9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Our Response to COVID-19 as Endocrinologists and Diabetologists

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In our professional lives, we have not witnessed a healthcare crisis of this magnitude and severity. As we proof this (March 30, 2020), COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus and labeled a global pandemic by the World Health Organization, is sweeping across the globe—over 730 000 cases and 35 000 deaths, with cases reported in over 190 countries. These numbers will rise substantially in forthcoming weeks and months. We will all be in the midst of national and locally driven crisis management plans that understandably will impact our routine practice as we prioritize acute care to the most vulnerable. Over and above this, we felt it timely to highlight a few areas where our discipline-specific contribution can deliver a major impact. First, for patients treated with glucocorticoids, it will be invaluable to reiterate “sick day rules” for our known patients with primary and secondary adrenal insufficiency taking glucocorticoid replacement therapy. As it relates to COVID-19, any patient with a dry continuous cough and fever should immediately double their daily oral glucocorticoid dose and continue on this regimen until the fever has subsided. Deteriorating patients and those who experience vomiting or diarrhea should seek urgent medical care and be treated with parenteral glucocorticoids (1). More impactful will be the extension of these guidelines to the ~5% of patients in our populations taking chronic therapeutic corticosteroids by differing routes for underlying inflammatory conditions. The prevalence of adrenal insufficiency in these patients is high (~50%) irrespective of mode of delivery (2). Currently there is little evidence to guide us on when to intervene in terms of duration of prior corticosteroid exposure or on the impact of dose, either at a higher dose where supplemental steroid cover may not be necessary or a lower dose where adrenal suppression may not be as prevalent. In the interim, it seems logical, if not essential, that we identify all patients taking corticosteroids for whatever reason as high risk. We know from the published reports to date that these patients will be overrepresented in those at greatest risk of dying from COVID-19—the elderly and those with co-morbidities that include diabetes, hypertension, and chronic inflammatory disease (3,4). Moreover, those patients taking supraphysiologic doses of glucocorticoids may have increased susceptibility to COVID-19 as a result of the immunosuppressive effects of steroids, comorbidities of underlying immune disorders for which the steroids were prescribed, or immunomodulatory actions of other therapies prescribed in conjunction with glucocorticoids for the underlying disease. Reversing potential adrenal failure as a cause of mortality with parenteral glucocorticoid therapy is easy and simple to do once the issue has been recognized. The intent here is to ensure that no patient with a history of prior exposure to chronic glucocorticoid therapy (>3 months) by whatever route should die without consideration for parenteral glucocorticoid therapy. As a community, we will be key to ensuring recognition, management, and implementation of these important measures. In this context, it will be important to communicate the reason underpinning glucocorticoid use. Based on prior experience in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and those affected with SARS and MERS (5), where glucocorticoid therapy was without benefit or associated with higher rates of invasive ventilation and mortality, the World Health Organization guidance is not to prescribe glucocorticoids (6). Physiological stress doses of hydrocortisone (50–100 mg intravenously t.i.d) not pharmacological doses of other corticosteroids should be given. Second, the impact on patients with pituitary or other neuroendocrine disease also needs to be considered. As for patients with primary adrenal insufficiency, many of these patients have hypopituitarism including secondary adrenal insufficiency, requiring stress dose glucocorticoid supplementation as previously noted. Moreover, these patients may also have diabetes insipidus, further compounding fluid and electrolyte disorders and requiring careful monitoring and judicious water and electrolyte replacement to prevent hyponatremia or hypernatremia. This is particularly important in the context of increased insensible fluid loss associated with fever and tachypnea, combined with impaired ability for fluid intake with altered level of consciousness (7). Third, for patients with diabetes mellitus, whereas the risk of contracting a viral illness is no greater than those without diabetes mellitus, severity of disease from viral infections is notably greater. Recent published reports from the Wuhan province in China (3,4) reveal that those with diabetes mellitus and hypertension were overrepresented among the most severely ill patients with COVID-19 and those succumbing to the disease. Whether this susceptibility to illness severity is especially greater in the case of COVID-19 or simply a reflection of the greater risk posed by diabetes remains uncertain at this point. Current guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for prevention of COVID-19 for those with diabetes is no different than the general population, but the recognition that diabetes poses a greater risk for severity of illness should prompt health-care providers to be more vigilant in the assessment of such patients who present with concerning symptoms (ie, shortness of breath, fever) (8). Finally, as clinician scientists, we realize that research and innovation will ultimately provide solutions to this crisis, whether through enhanced diagnostics, innovative therapies, or future vaccines. A potentially exciting endocrine-connected observation is the elucidation of the mechanism of entry of SARS-CoV-2 into cells. Here, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is now established as the SARS-CoV receptor (9) but with conflicting data as to its translational relevance. It has been suggested that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers might increase susceptibility and severity to COVID-19 through upregulation of ACE2 and thereby possibly explain the overrepresentation of hypertensive patients in patients dying from COVID-19 (10). Upregulation of ACE2 might also explain the poor outcome in smokers versus nonsmokers, but it is important to stress that these are preliminary reports and should not result in changing prescribed medications at this stage (11). APN01 is a recombinant human ACE2 developed by APEIRON for the treatment of acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and pulmonary arterial hypertension; by slowing viral entry into cells and viral spread, it may be beneficial, and clinical trials are underway (12). Conversely, angiotensin II is known to stimulate alveolar epithelial cell apoptosis, and inhibition of this with angiotensin receptor 1 blockers such as losartan might reduce mortality from acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19 infection (13). Perhaps justifying greater excitement is the downstream transmembrane protease serine 2 required for SARS-CoV-2 viral spike protein priming and onward transmission (14). Camostat mesylate, a transmembrane protease serine 2 inhibitor, has been approved in Japan for the treatment of pancreatic inflammation and when tested on SARS-CoV-2 isolated from a patient prevented the entry of the virus into lung cells. Endocrine-related targets are at the forefront of discovery science as we collectively tackle this pandemic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China

