18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations.

      Brain
      Adult, Blood Flow Velocity, physiology, Brain, blood supply, radionuclide imaging, Brain Mapping, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Data Display, Distance Perception, Eye Movements, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Space Perception, Tomography, Emission-Computed

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We used PET to determine which brain regions are implicated when normal volunteers bisect horizontal lines and point to dots in near (peripersonal) or far (extrapersonal) space. Studies of line bisection in patients with right hemisphere lesions have shown that bisection performance can be severely impaired in either near or far space while remaining within normal limits in the other spatial domain. Likewise, clinical dissociations between pointing to objects in near and far space have been reported. The normal functional anatomy of these dissociations has not been demonstrated convincingly. Regional cerebral blood flow measurements using PET were carried out in 12 healthy right-handed male volunteers who bisected lines or pointed to dots in near or far space, using a laser pen. Subjects performing either task in near space showed neural activity in the left dorsal occipital cortex, left intraparietal cortex, left ventral premotor cortex and left thalamus. In far space, subjects performing either task showed activation of the ventral occipital cortex bilaterally and the right medial temporal cortex. These data provide physiological support for the clinically observed dissociations demonstrating that attending to and acting in near space differentially employs dorsal visuomotor processing areas, whereas attending to and acting in far space differentially draws on ventral visuoperceptual processing areas, even when the motor components of the tasks are identical when performed in the two spaces.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article