0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH): A Rare Cause of Primary Engraftment Failure Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplant

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a devastating disorder of uncontrolled immune activation characterized by clinical and laboratory evidence of extreme inflammation, occurring either as a familial or a secondary HLH, which is acquired in association with a variety of pathological states. 1 In recent years, HLH has attracted growing attention due to an inexplicable rise in the interest of physicians in recognizing and reporting the disorder. Clinical features may vary from a typical presentation with fever, cytopenia, hepatosplenomegaly to atypical complications such as rash, hepatitis or acute liver failure, coagulopathy, and central nervous system (CNS) involvement, which manifest as an altered mental status, seizures, and focal deficits. 2 Unfortunately, the diagnosis of HLH is often delayed due to the intricacies of the established diagnostic criteria 1 of this deadly disease, which leads to irony as HLH needs a very fast and accurate diagnosis to prevent mortality. It is also worthy to be aware of the fact that diagnosis of HLH does not fundamentally depend upon morphological findings of hemophagocytosis as it can be absent in the early stages of the disease. Hence, it would be wise to perform serial bone marrow aspirations later in the course of the disease if the clinical suspicion is very high. 3 HLH post stem cell transplant, either autologous or allogeneic, is a very rare complication, which involves the complexities of the diagnosis due to various confounding factors commonly encountered in the peri-transplant period. In addition to that, it is a known fact that it is associated with high mortality. 4 A separate set of criteria for HLH after SCT has been proposed requires two major criteria, or one major and all four minor criteria. The major criteria are 1 engraftment failure, delayed engraftment or secondary engraftment failure after SCT, and 2 histopathological evidence of hemophagocytosis. The four minor criteria are high-grade fever, hepatosplenomegaly, elevated ferritin, and elevated serum LDH. 5 A prospective observational study on 171 post stem cell transplantation (68 allogeneic and 103 autologous) showed 6 cases of secondary HLH in allogeneic transplants, whereas only 1 case was reported in autologous transplant cases which clearly highlights the rarity of this complication. 6 We hereby present the case of a young male recipient of an autologous stem cell transplant for his primary disease of diffuse large B cell lymphoma, leading to primary graft failure secondary to HLH. Case Presentation We describe the case of a 50-year-old male patient, who was diagnosed with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)-non-germinal center type Stage IV in April 2019, received 6 cycles of RCHOP that showed good response to treatment on PET scan at the end of the therapy. The patient presented again in February 2021 with progressively enlarging cervical lymph nodes. PET CT confirmed the progression of the disease. Bone marrow was not involved. At relapse, the disease was in stage IV as supradiaphragmatic and infra diaphragmatic nodes were involved along with the liver. He was salvaged with 4 cycles of RDHAP with which he could achieve a partial response. The patient was taken for an autologous transplant for further disease control. He received BEAM conditioning regimen at the doses: carmustine @ 300 mg/sqm on day-6, cyatrabine @200 mg/sqm on day-5 to -2, etoposide @ 200 mg/sqm on day-5 to -2, melphalan @ 120 mg/sqm on day-1 followed by infusion of autologous stem cells (G-CSF and plerixafor mobilized) at dose of 5.1 × 10 6 /kg on day 0. On day + 4, the patient developed oral and abdominal mucositis grade III. Subsequently, on day + 6, he also had a septicemic shock and required antibiotics along with inotropic support. Growth factor support was continued since day + 1. In view of the deterioration in his clinical condition, granulocyte infusions were also given. Initially around day + 16, the patient had a favorable evolution of the white blood cell count reaching 200/mm 3 on day + 18 only to start falling off again on day + 21 (to 90/mm 3 ). He remained to be febrile throughout the course and hence workup for secondary HLH was initiated. Although the bone marrow was hypocellular with <5% cellularity with occasional hemophagocytosis ( Fig. 1 ), other parameters such as engraftment failure, high-grade fever, elevated ferritin (3,660 ng/mL) were fulfilling the criteria of post-transplant secondary HLH as defined by Takagi et al in post-HSCT setting, which requires either both major criteria (first major criterion comprises engraftment failure, delayed engraftment, or secondary engraftment failure after HSCT and the second is histopathological evidence of hemophagocytosis), or one major and all four minor criteria (high-grade fever, hepatosplenomegaly, elevated ferritin, and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase). 5 With triglyceride levels of 362 mg/dL, fibrinogen 565 mg/dL, and procalcitonin 1.0 ng/mL, his H score was 253. Elevated serum IL2R levels (26,638 pg/mL, normal range: 1,555–10,800 pg/mL) consolidated our diagnosis of HLH, before starting steroids. Viral PCRs for CMV, EBV, and respiratory viruses were done to rule out infections related to HLH; however, all were negative. He was initiated on dexamethasone on day + 24 along with IvIg (immunoglobulin) @ 1 mg/kg/day for 2 days. Later on, cyclosporine was also added on day + 25. On day + 27, an increasing trend in WBC was observed. On day + 29, neutrophil engraftment was achieved (ANC > 500 mm 3 ). The steroid was started to be tapered off thereafter and was stopped as the patient developed Pseudomonas bacteremia. The patient could not tolerate cyclosporine due to raised creatinine and hyperkalemia, and hence it was stopped on day + 40. His platelet count continued to be low and required repeated transfusions. