8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Factors Associated With Use of an Online Telemedicine Service to Access Self-managed Medical Abortion in the US

      research-article
      , MD, PhD 1 , 2 , , , PhD 3 , , MD, PhD 4
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This cross-sectional study assesses the reasons that individuals in the US are accessing self-managed medication abortion through online telemedicine services and the factors associated with these requests.

          Key Points

          Question

          What factors are associated with use of an online telemedicine service for accessing self-managed medication abortion in the US?

          Findings

          In this cross-sectional study of 57 506 individuals in 2458 counties, the cost of in-clinic care was the most commonly cited reason for accessing self-managed abortion using online telemedicine. At the county level, a 47-mile increase in distance to the nearest clinic was significantly associated with a 41% increase in requests, and a 10% increase in the population living below the federal poverty level was significantly associated with a 20% increase in requests.

          Meaning

          In this study, clinic access barriers were the most common reason for accessing self-managed medication abortion, and both distance to an abortion clinic and living below the federal poverty level were associated with higher demand for self-management.

          Abstract

          Importance

          People in the US have been seeking self-managed abortions outside the formal health care system using medications obtained through online telemedicine. However, little is known about this practice, including potential motivating factors.

          Objective

          To examine individual reasons for accessing medication abortion through an online telemedicine service as well as associations between state- and county-level factors and the rate of requests.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This population-based cross-sectional study examined all requests for self-managed medication abortion through an online consultation form available from Aid Access, a telemedicine service in the US, between March 20, 2018, and March 20, 2020.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Individual-level reasons for accessing the telemedicine service were examined as well as the rate of requests per 100 000 women of reproductive age by state. Zip code data provided by individuals making requests were used to examine county-level factors hypothesized to be associated with increased demand for self-managed abortion: distance to a clinic (calculated using location data for US abortion clinics) and the population proportion identifying as a member of a racial/ethnic minority group, living below the federal poverty level, and having broadband internet access (calculated using census data).

          Results

          During the 2-year study period, 57 506 individuals in 2458 counties in 50 states requested self-managed medication abortion; 52.1% were aged 20 to 29 years (mean [SD] age, 25.9 [6.7] years), 50.0% had children, and 99.9% were 10 weeks’ pregnant or less. The most common reasons cited by individuals making requests were the inability to afford in-clinic care (73.5%), privacy (49.3%), and clinic distance (40.4%). States with the highest rate of requests were Louisiana (202.7 per 100 000 women) and Mississippi (199.9 per 100 000 women). At the county level, an increase of 1 SD (47 miles) in distance to the nearest clinic was significantly associated with a 41% increase in requests (incidence rate ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.31-1.51; P < .001), and a 10% increase in the population living below the federal poverty level was significantly associated with a 20% increase in requests (incidence rate ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.13-1.28; P < .001).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this cross-sectional study, clinic access barriers were the most commonly cited reason for requesting self-managed medication abortion using an online telemedicine service. At the county level, distance to an abortion clinic and living below the federal poverty level were associated with a higher rate of requests. State and federal legislation could address these access barriers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Self-managed abortion: a systematic scoping review

          Self-managed abortion, when a person performs their own abortion without clinical supervision, is a model of abortion care used across a range of settings. To provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available literature on self-managed abortion, we conducted a systematic search for peer-reviewed research in April 2019 in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Popline, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Scielo, and Redalyc. We included studies that had a research question focused on self-managed abortion; and were published in English or Spanish. The combined search returned 7167 studies; after screening, 99 studies were included in the analysis. Included studies reported on methods, procurement, characteristics of those who self-managed, effectiveness, safety, reasons for self-managed abortion, and emotional and physical experiences. Numerous abortion methods were reported, most frequently abortion with pills and herbs. Studies reporting on self-managed medication abortion reported high-levels of effectiveness. We identify gaps in the research, and make recommendations to address those gaps.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.

            To evaluate the additional burdens experienced by Texas abortion patients whose nearest in-state clinic was one of more than half of facilities providing abortion that had closed after the introduction of House Bill 2 in 2013.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States

              CONTEXT Abortion availability and accessibility vary by state. Especially in areas where services are restricted or limited, some women travel to obtain abortion services in other states. Little is known about the experience of travel to obtain abortion. METHODS In January and February 2015, in-depth interviews were conducted with 29 patients seeking abortion services at six facilities in Michigan and New Mexico. Eligible women were 18 or older, spoke English, and had traveled either across state lines or more than 100 miles within the state. Respondents were asked to describe their experience from pregnancy discovery to the day of the abortion procedure. Barriers to accessing abortion care and consequences of these barriers were identified through inductive and deductive analysis. RESULTS Respondents described 15 barriers to abortion care while traveling to obtain services, and three major consequences of experiencing those barriers. Barriers were grouped into five categories: travel-related logistical issues, system navigation issues, limited clinic options, financial issues, and state or clinic restrictions. Consequences were delays in care, negative mental health impacts and considering self-induction. The experience of barriers complicated the process of obtaining an abortion, but the effect of any individual barrier was unclear. Instead, the experience of multiple barriers appeared to have a compounding effect, resulting in negative consequences for women traveling for abortion. CONCLUSION The amalgamation of barriers to abortion care experienced simultaneously can have significant consequences for patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                21 May 2021
                May 2021
                21 May 2021
                : 4
                : 5
                : e2111852
                Affiliations
                [1 ]LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin
                [2 ]Population Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin
                [3 ]Mathematica Policy Research Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts
                [4 ]Aid Access, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: April 4, 2021.
                Published: May 21, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11852
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Aiken ARA et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Abigail R. A. Aiken, MD, PhD, LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712 ( araa2@ 123456utexas.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Aiken had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Aiken, Starling.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Aiken, Starling.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Aiken, Gomperts.
                Statistical analysis: Aiken, Starling.
                Obtained funding: Aiken.
                Supervision: Aiken, Gomperts.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Aiken reported receiving grants from the Society of Family Planning and the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Gomperts reported being the founder and director of Aid Access and Women on Waves and receiving salary from Aid Access and Women on Waves outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This research was supported by grant SFPRF12-MA1 from the Society of Family Planning (Dr Aiken).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                zoi210355
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11852
                8140373
                34019085
                959b8190-5c9a-4a71-aaaf-a7a46579f9b9
                Copyright 2021 Aiken ARA et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 14 January 2021
                : 4 April 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Obstetrics and Gynecology

                Comments

                Comment on this article