21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Combined Effect of Sarcopenia and Systemic Inflammation on Survival in Patients with Advanced Stage Cancer Treated with Immunotherapy

      research-article
      1 , 4 , , 1 , 4 , 5 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 2 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 2
      The Oncologist
      John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
      Sarcopenia, Inflammation, Immunotherapy, Biomarkers, Risk stratification

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Sarcopenia and inflammation have been associated with poor survival in patients with cancer. We explored the combined effects of these variables on survival in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy.

          Methods

          We performed a retrospective review of 90 patients enrolled on immunotherapy‐based phase I clinical trials at Emory University from 2009 to 2017. Baseline neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, monocyte‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were used as surrogates of inflammation. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was derived from the skeletal muscle density calculated from baseline abdominal computed tomography images. Optimal cutoffs for continuous inflammation biomarkers and SMI were determined by bias‐adjusted log‐rank test. A four‐level risk stratification was used to create low‐risk (PLR <242 and nonsarcopenic), intermediate‐risk (PLR <242 and sarcopenic), high‐risk (PLR ≥242 and nonsarcopenic), and very‐high‐risk (PLR ≥242 and sarcopenic) groups with subsequent association with survival.

          Results

          Most patients (59%) were male, and the most common cancers were melanoma (33%) and gastrointestinal (22%). Very high‐risk, high‐risk, and intermediate‐risk patients had significantly shorter overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 8.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.65–27.01; p < .001; HR, 5.32; CI, 1.96–14.43; p = .001; and HR, 4.01; CI, 1.66–9.68; p = .002, respectively) and progression‐free survival (HR, 12.29; CI, 5.15–29.32; p < .001; HR, 3.51; CI, 1.37–9.02; p = .009; and HR, 2.14; CI, 1.12–4.10; p = .022, respectively) compared with low‐risk patients.

          Conclusion

          Baseline sarcopenia and elevated inflammatory biomarkers may have a combined effect on decreasing survival in immunotherapy‐treated patients in phase I trials. These data may be immediately applicable for medical oncologists for the risk stratification of patients beginning immunotherapeutic agents.

          Implications for Practice

          Sarcopenia and inflammation have been associated with poor survival in patients with cancer, but it is unclear how to apply this information to patient care. The authors created a risk‐stratification system that combined sarcopenia and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio as a marker of systemic inflammation. The presence of sarcopenia and systemic inflammation decreased progression‐free survival and overall survival in our cohort of 90 patients who received immunotherapy in phase I clinical trials. The data presented in this study may be immediately applicable for medical oncologists as a way to risk‐stratify patients who are beginning treatment with immunotherapy.

          Abstract

          The interaction between chronic inflammation and body composition is particularly important in the era of immunotherapy, considering that immune checkpoint inhibitors rely on the host immune system for their efficacy. This article reports on the combined effects of inflammation and sarcopenia on clinical outcomes in patients with solid tumors treated with immunotherapy‐based regimens.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico.

          Muscle mass decreases with age, leading to "sarcopenia," or low relative muscle mass, in elderly people. Sarcopenia is believed to be associated with metabolic, physiologic, and functional impairments and disability. Methods of estimating the prevalence of sarcopenia and its associated risks in elderly populations are lacking. Data from a population-based survey of 883 elderly Hispanic and non-Hispanic white men and women living in New Mexico (the New Mexico Elder Health Survey, 1993-1995) were analyzed to develop a method for estimating the prevalence of sarcopenia. An anthropometric equation for predicting appendicular skeletal muscle mass was developed from a random subsample (n = 199) of participants and was extended to the total sample. Sarcopenia was defined as appendicular skeletal muscle mass (kg)/height2 (m2) being less than two standard deviations below the mean of a young reference group. Prevalences increased from 13-24% in persons under 70 years of age to >50% in persons over 80 years of age, and were slightly greater in Hispanics than in non-Hispanic whites. Sarcopenia was significantly associated with self-reported physical disability in both men and women, independent of ethnicity, age, morbidity, obesity, income, and health behaviors. This study provides some of the first estimates of the extent of the public health problem posed by sarcopenia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Inflammation and sarcopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

