13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Redefining the pharmacology and pharmacy subject category in the journal citation reports using medical subject headings (MeSH)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS.

          D. Price (1965)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research

            P O Seglen (1997)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: a review.

              Cluster analysis is a collection of relatively simple descriptive statistical techniques with potential value in health psychology, addressing both theoretical and practical problems. There are many methods of cluster analysis from which to choose, with no clear guidelines to aid researchers. In the absence of guidelines it is likely that methods already reported by published researchers will be adopted, and so clear reporting of statistical methodology, while always important, is particularly crucial with cluster analysis. The aim of this review is to describe and evaluate the reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology publications. Electronic searches of 18 health psychology journals identified 59 articles using cluster analysis published between 1984 and 2002. Articles were submitted to systematic evaluation against published criteria for the reporting of cluster analysis. Just 27% of the papers reviewed met all five criteria, although 61% met at least four. Details of the similarity measure and the computer program used were most frequently omitted. Furthermore, while researchers usually reported the procedures employed to determine the number of clusters and to validate the clusters, these procedures were often lacking in rigour, and were reported in insufficient detail for replication. The reporting of cluster analysis was found to be generally unsatisfactory, with many studies failing to provide enough information to allow replication or the evaluation of the quality of the research. Clear guidelines for conducting and reporting cluster analyses in health psychology are needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
                Int J Clin Pharm
                Springer Nature
                2210-7703
                2210-7711
                October 2017
                August 23 2017
                October 2017
                : 39
                : 5
                : 989-997
                Article
                10.1007/s11096-017-0527-2
                28836131
                a933f9a0-0539-48e2-8d99-15a88601930a
                © 2017

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article