1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Other Second-Line Antidiabetics in Early Pregnancy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is periconceptional use of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists or other noninsulin second-line antidiabetic medications (ADMs) associated with increased risk of major congenital malformations?

          Findings

          This multinational population-based cohort study of more than 50 000 pregnant women with type 2 diabetes and their infants did not find greater risk of malformations after periconceptional use of sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, or sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors compared with insulin.

          Meaning

          Use of GLP-1 receptor agonists and other noninsulin second-line ADMs has increased in pregnancy and in this first large study on their teratogenic risk in humans, results provide initial reassurance of their safety.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines the association of periconceptional use of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists or other noninsulin second-line antidiabetic medications with increased risk of major congenital malformations.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Increasing use of second-line noninsulin antidiabetic medication (ADM) in pregnant individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) may result in fetal exposure, but their teratogenic risk is unknown.

          Objective

          To evaluate periconceptional use of second-line noninsulin ADMs and whether it is associated with increased risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) in the infant.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This observational population-based cohort study used data from 4 Nordic countries (2009-2020), the US MarketScan Database (2012-2021), and the Israeli Maccabi Health Services database (2009-2020). Pregnant women with T2D were identified and their live-born infants were followed until up to 1 year after birth.

          Exposure

          Periconceptional exposure was defined as 1 or more prescription fill of sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, or insulin (active comparator) from 90 days before pregnancy to end of first trimester.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs for MCMs were estimated using log-binomial regression models, adjusting for key confounders in each cohort and meta-analyzed.

          Results

          Periconceptional exposure to second-line noninsulin ADMs differed between countries (32, 295, and 73 per 100 000 pregnancies in the Nordics, US, and Israel, respectively), and increased over the study period, especially in the US. The standardized prevalence of MCMs was 3.7% in all infants (n = 3 514 865), 5.3% in the infants born to women with T2D (n = 51 826), and among infants exposed to sulfonylureas was 9.7% (n = 1362); DPP-4 inhibitors, 6.1% (n = 687); GLP-1 receptor agonists, 8.3% (n = 938); SGLT2 inhibitors, 7.0% (n = 335); and insulin, 7.8% (n = 5078). Compared with insulin, adjusted RRs for MCMs were 1.18 (95% CI, 0.94-1.48), 0.83 (95% CI, 0.64-1.06), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.72-1.26), and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.65-1.46) for infants exposed to sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and SGLT2 inhibitors, respectively.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Use of second-line noninsulin ADMs is rapidly increasing for treatment of T2D and other indications, resulting in an increasing number of exposed pregnancies. Although some estimates were imprecise, results did not indicate a large increased risk of MCMs above the risk conferred by maternal T2D requiring second-line treatment. Although reassuring, confirmation from other studies is needed, and continuous monitoring will provide more precise estimates as data accumulate.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045

          Since the year 2000, IDF has been measuring the prevalence of diabetes nationally, regionally and globally.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021

