10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Phytomicrobiome communications: Novel implications for stress resistance in plants

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The agricultural sector is a foremost contributing factor in supplying food at the global scale. There are plethora of biotic as well as abiotic stressors that act as major constraints for the agricultural sector in terms of global food demand, quality, and security. Stresses affect rhizosphere and their communities, root growth, plant health, and productivity. They also alter numerous plant physiological and metabolic processes. Moreover, they impact transcriptomic and metabolomic changes, causing alteration in root exudates and affecting microbial communities. Since the evolution of hazardous pesticides and fertilizers, productivity has experienced elevation but at the cost of impeding soil fertility thereby causing environmental pollution. Therefore, it is crucial to develop sustainable and safe means for crop production. The emergence of various pieces of evidence depicting the alterations and abundance of microbes under stressed conditions proved to be beneficial and outstanding for maintaining plant legacy and stimulating their survival. Beneficial microbes offer a great potential for plant growth during stresses in an economical manner. Moreover, they promote plant growth with regulating phytohormones, nutrient acquisition, siderophore synthesis, and induce antioxidant system. Besides, acquired or induced systemic resistance also counteracts biotic stresses. The phytomicrobiome exploration is crucial to determine the growth-promoting traits, colonization, and protection of plants from adversities caused by stresses. Further, the intercommunications among rhizosphere through a direct/indirect manner facilitate growth and form complex network. The phytomicrobiome communications are essential for promoting sustainable agriculture where microbes act as ecological engineers for environment. In this review, we have reviewed our building knowledge about the role of microbes in plant defense and stress-mediated alterations within the phytomicrobiomes. We have depicted the defense biome concept that infers the design of phytomicrobiome communities and their fundamental knowledge about plant-microbe interactions for developing plant probiotics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references242

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The plant immune system.

          Many plant-associated microbes are pathogens that impair plant growth and reproduction. Plants respond to infection using a two-branched innate immune system. The first branch recognizes and responds to molecules common to many classes of microbes, including non-pathogens. The second responds to pathogen virulence factors, either directly or through their effects on host targets. These plant immune systems, and the pathogen molecules to which they respond, provide extraordinary insights into molecular recognition, cell biology and evolution across biological kingdoms. A detailed understanding of plant immune function will underpin crop improvement for food, fibre and biofuels production.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications

            The worldwide increases in both environmental damage and human population pressure have the unfortunate consequence that global food production may soon become insufficient to feed all of the world's people. It is therefore essential that agricultural productivity be significantly increased within the next few decades. To this end, agricultural practice is moving toward a more sustainable and environmentally friendly approach. This includes both the increasing use of transgenic plants and plant growth-promoting bacteria as a part of mainstream agricultural practice. Here, a number of the mechanisms utilized by plant growth-promoting bacteria are discussed and considered. It is envisioned that in the not too distant future, plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) will begin to replace the use of chemicals in agriculture, horticulture, silviculture, and environmental cleanup strategies. While there may not be one simple strategy that can effectively promote the growth of all plants under all conditions, some of the strategies that are discussed already show great promise.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops

              Crop pathogens and pests reduce the yield and quality of agricultural production. They cause substantial economic losses and reduce food security at household, national and global levels. Quantitative, standardized information on crop losses is difficult to compile and compare across crops, agroecosystems and regions. Here, we report on an expert-based assessment of crop health, and provide numerical estimates of yield losses on an individual pathogen and pest basis for five major crops globally and in food security hotspots. Our results document losses associated with 137 pathogens and pests associated with wheat, rice, maize, potato and soybean worldwide. Our yield loss (range) estimates at a global level and per hotspot for wheat (21.5% (10.1-28.1%)), rice (30.0% (24.6-40.9%)), maize (22.5% (19.5-41.1%)), potato (17.2% (8.1-21.0%)) and soybean (21.4% (11.0-32.4%)) suggest that the highest losses are associated with food-deficit regions with fast-growing populations, and frequently with emerging or re-emerging pests and diseases. Our assessment highlights differences in impacts among crop pathogens and pests and among food security hotspots. This analysis contributes critical information to prioritize crop health management to improve the sustainability of agroecosystems in delivering services to societies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Microbiol
                Front Microbiol
                Front. Microbiol.
                Frontiers in Microbiology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-302X
                06 October 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 912701
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University , Amritsar, India
                [2] 2Department of Microbiology, DAV University , Jalandhar, India
                [3] 3Department of Zoology, Guru Nanak Dev University , Amritsar, India
                [4] 4State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University , Hangzhou, China
                [5] 5Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                [6] 6Department of Botany, S.P. College Srinagar , Jammu and Kashmir, India
                [7] 7Department of Biology, College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University , Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Mahaveer P. Sharma, ICAR Indian Institute of Soybean Research, India

                Reviewed by: Riyazali Zafarali Sayyed, P.S.G.V.P.M’s Arts, Science and Commerce College, India; Dongmei Lyu, McGill University, Canada

                *Correspondence: Kanika Khanna, kanika.27590@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Microbial Symbioses, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

                Article
                10.3389/fmicb.2022.912701
                9583171
                36274695
                8fb6a14d-f405-4ebe-9ae7-eba6eb1eef46
                Copyright © 2022 Khanna, Kohli, Sharma, Kour, Devi, Bhardwaj, Dhiman, Singh, Sharma, Sharma, Ohri, Bhardwaj, Ahmad, Alam and Albalawi.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 04 April 2022
                : 15 July 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 243, Pages: 27, Words: 20444
                Categories
                Microbiology
                Review

                Microbiology & Virology
                phytomicrobiome,rhizosphere,stresses,metabolomics,metagenomics,defense mechanisms,plant probiotics

                Comments

                Comment on this article