed in Type IV bone, 35% failed. Presurgical determination of Type IV bone may be one method to decrease implant failure.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The relative impact of local and endogenous patient-related factors on implant failure up to the abutment stage.

            The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of endogenous and local factors on the occurrence of implant failure up to the abutment stage. The study comprised a group of 399 consecutive patients, which represented the total of patients who had been treated from 1995 to 1997 (with a total of 1263 Brånemark Brån-system implants) at the Department of Periodontology of the University Hospital, Catholic University Leuven. For each patient, the medical history was carefully examined. Data collection and analysis were mainly focused on endogenous factors such as hypertension, osteoporosis, hypo- or hyperthyroid function, chemotherapy, diabetes type I or II, Crohn's disease, some local factors (e.g. bone quality, reason for tooth loss) and breach of sterility during surgery. The reason for tooth loss, smoking habits, radiotherapy and other local bone factors (bone quality and quantity) were also recorded. Implant failures were recorded up to the abutment connection. The present study indicated a success rate until this stage of 97.8%. General factors such as heavy smoking, chemotherapy plus poor bone quality increased implant failure rate. Radiotherapy, limited bone volume and claustrophobia, which led to breaching the strict preoperative rules of asepsis, appeared to be the most relevant local factors for early implant failures.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Bone classification: clinical-histomorphometric comparison.

              P Trisi, W Rao (1999)
              This study was aimed to correlate the hand clinical assessment of the bone quality to the histologic structure quantified by histomorphometric evaluation of bone density. Small bone biopsies were harvested in 56 patients during oral implant surgery, and were utilized for histomorphometric evaluation. The bone scoring was recorded during drilling of the implant bed, based on the hand-felt perception of the drilling resistance. The bone biopsies were then processed to obtain thin ground sections. The results of histomorphometric analysis were expressed as percentage of bony trabeculae over the total biopsy area, and the Spearman's rank correlation test, was applied to calculate the statistical differences of the clinically assessed classes of bone density and linear regression was calculated. Samples from the D1 showed a mean histomorphometric density of 76.54% +/- 16.19. Samples from D2 showed a mean value of 66.78% +/- 15.82. D3 specimens had a mean histomorphometric density scoring 59.61% +/- 19.55%. D4 samples had a mean value of 28.28% +/- 12.02. The interclass correlation analysis of the variance, showed that the clinically assessed classes D1 (P = 0.01) and D4 (P = 0.0006) were significantly different from the population. On the other hand, the classes D2 (P = 0.6) and D3 (P = 0.4) were not significantly different. This study demonstrated that hand feeling allows to distinguish, with statistically significant confidence, D1 and D4 bone, but failed to distinguish between the intermediate classes of bone quality.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Dent Sci
                J Dent Sci
                Journal of Dental Sciences
                Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
                1991-7902
                2213-8862
                03 January 2022
                April 2022
                03 January 2022
                : 17
                : 2
                : 897-902
                Affiliations
                [a ]School of Dentistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
                [b ]Department of Dentistry, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
                [c ]Graduate Institute of Clinical Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
                [d ]Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, 1 Chang-Te St., Taipei, 10016, Taiwan. Fax: +886223831346. lidehlin@ 123456ntu.edu.tw
                Article
                S1991-7902(21)00299-3
                10.1016/j.jds.2021.12.013
                9201665
                8e5296a0-5dd4-4fbe-b17d-f7e8143f2eed
                © 2021 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 28 November 2021
                : 14 December 2021
                Categories
                Original Article

                artificial bone blocks,bone quality,dental education,dental implant,tactile sensation

                Comments

                Comment on this article