1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Characteristics and outcomes of patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm treated with frontline HCVAD

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          • Given high relapse and CNS involvement of BPDCN, combination chemotherapy and prophylactic CNS-directed therapy are urgently needed.

          • HCVAD chemotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of BPDCN, even in the modern era of CD123-targeted therapy.

          Visual Abstract

          Abstract

          Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a clinically aggressive blood cancer, often involving the skin, bone marrow, lymph nodes, and central nervous system (CNS) in 20% to 30% of patients. Despite significant progress in CD123- and BCL-2–targeted therapy, most patients are not cured without hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), and CNS relapses occur quite frequently. Combination approaches with targeted and chemotherapy agents plus incorporation of prophylactic CNS-directed therapy are urgently needed. In this setting, we sought to analyze outcomes using the cytotoxic chemotherapy backbone regimen hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (HCVAD). We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with BPDCN (n = 100), evaluating complete remission (CR) and median overall survival (OS) among 3 groups: those who received frontline HCVAD-based therapy (n = 35), SL-401 (n = 37), or other regimens (n = 28). HCVAD-based regimens yielded higher CR (80% vs 59% vs 43%; P = .01). There was no significant difference in OS (28.3 vs 13.7 vs 22.8 months; P = .41) or remission duration probability among treatment groups (38.6 vs not reached vs 10.2 months; P = .24). HSCT was performed in 51% vs 49% vs 38%, respectively ( P = .455). These results suggest a continued important role for HCVAD-based chemotherapy in BPDCN, even in the modern targeted-therapy era, with high CR rates in the frontline setting. Further studies must establish the clinical activity, feasibility, and safety of doublet/triplet combinations of targeted therapies plus cytotoxic agents and the addition of CNS prophylaxis, with the ultimate goal of durable long-term remission for patients with BPDCN.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical experience with the BCL2-inhibitor venetoclax in combination therapy for relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia and related myeloid malignancies.

          Venetoclax (VEN), a selective BCL2 inhibitor, has single-agent activity in relapsed and refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and efficacy in lower intensity combinations for treatment-naïve elderly AML patients. VEN treatment combinations in R/R AML have not been previously reported.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Results of treatment with hyper-CVAD, a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia.

            To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of Hyper-CVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone), a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). Adults with newly diagnosed ALL referred since 1992 were entered onto the study; treatment was initiated in 204 patients between 1992 and January 1998. No exclusions were made because of older age, poor performance status, organ dysfunction, or active infection. Median age was 39.5 years; 37% were at least 50 years old. Mature B-cell disease (Burkitt type) was present in 9%, T-cell disease in 17%. Leukocytosis of more than 30 x 10(9)/L was found in 26%, Philadelphia chromosome-positive disease in 16% (20% of patients with assessable metaphases), CNS leukemia at the time of diagnosis in 7%, and a mediastinal mass in 7%. Treatment consisted of four cycles of Hyper-CVAD alternating with four cycles of high-dose methotrexate (MTX) and cytarabine therapy, together with intrathecal CNS prophylaxis and supportive care with antibiotic prophylaxis and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy. Maintenance in patients with nonmature B-cell ALL included 2 years of treatment with mercaptopurine, MTX, vincristine, and prednisone (POMP). Overall, 185 patients (91%) achieved complete remission (CR) and 12 (6%) died during induction therapy. Estimated 5-year survival and 5-year CR rates were 39% and 38%, respectively. The incidence of CNS relapse was low (4%). Compared with 222 patients treated with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) regimens, our patients had a better CR rate (91% v 75%, P <.01) and CR rate after one course (74% v 55%, P <.01) and better survival (P <.01), and a smaller percentage had more than 5% day 14 blasts (34% v 48%, P =.01). Previous prognostic models remained predictive for outcome with Hyper-CVAD therapy. Hyper-CVAD therapy is superior to our previous regimens and should be compared with established regimens in adult ALL.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Tagraxofusp in Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic-Cell Neoplasm

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Blood Adv
                Blood Adv
                bloodoa
                Blood Advances
                Blood Advances
                American Society of Hematology (Washington, DC )
                2473-9529
                2473-9537
                24 May 2022
                17 May 2022
                : 6
                : 10
                : 3027-3035
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX;
                [2 ]Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX;
                [3 ]Department of Hematopathology, and
                [4 ]Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
                Author notes

                Requests for data sharing may be submitted to Naveen Pemmaraju ( npemmaraju@ 123456mdanderson.org ).

                Correspondence: Naveen Pemmaraju, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: npemmaraju@ 123456mdanderson.org .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1670-6513
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9123-1781
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9140-0610
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2621-3584
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7103-373X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9003-0390
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-2212
                Article
                2022/ADV2021006645
                10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006645
                9131912
                35061885
                a96e524e-cac6-44e6-93bf-909590edfbdf
                © 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) , permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.
                History
                : 17 November 2021
                : 09 January 2022
                : 21 January 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Categories
                25
                Myeloid Neoplasia

                Comments

                Comment on this article