25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Greater Emotional Gain from Giving in Older Adults: Age-Related Positivity Bias in Charitable Giving

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Older adults have been shown to avoid negative and prefer positive information to a higher extent than younger adults. This positivity bias influences their information processing as well as decision-making. We investigate age-related positivity bias in charitable giving in two studies. In Study 1 we examine motivational factors in monetary donations, while Study 2 focuses on the emotional effect of actual monetary donations. In Study 1, participants ( n = 353, age range 20–74 years) were asked to rate their affect toward a person in need and then state how much money they would be willing to donate to help this person. In Study 2, participants ( n = 108, age range 19–89) were asked to rate their affect toward a donation made a few days prior. Regression analysis was used to investigate whether or not the positivity bias influences the relationship between affect and donations. In Study 1, we found that older adults felt more sympathy and compassion and were less motivated by negative affect when compared to younger adults, who were motivated by both negative and positive affect. In Study 2, we found that the level of positive emotional reactions from monetary donations was higher in older participants compared to younger participants. We find support for an age-related positivity bias in charitable giving. This is true for motivation to make a future donation, as well as affective thinking about a previous donation. We conclude that older adults draw more positive affect from both the planning and outcome of monetary donations and hence benefit more from engaging in monetary charity than their younger counterparts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Spending money on others promotes happiness.

          Although much research has examined the effect of income on happiness, we suggest that how people spend their money may be at least as important as how much money they earn. Specifically, we hypothesized that spending money on other people may have a more positive impact on happiness than spending money on oneself. Providing converging evidence for this hypothesis, we found that spending more of one's income on others predicted greater happiness both cross-sectionally (in a nationally representative survey study) and longitudinally (in a field study of windfall spending). Finally, participants who were randomly assigned to spend money on others experienced greater happiness than those assigned to spend money on themselves.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory.

            As people get older, they experience fewer negative emotions. Strategic processes in older adults' emotional attention and memory might play a role in this variation with age. Older adults show more emotionally gratifying memory distortion for past choices and autobiographical information than younger adults do. In addition, when shown stimuli that vary in affective valence, positive items account for a larger proportion of older adults' subsequent memories than those of younger adults. This positivity effect in older adults' memories seems to be due to their greater focus on emotion regulation and to be implemented by cognitive control mechanisms that enhance positive and diminish negative information. These findings suggest that both cognitive abilities and motivation contribute to older adults' improved emotion regulation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations.

              Civil societies function because people pay taxes and make charitable contributions to provide public goods. One possible motive for charitable contributions, called "pure altruism," is satisfied by increases in the public good no matter the source or intent. Another possible motive, "warm glow," is only fulfilled by an individual's own voluntary donations. Consistent with pure altruism, we find that even mandatory, tax-like transfers to a charity elicit neural activity in areas linked to reward processing. Moreover, neural responses to the charity's financial gains predict voluntary giving. However, consistent with warm glow, neural activity further increases when people make transfers voluntarily. Both pure altruism and warm-glow motives appear to determine the hedonic consequences of financial transfers to the public good.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                15 June 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 846
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg, Sweden
                [2] 2Linköping University Linköping, Sweden
                [3] 3Decision Research, University of Oregon, Eugene OR, USA
                [4] 4Vienna University of Economics and Business Vienna, Austria
                Author notes

                Edited by: Emma V. Ward, Middlesex University, UK

                Reviewed by: Alexandre Schaefer, Monash University Malaysia, Malaysia; Paul Van Schaik, Monash University Malaysia, Malaysia

                *Correspondence: Pär Bjälkebring, par.bjalkebring@ 123456psy.gu.se

                This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00846
                4908114
                27378966
                9e6d4433-92a0-42d5-b67a-c6e2e27c979d
                Copyright © 2016 Bjälkebring, Västfjäll, Dickert and Slovic.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 01 January 2016
                : 20 May 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 41, Pages: 8, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: National Science Foundation 10.13039/100000001
                Funded by: Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd 10.13039/501100006636
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                charitable giving age,emotion,motivation,decision making
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                charitable giving age, emotion, motivation, decision making

                Comments

                Comment on this article