28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      High‐definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD‐tDCS) of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects performance in Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Studies on risk preferences have long been of great concern and have examined the neural basis underlying risk‐based decision making. However, studies using conventional transcranial direct current stimulation ( tDCS) revealed that bilateral stimulation could change risk propensity with limited evidence of precisely focalized unilateral high‐definition transcranial direct current stimulation ( HDtDCS). The aim of this experiment was to investigate the effect of HDtDCS focalizing the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex ( DLPFC) on risk‐taking behavior during the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).

          Methods

          This study was designed as a between‐subject, single‐blind, sham‐controlled experiment. University students were randomly assigned to three groups: the anodal group (F3 anode, AF3, F1, F5, FC3 returned), the cathodal group (F3 cathodal, AF3, F1, F5, FC3 returned) and the sham group. Subsequently, 1.5‐mA 20‐min HDtDCS was applied during the BART, and the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale ( PANAS), the Sensation Seeking Scale‐5 ( SSS‐5), and the Behavioral Inhibition System and Behavioral Approach System scale ( BIS/ BAS) were measured as control variables.

          Results

          The cathodal group earned less total money than the sham group, and no significant difference was observed between the anodal group and the sham group.

          Conclusions

          These results showed that, to some extent, focalized unilateral cathodal HDtDCS on left DLPFC could change performance during risky tasks and diminish risky decision making. Further studies are needed to investigate the dose effect and electrode distribution of HDtDCS during risky tasks and examine synchronous brain activity to show the neural basis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.

          In this paper we demonstrate in the intact human the possibility of a non-invasive modulation of motor cortex excitability by the application of weak direct current through the scalp. Excitability changes of up to 40 %, revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation, were accomplished and lasted for several minutes after the end of current stimulation. Excitation could be achieved selectively by anodal stimulation, and inhibition by cathodal stimulation. By varying the current intensity and duration, the strength and duration of the after-effects could be controlled. The effects were probably induced by modification of membrane polarisation. Functional alterations related to post-tetanic potentiation, short-term potentiation and processes similar to postexcitatory central inhibition are the likely candidates for the excitability changes after the end of stimulation. Transcranial electrical stimulation using weak current may thus be a promising tool to modulate cerebral excitability in a non-invasive, painless, reversible, selective and focal way.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test.

            Bayesian estimation for 2 groups provides complete distributions of credible values for the effect size, group means and their difference, standard deviations and their difference, and the normality of the data. The method handles outliers. The decision rule can accept the null value (unlike traditional t tests) when certainty in the estimate is high (unlike Bayesian model comparison using Bayes factors). The method also yields precise estimates of statistical power for various research goals. The software and programs are free and run on Macintosh, Windows, and Linux platforms. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study.

              In this study, 306 individuals in 3 age groups--adolescents (13-16), youths (18-22), and adults (24 and older)--completed 2 questionnaire measures assessing risk preference and risky decision making, and 1 behavioral task measuring risk taking. Participants in each age group were randomly assigned to complete the measures either alone or with 2 same-aged peers. Analyses indicated that (a) risk taking and risky decision making decreased with age; (b) participants took more risks, focused more on the benefits than the costs of risky behavior, and made riskier decisions when in peer groups than alone; and (c) peer effects on risk taking and risky decision making were stronger among adolescents and youths than adults. These findings support the idea that adolescents are more inclined toward risky behavior and risky decision making than are adults and that peer influence plays an important role in explaining risky behavior during adolescence.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                xchzhang@bnu.edu.cn
                Journal
                Brain Behav
                Brain Behav
                10.1002/(ISSN)2157-9032
                BRB3
                Brain and Behavior
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2162-3279
                11 January 2018
                February 2018
                : 8
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/brb3.2018.8.issue-2 )
                : e00884
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education Faculty of Psychology Beijing Normal University Beijing China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Xichao Zhang, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

                Email: xchzhang@ 123456bnu.edu.cn

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9732-4604
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8839-4678
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9630-0988
                Article
                BRB3884
                10.1002/brb3.884
                5822580
                30506982
                a4eeb6f9-fb37-4672-899e-d7ae0f1485ca
                © 2018 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 June 2017
                : 17 October 2017
                : 26 October 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 2, Pages: 11, Words: 8954
                Funding
                Funded by: Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
                Award ID: SKZZA2015012
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                brb3884
                February 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.3.2.2 mode:remove_FC converted:20.02.2018

                Neurosciences
                decision making,high‐definition transcranial direct current stimulation,left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex,risk‐taking

                Comments

                Comment on this article