12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Embryonic geometry underlies phenotypic variation in decanalized conditions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          During development, many mutations cause increased variation in phenotypic outcomes, a phenomenon termed decanalization. Phenotypic discordance is often observed in the absence of genetic and environmental variations, but the mechanisms underlying such inter-individual phenotypic discordance remain elusive. Here, using the anterior-posterior (AP) patterning of the Drosophila embryo, we identified embryonic geometry as a key factor predetermining patterning outcomes under decanalizing mutations. With the wild-type AP patterning network, we found that AP patterning is robust to variations in embryonic geometry; segmentation gene expression remains reproducible even when the embryo aspect ratio is artificially reduced by more than twofold. In contrast, embryonic geometry is highly predictive of individual patterning defects under decanalized conditions of either increased bicoid (bcd) dosage or bcd knockout. We showed that the phenotypic discordance can be traced back to variations in the gap gene expression, which is rendered sensitive to the geometry of the embryo under mutations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Waddington's canalization revisited: developmental stability and evolution.

          Most species maintain abundant genetic variation and experience a range of environmental conditions, yet phenotypic variation is low. That is, development is robust to changes in genotype and environment. It has been claimed that this robustness, termed canalization, evolves because of long-term natural selection for optimal phenotypes. We show that the developmental process, here modeled as a network of interacting transcriptional regulators, constrains the genetic system to produce canalization, even without selection toward an optimum. The extent of canalization, measured as the insensitivity to mutation of a network's equilibrium state, depends on the complexity of the network, such that more highly connected networks evolve to be more canalized. We argue that canalization may be an inevitable consequence of complex developmental-genetic processes and thus requires no explanation in terms of evolution to suppress phenotypic variation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An evolutionary ecology of individual differences.

            Individuals often differ in what they do. This has been recognised since antiquity. Nevertheless, the ecological and evolutionary significance of such variation is attracting widespread interest, which is burgeoning to an extent that is fragmenting the literature. As a first attempt at synthesis, we focus on individual differences in behaviour within populations that exceed the day-to-day variation in individual behaviour (i.e. behavioural specialisation). Indeed, the factors promoting ecologically relevant behavioural specialisation within natural populations are likely to have far-reaching ecological and evolutionary consequences. We discuss such individual differences from three distinct perspectives: individual niche specialisations, the division of labour within insect societies and animal personality variation. In the process, while recognising that each area has its own unique motivations, we identify a number of opportunities for productive 'cross-fertilisation' among the (largely independent) bodies of work. We conclude that a complete understanding of evolutionarily and ecologically relevant individual differences must specify how ecological interactions impact the basic biological process (e.g. Darwinian selection, development and information processing) that underpin the organismal features determining behavioural specialisations. Moreover, there is likely to be co-variation amongst behavioural specialisations. Thus, we sketch the key elements of a general framework for studying the evolutionary ecology of individual differences. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods.

              Most models of optimal progeny size assume that there is a trade-off between progeny size and number, and that progeny fitness increases with increasing investment per young. We find that both assumptions are supported by empirical studies but that the trade-off is less apparent when organisms are iteroparous, use adult-acquired resources for reproduction, or provide parental care. We then review patterns of variation in progeny size among species, among populations within species, among individuals within populations, and among progeny produced by a single female. We argue that much of the variation in progeny size among species, and among populations within species, is likely due to variation in natural selection. However, few studies have manipulated progeny environments and demonstrated that the relationship between progeny size and fitness actually differs among environments, and fewer still have demonstrated why selection favors different sized progeny in different environments. We argue that much of the variation in progeny size among females within populations, and among progeny produced by a single female, is probably nonadaptive. However, some species of arthropods exhibit plasticity in progeny size in response to several environmental factors, and much of this plasticity is likely adaptive. We conclude that advances in theory have substantially outpaced empirical data. We hope that this review will stimulate researchers to examine the specific factors that result in variation in selection on progeny size within and among populations, and how this variation in selection influences the evolution of the patterns we observe.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Reviewing Editor
                Role: Senior Editor
                Journal
                eLife
                Elife
                eLife
                eLife
                eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
                2050-084X
                12 February 2020
                2020
                : 9
                : e47380
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Mechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore SingaporeSingapore
                [2 ]CNRS and Turing Center for Living Systems, Centre de Physique Théorique, Aix-Marseille Université MarseilleFrance
                [3 ]Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore SingaporeSingapore
                [4 ]Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Proteos, A*Star SingaporeSingapore
                Weizmann Institute of Science Israel
                Weizmann Institute of Science Israel
                Weizmann Institute of Science Israel
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0551-1160
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5755-0060
                Article
                47380
                10.7554/eLife.47380
                7032927
                32048988
                92a572ed-a6b6-4887-806b-709431159ed3
                © 2020, Huang et al

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 03 April 2019
                : 11 February 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001381, National Research Foundation Singapore;
                Award ID: NRF2012NRF-NRFF001-094
                Award Recipient :
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Developmental Biology
                Custom metadata
                Gene regulatory networks incorporate information of the embryonic geometrical parameters to give rise to differential individual patterning outputs under decanalized genetics backgrounds.

                Life sciences
                canalization,pattern formation,inter-individual variation,scaling,d. melanogaster
                Life sciences
                canalization, pattern formation, inter-individual variation, scaling, d. melanogaster

                Comments

                Comment on this article