            (2020)
            The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019

              Unintended pregnancy and abortion estimates document trends in sexual and reproductive health and autonomy. These estimates inform and motivate investment in global health programmes and policies. Variability in the availability and reliability of data poses challenges for measuring and monitoring trends in unintended pregnancy and abortion. We developed a new statistical model that jointly estimated unintended pregnancy and abortion that aimed to better inform efforts towards global equity in sexual and reproductive health and rights.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Intern Med
                JAMA Intern Med
                JAMA Internal Medicine
                American Medical Association
                2168-6106
                2168-6114
                11 December 2023
                February 2024
                11 December 2023
                : 184
                : 2
                : 144-152
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
                [3 ]Maccabitech Institute for Research and Innovation, Maccabi Healthcare Services
                [4 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
                [5 ]Department of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
                [6 ]Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
                [7 ]Department of Knowledge Brokers Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
                [8 ]Region Stockholm, Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Stockholm, Sweden
                [9 ]Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
                [10 ]Research Centre for Child Psychiatry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
                [11 ]Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                [12 ]Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
                [13 ]School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [14 ]Centre of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
                [15 ]Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: October 11, 2023.
                Published Online: December 11, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.6663
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2023 Cesta CE et al. JAMA Internal Medicine.
                Corresponding Author: Carolyn E. Cesta, PhD, Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Maria Aspmans gata 30A, 17164 Solna, Sweden ( carolyn.cesta@ 123456ki.se ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Cesta had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Cesta, Bateman, Chodick, Cohen, Furu, Huybrechts, Kjerpeseth, Leinonen, Pazzagli, Zoega, Seely, Patorno, Hernández-Díaz.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Cesta, Rotem, Bateman, Cohen, Furu, Gissler, Huybrechts, Leinonen, Zoega, Hernández-Díaz.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Cesta.
                Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Cesta, Rotem.
                Obtained funding: Cesta, Furu, Huybrechts, Zoega, Hernández-Díaz.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Cesta, Rotem, Cohen, Furu, Gissler, Huybrechts, Kjerpeseth, Pazzagli.
                Supervision: Gissler, Patorno, Hernández-Díaz.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Cesta reported grants from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 844728 during the conduct of the study; and participation in research projects funded by pharmaceutical companies, all regulator-mandated phase 4 studies, with all funds paid to KI (no personal fees) and no relation to work reported in this article. Dr Bateman reported grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) during the conduct of the study. Dr Cohen reported grants from The Research Council of Norway project #301977 and grants from ADHD Research Network, Oslo University Hospital project #51379 outside the submitted work. Dr Furu reported working on a post-authorisation safety study (PASS required by EMA) of an antidiabetic drug with funding to NIPH from Novo Nordisk (no personal fees) during the conduct of the study. Dr Huybrechts reported grants from NICHD R01 HD097778 during the conduct of the study; grants to institution from Takeda and UCB as an investigator on unrelated work outside the submitted work. Dr Kjerpeseth reported grants from the Research Council of Norway (project no. 273366 with PI Dr Kari Furu, paid to the institution to fund expenses for the InPreSS project, including salary) during the conduct of the study. Dr Leinonen reported grants from Innovative Medicines Initiative Building an ecosystem for better monitoring and communicating the safety of medicines’ use in pregnancy and breastfeeding: validated and regulatory endorsed workflows for fast, optimized evidence generation, IMI ConcePTION, grant agreement number 821520 outside the submitted work. Dr Pazzagli reported a grant from FORTE Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (project No. 2021-01080). Dr Patorno reported grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Development (NICHD) R01 HD097778 during the conduct of the study; grants from Boehringer Ingelheim to the Brigham and Women’s Hospital, grants from Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute DB-2020C2-20326, and grants from Food and Drug Administration 5U01FD007213 outside the submitted work. Dr Hernández-Díaz reported grants from Takeda to her institution, personal fees from Johnson & Johnson for methods consulting, personal fees from Moderna for methods consulting, and personal fees from UCB for methods consulting outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: For this project, CEC was supported by funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 844728. This work was supported by grant R01 HD097778 from the National Institute of Child Health and Development (NICHD). The study was partly supported by the NordForsk Nordic Program on Health and Welfare (Nordic Pregnancy Drug Safety Studies, project No. 83539), by the Research Council of Norway (International Pregnancy Drug Safety Studies, project No. 273366), and by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme (project No. 262700).
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding institutions had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Meeting Presentation: Preliminary results from this paper were presented at the the 37th International Conference Meeting of the Pharmacoepidemiology & Therapeutic Risk Management; August 26-28, 2022; Copenhagen, Denmark; and at the 58th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes; September 19-23, 2022; Stockholm, Sweeden.
                Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2.
                Additional Contributions: We thank Ó. Halfdanarson, PhD; P. Karlsson, MSc; and V. Hjellvik, PhD; for preparation of the pooled Nordic data, and E. Rojco,MSc; and R. Logan, PhD; for assistance with the analysis of the MarketScan data. None were compensated.
                Article
                ioi230083
                10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.6663
                10714281
                38079178
                a686e1af-c197-4912-a369-3d62f99a4b9a
                Copyright 2023 Cesta CE et al. JAMA Internal Medicine.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 30 June 2023
                : 11 October 2023
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online First

                Comments

                Comment on this article