          Abstract Background Since December 2019, when coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) emerged in Wuhan city and rapidly spread throughout China, data have been needed on the clinical characteristics of the affected patients. Methods We extracted data regarding 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 from 552 hospitals in 30 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in mainland China through January 29, 2020. The primary composite end point was admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), the use of mechanical ventilation, or death. Results The median age of the patients was 47 years; 41.9% of the patients were female. The primary composite end point occurred in 67 patients (6.1%), including 5.0% who were admitted to the ICU, 2.3% who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation, and 1.4% who died. Only 1.9% of the patients had a history of direct contact with wildlife. Among nonresidents of Wuhan, 72.3% had contact with residents of Wuhan, including 31.3% who had visited the city. The most common symptoms were fever (43.8% on admission and 88.7% during hospitalization) and cough (67.8%). Diarrhea was uncommon (3.8%). The median incubation period was 4 days (interquartile range, 2 to 7). On admission, ground-glass opacity was the most common radiologic finding on chest computed tomography (CT) (56.4%). No radiographic or CT abnormality was found in 157 of 877 patients (17.9%) with nonsevere disease and in 5 of 173 patients (2.9%) with severe disease. Lymphocytopenia was present in 83.2% of the patients on admission. Conclusions During the first 2 months of the current outbreak, Covid-19 spread rapidly throughout China and caused varying degrees of illness. Patients often presented without fever, and many did not have abnormal radiologic findings. (Funded by the National Health Commission of China and others.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor

            Summary The recent emergence of the novel, pathogenic SARS-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in China and its rapid national and international spread pose a global health emergency. Cell entry of coronaviruses depends on binding of the viral spike (S) proteins to cellular receptors and on S protein priming by host cell proteases. Unravelling which cellular factors are used by SARS-CoV-2 for entry might provide insights into viral transmission and reveal therapeutic targets. Here, we demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 uses the SARS-CoV receptor ACE2 for entry and the serine protease TMPRSS2 for S protein priming. A TMPRSS2 inhibitor approved for clinical use blocked entry and might constitute a treatment option. Finally, we show that the sera from convalescent SARS patients cross-neutralized SARS-2-S-driven entry. Our results reveal important commonalities between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV infection and identify a potential target for antiviral intervention.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study

              Summary Background An ongoing outbreak of pneumonia associated with the severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) started in December, 2019, in Wuhan, China. Information about critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection is scarce. We aimed to describe the clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Methods In this single-centered, retrospective, observational study, we enrolled 52 critically ill adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Wuhan Jin Yin-tan hospital (Wuhan, China) between late December, 2019, and Jan 26, 2020. Demographic data, symptoms, laboratory values, comorbidities, treatments, and clinical outcomes were all collected. Data were compared between survivors and non-survivors. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, as of Feb 9, 2020. Secondary outcomes included incidence of SARS-CoV-2-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and the proportion of patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Findings Of 710 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, 52 critically ill adult patients were included. The mean age of the 52 patients was 59·7 (SD 13·3) years, 35 (67%) were men, 21 (40%) had chronic illness, 51 (98%) had fever. 32 (61·5%) patients had died at 28 days, and the median duration from admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) to death was 7 (IQR 3–11) days for non-survivors. Compared with survivors, non-survivors were older (64·6 years [11·2] vs 51·9 years [12·9]), more likely to develop ARDS (26 [81%] patients vs 9 [45%] patients), and more likely to receive mechanical ventilation (30 [94%] patients vs 7 [35%] patients), either invasively or non-invasively. Most patients had organ function damage, including 35 (67%) with ARDS, 15 (29%) with acute kidney injury, 12 (23%) with cardiac injury, 15 (29%) with liver dysfunction, and one (2%) with pneumothorax. 37 (71%) patients required mechanical ventilation. Hospital-acquired infection occurred in seven (13·5%) patients. Interpretation The mortality of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is considerable. The survival time of the non-survivors is likely to be within 1–2 weeks after ICU admission. Older patients (>65 years) with comorbidities and ARDS are at increased risk of death. The severity of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia poses great strain on critical care resources in hospitals, especially if they are not adequately staffed or resourced. Funding None.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Endocrinol Metab
                J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab
                jcem
                The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0021-972X
                1945-7197
                May 2020
                31 March 2020
                31 March 2020
                : 105
                : 5
                : dgaa148
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts
                [2 ] Department of Medicine, University of Chicago , Chicago, Illinois
                [3 ] Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds , Leeds, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence and Reprint Requests: Paul M. Stewart, Editor-in-Chief, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9NL, UK. E-mail: p.m.stewart@ 123456leeds.ac.uk .
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8237-0704
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5013-6075
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-9640
                Article
                dgaa148
                10.1210/clinem/dgaa148
                7108679
                32232480
                a51c7d1c-0ba8-4c98-92f7-fc02668545e3
                © Endocrine Society 2020.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 19 March 2020
                : 21 March 2020
                : 31 March 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 3
                Categories
                Editorial
                AcademicSubjects/MED00250

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article