5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      “Our fear is finished,” but nothing changes: efforts of marginalized women to foment state accountability for maternal health care in a context of low state capacity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Women in India are often asked to make informal payments for maternal health care services that the government has mandated to be free. This paper is a descriptive case study of a social accountability project undertaken by SAHAYOG, a nongovernmental organization in Uttar Pradesh, India. SAHAYOG worked with community-based organizations and a grassroots forum comprised of low caste, Muslim, and tribal women to decrease the prevalence of health provider demands that women and their families make informal payments.

          Methods

          The study entailed document review; interviews and focus group discussions with program implementers, governmental stakeholders, and community activists; and participant observation in health facilities.

          Results

          The study found that SAHAYOG adapted their strategy over time to engender greater empowerment and satisfaction among program participants, as well as greater impact on the health system. Participants gained knowledge resources and agency; they learned about their entitlements, had access to mechanisms for complaints, and, despite risk of retaliation, many felt capable of demanding their rights in a variety of fora. However, only program participants seemed successfully able to avoid making informal payments to the health sector; health providers still demanded that other women make payments. Several features of the micro and macro context shaped the trajectory of SAHAYOG’s efforts, including deeply rooted caste dynamics, low provider commitment to ending informal payments, the embeddedness of informal payments, human resources scarcity, and the overlapping private interests of pharmaceutical companies and providers.

          Conclusion

          Though changes were manifest in certain fora, providers have not necessarily embraced the notion of low caste, tribal, or Muslim women as citizens with entitlements, especially in the context of free government services for childbirth. Grassroots advocates, CBOs, and SAHAYOG assumed a supremely difficult task. Project strategy changes may have made the task somewhat less difficult, but given the population making the rights claims and the rights they were claiming, widespread changes in demands for informal payments may require a much larger and stronger coalition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail-Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Qualitative research: Observational methods in health care settings.

            C Pope, N Mays (1995)
            Clinicians used to observing individual patients, and epidemiologists trained to observe the course of disease, may be forgiven for misunderstanding the term observational method as used in qualitative research. In contrast to the clinician or epidemiologist, the qualitative researcher systematically watches people and events to find out about behaviours and interactions in natural settings. Observation, in this sense, epitomises the idea of the researcher as the research instrument. It involves "going into the field"--describing and analysing what has been seen. In health care settings this method has been insightful and illuminating, but it is not without pitfalls for the unprepared researcher.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Informal payments for health care: definitions, distinctions, and dilemmas.

              There is increasing interest in the issue of informal payments for health care in low- and middle-income countries. Emerging evidence suggests that the phenomenon is both diverse, including many variants from cash payments to in-kind contributions and from gift giving to informal charging, and widespread, reported from countries in at least three continents. However, cross-national research is hampered by the lack of consensus among researchers on the definition of informal payments, and the definitions that have been proposed are unable to incorporate all forms of the phenomenon that have been described so far. This article aims to overcome this limitation by proposing a new definition based on the concept of entitlement for services. First, the various forms of informal payment observed in practice are reviewed briefly. Then, some of the proposed definitions are discussed, pointing out that none of the distinctive characteristics implied by these definitions, including illegality, informality, and corruption, is adequate to capture all varieties of the phenomenon. Next, an alternative definition is formulated, which identifies the distinctive feature common to all forms of informal payments as something that is contributed in addition to the terms of entitlement. Then, the boundaries implied by this definition are explored and, finally, the implications for research and policy making are discussed with reference to the lessons developed countries can learn from the experiences of transitional countries.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mls2014@cumc.columbia.edu
                jasho_dg2006@yahoo.com
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                11 June 2019
                11 June 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 732
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000419368729, GRID grid.21729.3f, Program on Global Health Justice and Governance, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health (HDPFH), Mailman School of Public Health, , Columbia University, ; 60 Haven Ave, B3, New York, NY 10032 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2215 0921, GRID grid.500293.d, National Foundation for India, Core 4A (Upper Ground Floor), , India Habitat Centre, ; Lodi Road, New Delhi, 110003 India
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7616-5966
                Article
                7028
                10.1186/s12889-019-7028-2
                6560750
                31185954
                a51ae871-0a95-49c4-a8f5-07b952ce82dd
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 7 August 2018
                : 22 May 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000870, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation;
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Public health
                social accountability,collective action,corruption,global health,india,gender
                Public health
                social accountability, collective action, corruption, global health, india, gender

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content20

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors392