1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Case report: Molecular analysis of a 47,XY,+21/46,XX chimera using SNP microarray and review of literature

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Chimerism is a very rare genetic finding in human. Most reported cases have a chi 46,XX/46,XY karyotype. Only three non-twin cases carrying both trisomy 21 and a normal karyotype have been reported, including two cases with a chi 47,XY,+21/46,XX karyotype and a case with a chi 47,XX,+21/46,XY karyotype. Herein we describe an additional case with a chi 47,XY,+21/46,XX karyotype. For the case, a physical examination at the age of 1 year revealed ambiguous genitalia with no features of Down syndrome or other malformations. Growth and developmental milestones were within normal ranges. We performed short tandem repeat (STR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray analyses to attempt to identify the mechanism underlying the chimerism in this patient and the origin of the extra chromosome 21. Cytogenetic analyses of the patient’s peripheral blood revealed approximately 17% of a 47,XY,+21 lineage by G-banding karyotype analysis, 13%–17% by FISH analyses of uncultured peripheral blood, and 10%–15% by SNP microarray analysis. Four years later, the percentage of trisomy 21 cells had decreased to approximately 6%. SNP microarray and STR analyses revealed a single maternal and double paternal genetic contribution to the patient for the majority of the markers, including the chromosome 21 markers. The extra chromosome 21 was paternally derived and meiosis I nondisjunction likely occurred during spermatogenesis. The mechanisms underlying chimera in our case was likely fertilization two spermatozoa, one with an ovum and the other with the second polar body.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism and uniparental disomy identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis.

          Mosaic aneuploidy and uniparental disomy (UPD) arise from mitotic or meiotic events. There are differences between these mechanisms in terms of (i) impact on embryonic development; (ii) co-occurrence of mosaic trisomy and UPD and (iii) potential recurrence risks. We used a genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array to study patients with chromosome aneuploidy mosaicism, UPD and one individual with XX/XY chimerism to gain insight into the developmental mechanism and timing of these events. Sixteen cases of mosaic aneuploidy originated mitotically, and these included four rare trisomies and all of the monosomies, consistent with the influence of selective factors. Five trisomies arose meiotically, and three of the five had UPD in the disomic cells, confirming increased risk for UPD in the case of meiotic non-disjunction. Evidence for the meiotic origin of aneuploidy and UPD was seen in the patterns of recombination visible during analysis with 1-3 crossovers per chromosome. The mechanisms of formation of the UPD included trisomy rescue, with and without concomitant trisomy, monosomy rescue, and mitotic formation of a mosaic segmental UPD. UPD was also identified in an XX/XY chimeric individual, with one cell line having complete maternal UPD consistent with a parthenogenetic origin. Utilization of SNP arrays allows simultaneous evaluation of genomic alterations and insights into aneuploidy and UPD mechanisms. Differentiation of mitotic and meiotic origins for aneuploidy and UPD supports existence of selective factors against full trisomy of some chromosomes in the early embryo and provides data for estimation of recurrence and disease mechanisms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Chimera and other fertilization errors.

            The finding of a mixture of 46,XX and 46,XY cells in an individual has been rarely reported in literature. It usually results in individuals with ambiguous genitalia. Approximately 10% of true human hermaphrodites show this type of karyotype. However, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. It may be the result of mosaicism or chimerism. By definition, a chimera is produced by the fusion of two different zygotes in a single embryo, while a mosaic contains genetically different cells issued from a single zygote. Several mechanisms are involved in the production of chimera. Stricto sensu, chimerism occurs from the post-zygotic fusion of two distinct embryos leading to a tetragametic chimera. In addition, there are other entities, which are also referred to as chimera: parthenogenetic chimera and chimera resulting from fertilization of the second polar body. Furthermore, a particular type of chimera called 'androgenetic chimera' recently described in fetuses with placental mesenchymal dysplasia and in rare patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome is discussed. Strategies to study mechanisms leading to the production of chimera and mosaics are also proposed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Embryogenesis of chimeras, twins and anterior midline asymmetries.

              Human spontaneous chimerism, with one body built from cells of both twins of a dizygotic (DZ) pair, is supposed to be extremely rare, arising from the exchange of blood cells through placental anastomoses. Mosaicism is supposed to be far more common, arising from single zygotes by embryonic mutation. Because typical diagnosis of mosaicism can neither identify nor exclude chimerism, 'mosaicism' may often be chimerism undiscovered. Evidence shows chimerism arises primarily from DZ embryo fusion and is not rare, although it has negligible probability under the hypothesis of independent double ovulation and independent embryogenesis. If, instead, DZ twin embryos begin development as a single cell mass, chimerism is likely. This would be consistent with observations that DZ twins develop as differently from singletons as monozygotic twins do with regard to embryogenic establishment of asymmetries of midline neural-crest-driven structures of brain, face and heart. Chimerism is a significant component of human embryonic development that deserves closer attention as a mechanism of developmental variation. The 'common knowledge' understanding of twinning mechanisms is at best inadequate. The importance of the difference lies in what we can learn from chimerism about human embryogenesis and the cellular origins of structures and functions basic to the business of becoming human.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Genet
                Front Genet
                Front. Genet.
                Frontiers in Genetics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-8021
                11 November 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 802362
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University , Songkhla, Thailand
                [2] 2 Genomic Medicine Center, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University , Songkhla, Thailand
                [3] 3 Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University , Songkhla, Thailand
                [4] 4 Program in Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University , Bangkok, Thailand
                [5] 5 Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University , Samut Prakan, Thailand
                [6] 6 Integrative Computational Bioscience Center (ICBS), Mahidol University , Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jordi Pérez-Tur, Institute of Biomedicine of Valencia (CSIC), Spain

                Reviewed by: Ricardo Palma-Dias, Royal Women’s Hospital, Australia

                Ashutosh Halder, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India

                *Correspondence: Pornprot Limprasert, lpornpro@ 123456yahoo.com , pornprot.l@ 123456psu.ac.th

                This article was submitted to Genetics of Common and Rare Diseases, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics

                Article
                802362
                10.3389/fgene.2022.802362
                9709885
                36468027
                adfaf1e1-5fed-4499-afe0-75820319910f
                Copyright © 2022 Charalsawadi, Jaruratanasirikul, Hnoonual, Chantarapong, Sangmanee, Trongnit, Jinawath and Limprasert.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 26 October 2021
                : 25 October 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University , doi 10.13039/501100010804;
                Categories
                Genetics
                Case Report

                Genetics
                chimerism,mosaicism,down syndrome,mechanism,snp microarray
                Genetics
                chimerism, mosaicism, down syndrome, mechanism, snp microarray

                Comments

                Comment on this article