            Inflammatory cytokines have been shown to prompt muscle wasting, ultimately stimulating protein catabolism and suppressing muscle synthesis. However, the possible association between inflammatory parameters and sarcopenia is poorly understood. We therefore aimed to summarize the current evidence about this topic with a meta-analysis of studies reporting serum inflammatory parameters in patients with sarcopenia vs. people without sarcopenia (controls). An electronic PubMed and Scopus search through to 09/01/2016 and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies comparing serum levels of inflammatory cytokines between patients with sarcopenia and controls was made, calculating random-effects standardized mean differences (SMDs) ±95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the effect size. Out of 1370 initial hits, 17 studies with a total of 11249 participants (3072 with sarcopenia and 8177 without) were meta-analyzed. Sarcopenic participants had significantly higher levels of CRP (SMD=0.51; 95%CI 0.26, 0.77; p<0.0001; I2=96%) than controls. Conversely, serum IL6 levels were not significantly different (SMD=0.35; 95%CI: -0.19, 0.89; p=0.21; I2=97%) in people with sarcopenia versus controls. Sarcopenic people did not have higher levels of TNF-α than controls (SMD=0.28; 95%CI -0.26, 0.83; p=0.31; I2=97%). In conclusion, sarcopenia seems to be associated with elevated serum CRP levels; future longitudinal studies are needed to clarify this relationship.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cancer cachexia, mechanism and treatment.

              It is estimated that half of all patients with cancer eventually develop a syndrome of cachexia, with anorexia and a progressive loss of adipose tissue and skeletal muscle mass. Cancer cachexia is characterized by systemic inflammation, negative protein and energy balance, and an involuntary loss of lean body mass. It is an insidious syndrome that not only has a dramatic impact on patient quality of life, but also is associated with poor responses to chemotherapy and decreased survival. Cachexia is still largely an underestimated and untreated condition, despite the fact that multiple mechanisms are reported to be involved in its development, with a number of cytokines postulated to play a role in the etiology of the persistent catabolic state. Existing therapies for cachexia, including orexigenic appetite stimulants, focus on palliation of symptoms and reduction of the distress of patients and families rather than prolongation of life. Recent therapies for the cachectic syndrome involve a multidisciplinary approach. Combination therapy with diet modification and/or exercise has been added to novel pharmaceutical agents, such as Megestrol acetate, medroxyprogesterone, ghrelin, omega-3-fatty acid among others. These agents are reported to have improved survival rates as well as quality of life. In this review, we will discuss the emerging understanding of the mechanisms of cancer cachexia, the current treatment options including multidisciplinary combination therapies, as well an update on new and ongoing clinical trials.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mbilen@emory.edu
                Journal
                Oncologist
                Oncologist
                10.1002/(ISSN)1549-490X
                ONCO
                theoncologist
                The Oncologist
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                1083-7159
                1549-490X
                05 December 2019
                March 2020
                : 25
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/onco.v25.3 )
                : e528-e535
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA
                [ 2 ] Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA
                [ 4 ] Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA
                [ 5 ] Departments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence: Mehmet A. Bilen, M.D., Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA. Telephone: 404‐778‐3693; e‐mail: mbilen@ 123456emory.edu
                [†]

                Contributed equally.

                [‡]

                Contributed equally as senior authors.

                Article
                ONCO13192
                10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0751
                7066707
                32162807
                9b9877eb-8623-40c9-9084-76b497a0b3ec
                © 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 01 October 2019
                : 31 October 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Pages: 8, Words: 5536
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100000054;
                Award ID: P30CA138292
                Categories
                26
                Immuno‐Oncology
                Immuno‐Oncology
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                March 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.7 mode:remove_FC converted:12.03.2020

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                sarcopenia,inflammation,immunotherapy,biomarkers,risk stratification
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                sarcopenia, inflammation, immunotherapy, biomarkers, risk stratification

                Comments

                Comment on this article