20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Deriving a Preference-Based Single Index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey

      , , ,
      Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article presents the results of a study to derive a preference-based single index from the SF-36. The study was an attempt to reconcile a profile health status measure, the SF-36, with the "quality adjusted life years" approach. The study undertook a parsimonious restructuring of the SF-36 using explicit criteria to form the SF-6D health state classification. A sample of multidimensional health states defined by this classification were valued by a convenience sample of health professionals, managers, and patients, who responded to a set of visual analogue scale ratings and standard gamble questions, with highly complete and consistent answers. Statistical models were estimated to predict single index scores for all 9000 health states defined by the new classification. The resultant algorithms can be applied to existing SF-36 data sets and used in the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of health technologies. This preliminary work forms the basis of a larger study currently being undertaken in the UK.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
          Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
          Elsevier BV
          08954356
          November 1998
          November 1998
          : 51
          : 11
          : 1115-1128
          Article
          10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00103-6
          9817129
          908d0a7b-5b8f-4d58-9576-60da803d0dc7
          © 1998

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article