18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Partial Nephrectomy, a Comparison between Different Modalities: A Tertiary Care Center Experience

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Kidney cancer, with 4% of all malignancies, is one of the most common malignancies occurring among in adults. In Saudi Arabia, kidney cancer comprises 2.3% of all cancers, and its incidence has increased by 33%. Partial nephrectomy (PN) is considered as the gold standard for T1 renal masses.

          In this retrospective study, we did a chart review for all patients who underwent PNs between April 2013 and February 2019. Data comprised presentation, tumor size, type of procedure (open vs. laparoscopic vs. robotic), and intra- and post-operative complications. Chi-square, ANOVA, and cross-tabulation were done using SPSS software. P > 0.05 was considered significant. Approval was obtained from the institutional review board of King Abdullah International Medical Research Center.

          In all, 69 patients were identified: 26 (37.7%) males and 43 (62.3%) females, with mean age = 54.53 ± 13.21 years; mean body mass index = 32.36 ± 7.03, and mean tumor size = 3.7 ± 1.72 cm. In terms of presentation, most patients (50, 72.4%) presented incidentally as opposed to symptomatic presentation. Of these patients, 18 (26.1%) underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN), 29 (42%) laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), and 22 (31.9%) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). On comparing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) PN with OPN, we found that OPN had more blood loss and a longer hospital stay but a shorter operating room (OR) time.

          Results of PN irrespective of the procedure type, whether it was OPN, LPN, or RPN, were similar if performed by experienced surgeons. However, open procedures involved a higher blood loss, more operative time, and longer hospital stay when compared with minimally invasive techniques.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update.

          The European Association of Urology Guideline Group for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has prepared these guidelines to help clinicians assess the current evidence-based management of RCC and to incorporate the present recommendations into daily clinical practice. The recommendations provided in the current updated guidelines are based on a thorough review of available RCC guidelines and review articles combined with a systematic literature search using Medline and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A number of recent prospective randomised studies concerning RCC are now available with a high level of evidence, whereas earlier publications were based on retrospective analyses, including some larger multicentre validation studies, meta-analyses, and well-designed controlled studies. These guidelines contain information for the treatment of an individual patient according to a current standardised general approach. Updated recommendations concerning diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up can improve the clinical handling of patients with RCC. (c) 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth.

              Treatment decisions for renal malignancies depend largely on qualitative data, including a description of tumor anatomy and the experience of the treating surgeon. Currently characterization of renal tumor anatomical elements is descriptive and lacks standardization. Surgical decision making and data set comparisons would be significantly enhanced by a consistent, reproducible system that quantitates the pertinent characteristics of localized renal lesions. We have developed and propose a standardized nephrometry scoring system (R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score) to quantify the anatomical characteristics of renal masses on computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. The nephrometry score is based on 5 critical and reproducible anatomical features of solid renal masses. Of the 5 components 4 are scored on a 1, 2 or 3-point scale with the 5th indicating the anterior or posterior location of the mass relative to the coronal plane of the kidney. We applied the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score to 50 consecutive masses resected at Fox Chase Cancer Center. The R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score consists of (R)adius (tumor size as maximal diameter), (E)xophytic/endophytic properties of the tumor, (N)earness of tumor deepest portion to the collecting system or sinus, (A)nterior (a)/posterior (p) descriptor and the (L)ocation relative to the polar line. The suffix h (hilar) is assigned to tumors that abut the main renal artery or vein. The nephrometry scoring system accurately classified the complexity of 50 consecutive tumors undergoing excision at our institution. Standardized reporting of renal tumor size, location and depth is essential for decision making and effective comparisons. The R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score is a reproducible standardized classification system that quantitates the salient anatomy of renal masses. This novel approach for the systematic characterization of renal tumors provides a tool for meaningful comparisons of renal masses in clinical practice and in the urological literature.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Kidney Cancer VHL
                J Kidney Cancer VHL
                JKCVHL
                Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL
                Codon Publications
                2203-5826
                17 June 2021
                2021
                : 8
                : 2
                : 34-39
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Assistant Professor, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Division of Urology, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh14611, Saudi Arabia;
                [2 ]Urology Resident, Department of Urology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada;
                [3 ]College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Division of Urology, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh14611, Saudi Arabia;
                [4 ]Assistant Professer Urology Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Division of Urology, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh14611, Saudi Arabia
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Abdulmalik Addar, Urology resident, Department of Urology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada. E-mail: Abdulmalikaddar@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                JKCVHL-8-034
                10.15586/jkcvhl.v8i2.179
                8215000
                34178584
                a0985ee6-64d7-42aa-a7b1-e050c5e752e8
                Copyright: Asker AA et al.

                This open access article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                History
                : 08 March 2021
                : 27 May 2021
                Categories
                Original Article

                partial nephrectomy,robotic surgrey,nephron sparing,ischemia time

                Comments

                Comment on this article