2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Systematic review of the results of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair in octogenarians

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          With the increasing life expectancy of Western populations, more octogenarians are presenting with large abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Endovascular repair offers a less invasive alternative and older patients who may not have been offered open repair in the past are now being considered for elective repair with this approach. Age in isolation may not be the only consideration in recommending elective aneurysm repair. We aimed to review the literature on complex endovascular AAA repairs (mainly fenestrated endovascular aortic repair [FEVAR]) in octogenarians.

          Methods

          A literature search was conducted using the Ovid Medline ®, Embase ® and Cochrane Library databases for articles published up to January 2022. All English language publications from 1995 onwards were eligible for inclusion. Search terms included: “FEVAR”, “F-EVAR”, “fenestrated EVAR”, “fenestrated endovascular aortic repair”, “fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair”, “fenestrated AAA repair”, “fenestrated endograft”, “fenestrated stent graft”, “fenestrated”, “endograft”, “EVAR”, “octogenarian”, “elderly”, “above 80” and “over 80”.

          Methods

          The literature search identified 134 potential articles. Following qualitative assessment by two independent appraisers, this was refined to 11 studies, in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement.

          Results

          The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality, which was highly variable, ranging from 0% to 9% in octogenarians and from 0% to 5% in non-octogenarians. However, these differences were only found to be statistically significant in two studies. The secondary outcome measures included technical success rates, major adverse events, reintervention rates, freedom from reintervention, target vessel patency, freedom from target branch instability, and length of hospital and intensive care unit stay. No statistically significant differences were found between octogenarians and non-octogenarians. Long-term survival was significantly lower for octogenarians in two studies.

          Conclusions

          The perioperative outcomes of FEVAR in octogenarians are comparable with those of younger patients. FEVAR therefore appears to be an acceptable option for complex endovascular aneurysm repairs in carefully selected octogenarians. Nevertheless, this review highlights the paucity of published data on the outcomes of endovascular repair of complex aneurysms in octogenarians.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Early results of fenestrated endovascular repair of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms in the United Kingdom.

          (2012)
          Fenestrated endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms has been proposed as an alternative to open surgery for juxtarenal and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. At present, the evidence base for this procedure is predominantly limited to single-center or single-operator series. The aim of this study was to present nationwide early results of fenestrated endovascular repair in the United Kingdom.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Meta‐analysis of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms over the last 10 years

            Background Juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms pose a significant challenge whether managed endovascularly or by open surgery. Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) is now well established, but few studies have compared it with open surgical repair (OSR). The aim of this systematic review was to compare short‐ and long‐term outcomes of FEVAR and OSR for the management of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. Methods A literature search was conducted of the Ovid Medline, EMBASE and PubMed databases. Reasons for exclusion were series with fewer than 20 patients, studies published before 2007 and those concerning ruptured aneurysms. Owing to variance in definitions, the terms ‘juxta/para/suprarenal’ were used; thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms were excluded. Primary outcomes were 30‐day/in‐hospital mortality and renal insufficiency. Secondary outcomes included major complication rates, rate of reintervention and rates of endoleak. Results Twenty‐seven studies were identified, involving 2974 patients. Study designs included 11 case series, 14 series within retrospective cohort studies, one case–control study and a single prospective non‐randomized trial. The pooled early postoperative mortality rate following FEVAR was 3·3 (95 per cent c.i. 2·0 to 5·0) per cent, compared with 4·2 (2·9 to 5·7) per cent after OSR. After FEVAR, the rate of postoperative renal insufficiency was 16·2 (10·4 to 23·0) per cent, compared with 23·8 (15·2 to 33·6) per cent after OSR. The major early complication rate following FEVAR was 23·1 (16·8 to 30·1) per cent versus 43·5 (34·4 to 52·8) per cent after OSR. The rate of late reintervention after FEVAR was higher than that after OSR: 11·1 (6·7 to 16·4) versus 2·0 (0·6 to 4·3) per cent respectively. Conclusion No significant difference was noted in 30‐day mortality; however, FEVAR was associated with significantly lower morbidity than OSR. Long‐term durability is a concern, with far higher reintervention rates after FEVAR.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Outcomes of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair among the elderly: endovascular versus open repair.

              National outcomes for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in elderly populations are needed. The purpose of this study was to analyze outcomes of endovascular (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) of elective AAA among the elderly (≥80 years). Patients undergoing non emergent AAA repair between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2008, were identified using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). Logistic regression models were used to compare risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes. Of 7,936 patients identified, 2,034 (25.6%) were ≥80 years. Older patients were more likely to experience adverse 30-day outcomes as compared with patients <80 years: overall morbidity (17.4% vs. 15.4%, OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.55) and mortality (2.6% vs. 1.4%, OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.37-2.90). A majority (80.8%) of patients ≥80 years were treated with EVAR, which was associated with lesser overall morbidity (13.6% vs 33.2%, OR 2.64, 95% CI 2.02-3.45) and mortality (1.8% vs 6.1%, OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.92-5.91) as compared with OSR. Multivariable analysis showed that elderly patients undergoing OSR, as compared with EVAR, had a greater likelihood of infectious (OR 3.48, 95% CI 2.51-4.83), pulmonary (OR 5.70, 95% CI 3.87-8.41), cardiac (OR 5.60, 95% CI 2.57-12.22), and renal complications (1.96, 95% CI 1.13-3.38), greater requirements for blood transfusion (OR 5.66, 95% CI 2.65-12.09), and longer duration of stay (OR 10.64, 95% CI 7.95-14.23). Although elderly patients have worse outcomes compared with younger patients regardless of approach, endovascular repair among elderly patients is associated with less morbidity and mortality compared with open repair. Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Ann R Coll Surg Engl
                Ann R Coll Surg Engl
                ann
                Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
                Royal College of Surgeons
                0035-8843
                1478-7083
                February 2024
                29 August 2023
                : 106
                : 2
                : 106-117
                Affiliations
                University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust , UK
                Author notes
                CORRESPONDENCE TO Mohamed Elahwal, E: mohamed.elahwal@ 123456nhs.net
                Article
                rcsann.2023.0032
                10.1308/rcsann.2023.0032
                10830342
                37642117
                9ec6566f-bc63-4edb-9350-c14078857016
                Copyright © 2024, The Authors

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction, and adaptation in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed.

                History
                : 4 April 2023
                Categories
                Review
                vas, Vascular surgery

                fevar – octogenarians – complex abdominal aortic aneurysm

                Comments

                Comment on this article