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy were repeated on day+ 41, which revealed occasional histiocytosis although the cellularity was still low (<5% cellularity) ( Fig. 2 ). In view of persistent severe thrombocytopenia, immunoglobulin (Ig) administration was repeated every 3 weeks. However, IgG levels were not checked before every dose of Ig administration. At the time of writing this report, the patient continued to have a low-grade fever with no localizing focus for infection. He has been continued on eltrombopag (thrombopoietin receptor agonist) since day + 50 for the platelet engraftment until his last follow-up day (day + 61) ( Fig. 1 ). Fig. 1 This figure depicts the clinical course of the patient post autologous until the last follow-up (duration between the days is not according to the scale). The patient received BEAM (carmustine/etoposide/cytarabine/melphalan) conditioning regimen. Day 0 represents the days of autologous transplant (CD34 dose was 5.1 × 10 6 /kg). From day + 1, G-CSF was started as a part of the protocol. On day + 4, mucositis started followed by hypotension on day + 6. He was managed with antibiotic support along with granulocyte infusions. TLC started rising gradually until day + 18 only to have a failing trend again by day + 21. On day + 23, bone marrow examination showed hemophagocytosis. The patient received IvIg (immunoglobulin) and steroid from day + 24. Cyclosporine was added on day + 25. TLC started rising by day + 29 (ANC > 500/mm 3 ). On day + 35, the steroid was stopped due to Pseudomonas bacteremia. By day + 37, G-CSF was also stopped on day + 41 due to a rise in creatinine and persistent hyperkalemia. Repeat bone marrow examination on day + 41 showed occasional hemophagocytic cells. In view of persistent thrombocytopenia, eltrombopag was added on day + 50. On the last follow-up (day + 61), the patient had TLC 10,540/mm 3 and platelets 32,000/mm 3 without transfusion support. Fig. 2 Progressive improvement in cellularity, with few histiocytoses showing iron pigment deposition in the cytoplasm. Discussion The occurrence of the HLH phenomenon post-transplant, although rare, is a well-known entity. It can complicate both allogeneic and autologous transplants leading to high mortality. 4 5 It could be related to infections, mainly viral, or could be independent of any reason. 7 One of the challenging tasks for a clinician is to differentiate HLH from other variety of systemic inflammatory syndromes, including disseminated intravascular coagulation, capillary leak syndrome, engraftment syndrome, and infection-associated macrophage activation syndrome. 8 Also, ferritin is a ubiquitously expressed protein, and the specificity of ferritin for HLH is questionable, particularly in transplant settings. However, primary engraftment failure is a rare complication post autologous transplant; a few case reports support this evidently. Fukuno et al reported a case of B-NHL with graft failure post auto SCT. 9 Although the patient received high-dose methylprednisolone, the patient succumbed to multiorgan failure. Similarly, HLH post autologous for multiple myeloma has also been reported. 10 In contrast, reporting of secondary HLH in allogeneic transplants is relatively common in the literature. Abe et al have shared their experience of two cases of secondary HLH post allogeneic transplant for lymphoma. 11 An interesting prospective observational study by Abdelkefi et al reported the incidence of HLH after SCT in a single institution over 18 months. They found 8.8% incidence in alloSCT vs. 0.9% in auto SCT. In spite of aggressive treatment, half of the patients with HLH died in their study, which emphasizes the dreadfulness of this rare complication. 6 Recently, EBMT has reported an estimated rate following allogeneic HSCT of 1.09% and much lower estimate of 0.15% following autologous HSCT. In their report, the median cut-off value of ferritin deemed significant was 3,000 μg/L (1,000–10,000 μg/L). However, EBMT commented that what constitutes significant hyperferritinemia in the post-HSCT setting is still undefined and further study is needed to define appropriate cut-off ranges to inform novel screening and diagnostic criteria. 12 In the experience of Colita et al, there was only 1 case of HLH out of the 22 patients receiving auto-SCT in 18 months (incidence: 4.5%.). 3 It was also emphasized that the conditioning regimens such as BEAM that contain etoposide have no protective effect against HLH. As shown in various studies and case reports, HLH has a poor outcome despite aggressive therapy. Albeit, there is no specific recommendation for posttransplant HLH, therapy ranges from corticosteroids, cyclosporine A, low-dose etoposide, intravenous immunoglobulins to the second transplant in case of refractory cases. 3 10 In this present report, our patient faced primary graft failure secondary to HLH post autologous transplant. This patient had no clinical features of engraftment syndrome as there were no rashes and weight gain. Also, we ruled out sepsis with low procalcitonin and repeated negative blood cultures. He attained neutrophil engraftment post steroids and cyclosporine. Nonetheless, platelet engraftment could not be achieved which prompted us to start a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (eltrombopag). We also encountered renal toxicity due to cyclosporine and hence it could not be continued for a longer duration. Conclusion Posttransplant HLH is a rare but possible cause of primary graft failure in autologous stem cell transplants. Whenever sustained fever with cytopenia and hyperferritinemia is observed, a differential diagnosis of secondary HLH should be acknowledged. The most important aspect is prompt recognition and initiation of the treatment, which could be lifesaving. Our patient was mobilized with a GCSF alone peripheral blood graft. It would be intriguing to explore whether immune-mediated complications differ between a chemo-mobilized graft versus G-CSF alone graft.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          How I treat hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in the adult patient.

          Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a devastating disorder of uncontrolled immune activation characterized by clinical and laboratory evidence of extreme inflammation. This syndrome can be caused by genetic mutations affecting cytotoxic function (familial HLH) or be secondary to infectious, rheumatologic, malignant, or metabolic conditions (acquired HLH). Prompt recognition is paramount and, without early treatment, this disorder is frequently fatal. Although HLH is well described in the pediatric population, less is known about the appropriate work-up and treatment in adults. Here, we review the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of HLH in adults.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nationwide survey of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in Japan.

            Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), a disorder of the mononuclear phagocyte system, can be classified into two distinct forms: primary HLH (FHL) and secondary HLH. To clarify the epidemiology and clinical outcome for each HLH subtype, we conducted a nationwide survey of HLH in Japan. Since 799 patients were diagnosed in 292 institutions of Japan between 2001 and 2005, the annual incidence of HLH was estimated as 1 in 800,000 per year. Among them, 567 cases were actually analyzed in this study. The most frequent subtype was Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated HLH, followed by other infection- or lymphoma-associated HLH. Age distribution showed a peak of autoimmune disease- and infection-associated HLH in children, while FHL and lymphoma-associated HLH occurred almost exclusively in infants and the elderly, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate exceeded 80% for patients with EBV- or other infection-associated HLH, was intermediate for those with FHL or B-cell lymphoma-associated HLH, and poor for those with T/NK cell lymphoma-associated HLH (<15%). Although this nationwide survey establishes the heterogeneous characteristics of HLH, the results should be useful in planning prospective studies to identify the most effective therapy for each HLH subtype.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Diagnosis and Management of Secondary HLH/MAS Following HSCT and CAR-T Cell Therapy in Adults; A Review of the Literature and a Survey of Practice Within EBMT Centres on Behalf of the Autoimmune Diseases Working Party (ADWP) and Transplant Complications Working Party (TCWP)

              Introduction: Secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) or Macrophage Activation Syndrome (MAS) is a life-threatening hyperinflammatory syndrome that can occur in patients with severe infections, malignancy or autoimmune diseases. It is also a rare complication of haematopoetic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with a high mortality. It may be associated with graft vs. host disease in the allogeneic HSCT setting. It is also reported following CAR-T cell therapy, but differentiation from cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is challenging. Here, we summarise the literature and present results of a survey of current awareness and practice in EBMT-affiliated centres of sHLH/MAS following HSCT and CAR-T cell therapy. Methods: An online questionnaire was sent to the principal investigators of all EBMT member transplant centres treating adult patients (18 years and over) inviting them to provide information regarding: number of cases of sHLH/MAS seen in their centre over 3 years (2016–2018 inclusive); screening strategies and use of existing diagnostic/classification criteria and treatment protocols. Results: 114/472 centres from 24 different countries responded (24%). We report estimated rates of sHLH/MAS of 1.09% (95% CI = 0.89–1.30) following allogeneic HSCT, 0.15% (95% CI = 0.09–5.89) following autologous HSCT and 3.48% (95% CI = 0.95–6.01) following CAR-T cell therapy. A majority of centres (70%) did not use a standard screening protocol. Serum ferritin was the most commonly used screening marker at 78% of centres, followed by soluble IL-2 receptor (24%), triglycerides (15%), and fibrinogen (11%). There was significant variation in definition of “clinically significant” serum ferritin levels ranging from 500 to 10,000 μg/mL. The most commonly used criteria to support diagnosis were HLH-2004 (43%) and the H score (15%). Eighty percent of responders reported using no standard management protocol, but reported using combinations of corticosteroids, chemotherapeutic agents, cytokine blockade, and monoclonal antibodies. Conclusions: There is a remarkable lack of consistency between EBMT centres in the approach to screening, diagnosis and management. Further research in this field is needed to raise awareness of and inform harmonised, evidence-based approaches to the recognition and treatment of sHLH/MAS following HSCT/CAR-T cell therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                South Asian J Cancer
                South Asian J Cancer
                10.1055/s-00049561
                South Asian Journal of Cancer
                Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. (A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India )
                2278-330X
                2278-4306
                12 August 2023
                July 2023
                1 August 2023
                : 12
                : 3
                : 229-232
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, Delhi, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Pallavi Mehta, MD, DM (Clinical Hematology) Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre Sector 5, Rohini, New Delhi 110085India dr_pallavimehta@ 123456yahoo.co.in
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8743-1801
                Article
                21110680
                10.1055/s-0042-1748183
                10691904
                38047043
                a3169662-2535-4e64-931e-f9cded5c3aff
                MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Editorial

                Comments

                Comment on this article