24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of drug reminder packaging on medication adherence: a systematic review revealing research gaps

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This was a systematic review of the literature in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Evidence mapping was used to reveal the effect of drug reminder packaging on medication adherence, to identify research gaps and to make suggestions for future research.

          Methods

          PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched with an end date of September 2013 using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) term ‘medication adherence’ and 20 different search terms for ‘drug reminder packaging’, limited to the English and German languages. Additional references were identified through cross-referencing. All prospective controlled trials with an intervention using drug reminder packaging for patients taking at least one medication without the assistance of a health-care professional were included in the evidence mapping of the effect of drug reminder packaging on adherence and outcomes according to the Economic, Clinical and Humanistic Outcomes (ECHO) model.

          Results

          A total of 30 studies met the inclusion criteria: 10 randomized controlled trials, 19 controlled clinical trials and 1 cohort study. Drug reminder packaging had a significant effect on at least one adherence parameter in 17 studies (57%). The methodological quality was strong in five studies. Two studies provided complete information. Clear research gaps emerged.

          Conclusions

          Overall, the studies showed a positive effect of drug reminder packaging on adherence and clinical outcomes. However, poor reporting and important gaps like missing humanistic and economic outcomes and neglected safety issues limit the drawing of firm conclusions. Suggestions are made for future research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals.

              Although randomised trials are important for evidence-based medicine, little is known about their overall characteristics. We assessed the epidemiology and reporting of methodological details for all 519 PubMed-indexed randomised trials published in December, 2000 (383 [74%] parallel-group, 116 [22%] crossover). 482 (93%) were published in specialty journals. A median of 80 participants (10th-90th percentile 25-369) were recruited for parallel-group trials. 309 (60%) were blinded. Power calculation, primary outcomes, random sequence generation, allocation concealment, and handling of attrition were each adequately described in less than half of publications. The small sample sizes are worrying, and poor reporting of methodological characteristics will prevent reliable quality assessment of many published trials.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Syst Rev
                Syst Rev
                Systematic Reviews
                BioMed Central
                2046-4053
                2014
                24 March 2014
                : 3
                : 29
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
                [2 ]University Hospital Basel, Hospital-Pharmacy, Spitalstrasse 26, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
                Article
                2046-4053-3-29
                10.1186/2046-4053-3-29
                4234982
                24661495
                a4f4537f-c257-4309-a88a-0c617ccb0d85
                Copyright © 2014 Boeni et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 10 December 2013
                : 13 March 2014
                Categories
                Research

                Public health
                medication adherence,patient compliance,polypharmacy,drug reminder packaging,multicompartment adherence aid,pillbox,multidrug punch card,blister pouch,dose-dispensing service

                Comments

                Comment on this article