28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The power of simulation: a large‐scale narrative analysis of learners’ experiences

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4
      Medical Education
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context

          Simulation‐based education ( SBE) includes a broad spectrum of simulation activities, which are individually well researched. An extensive literature reports on SBE methods, topics and modalities, but there are limited studies investigating how simulation as a holistic phenomenon promotes learning.

          This study seeks to identify the ways in which health professionals narrate powerful SBE experiences and through this to understand in what ways SBE may influence learning.

          Methods

          Three hundred and twenty‐seven narratives about powerful learning through SBE were gathered from participants’ online reflections from a national faculty development programme in SBE. Narrative and thematic analyses were conducted on included texts, using ‘transformative learning theory’ as a sensitising notion.

          Results

          Narratives were categorised into the following categories: progress (267/327 = 81%); transformation (25/327 = 8%); practice (27/328 = 8%); and humiliation (8/327 = 2%). Recurrent features across narrative categories were as follows: early experiences in training; dramatic scenarios; developing appreciation of SBE; highly emotional experiences; things that ‘went wrong’; and ongoing reflection. Themes regarding mechanisms that supported learning were as follows: verisimilitude; feedback, debriefing and facilitation; observation of self and others; repetition of activities; and role‐playing the patient.

          Conclusions

          The results generally support the notion that SBE is experienced as a holistic phenomenon, rather than separate modalities. The narrative categories, recurrent features and learning themes tended to work across all simulation modalities, with the exception of ‘being in the patient's shoes’ being supported by role‐play in particular. Although powerful experiences were not necessarily transformative ones, they often occurred at formative stages of training. There was a strong sense that things going wrong in simulation scenarios (and the associated emotions and reflection) were a key part of learning. This underlines SBE's potential role in helping learners see fallibility as part of professional practice.

          Abstract

          The authors demonstrate that the features that make simulation powerful tend to span modalities and approaches, resonating many years after a learning experience has passed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Narrative Construction of Reality

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

              Educators increasingly use virtual patients (computerized clinical case simulations) in health professions training. The authors summarize the effect of virtual patients compared with no intervention and alternate instructional methods, and elucidate features of effective virtual patient design. The authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsychINFO, and Scopus through February 2009 for studies describing virtual patients for practicing and student physicians, nurses, and other health professionals. Reviewers, working in duplicate, abstracted information on instructional design and outcomes. Effect sizes were pooled using a random-effects model. Four qualitative, 18 no-intervention controlled, 21 noncomputer instruction-comparative, and 11 computer-assisted instruction-comparative studies were found. Heterogeneity was large (I²>50%) in most analyses. Compared with no intervention, the pooled effect size (95% confidence interval; number of studies) was 0.94 (0.69 to 1.19; N=11) for knowledge outcomes, 0.80 (0.52 to 1.08; N=5) for clinical reasoning, and 0.90 (0.61 to 1.19; N=9) for other skills. Compared with noncomputer instruction, pooled effect size (positive numbers favoring virtual patients) was -0.17 (-0.57 to 0.24; N=8) for satisfaction, 0.06 (-0.14 to 0.25; N=5) for knowledge, -0.004 (-0.30 to 0.29; N=10) for reasoning, and 0.10 (-0.21 to 0.42; N=11) for other skills. Comparisons of different virtual patient designs suggest that repetition until demonstration of mastery, advance organizers, enhanced feedback, and explicitly contrasting cases can improve learning outcomes. Virtual patients are associated with large positive effects compared with no intervention. Effects in comparison with noncomputer instruction are on average small. Further research clarifying how to effectively implement virtual patients is needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                margaret.bearman@deakin.edu.au
                Journal
                Med Educ
                Med Educ
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2923
                MEDU
                Medical Education
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0308-0110
                1365-2923
                18 October 2018
                April 2019
                : 53
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/medu.2019.53.issue-4 )
                : 369-379
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning Deakin University Geelong Victoria Australia
                [ 2 ] Rural Clinical School Flinders University Renmark South Australia Australia
                [ 3 ] Monash Institute for Health and Clinical Education Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia
                [ 4 ] Department of Surgery (Austin) University of Melbourne Heidelberg Victoria Australia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence: Margaret Bearman, Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Tel: +61 3 92468168; E‐mail: margaret.bearman@ 123456deakin.edu.au
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-9871
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2941-2298
                Article
                MEDU13747
                10.1111/medu.13747
                6518920
                30334299
                9dd69081-ba10-46f6-8b71-61bcaf6c832c
                © 2018 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 01 May 2018
                : 23 July 2018
                : 07 September 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Pages: 11, Words: 7316
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian federal Department of Health
                Categories
                Simulation
                Simulation
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                medu13747
                April 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.2.1 mode:remove_FC converted:15.05.2019

                Education
                Education

                Comments

                Comment on this article