21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perception survey of crisis and emergency risk communication in an acute hospital in the management of COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Emergency risk communication is a critical component in emergency planning and response. It has been recognised as significant for planning for and responding to public health emergencies. While there is a growing body of guidelines and frameworks on emergency risk communication, it remains a relatively new field. There has also been limited attention on how emergency risk communication is being performed in public health organisations, such as acute hospitals, and what the associated challenges are. This article seeks to examine the perception of crisis and emergency risk communication in an acute hospital in response to COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore and to identify its associated enablers and barriers.

          Methods

          A 13-item Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) Survey, based on the US Centers for Disease and Control (CDC) CERC framework, was developed and administered to hospital staff during February 24–28, 2020. The survey also included an open-ended question to solicit feedback on areas of CERC in need of improvement. Chi-square test was used for analysis of survey data. Thematic analysis was performed on qualitative feedback.

          Results

          Of the 1154 participants who responded to the survey, most (94.1%) reported that regular hospital updates on COVID-19 were understandable and actionable. Many (92.5%) stated that accurate, concise and timely information helped to keep them safe. A majority (92.3%) of them were clear about the hospital’s response to the COVID-19 situation, and 79.4% of the respondents reported that the hospital had been able to understand their challenges and address their concerns. Sociodemographic characteristics, such as occupation, age, marital status, work experience, gender, and staff’s primary work location influenced the responses to hospital CERC. Local leaders within the hospital would need support to better communicate and translate hospital updates in response to COVID-19 to actionable plans for their staff. Better communication in executing resource utilization plans, expressing more empathy and care for their staff, and enhancing communication channels, such as through the use of secure text messaging rather than emails would be important.

          Conclusion

          CERC is relevant and important in the hospital setting to managing COVID-19 and should be considered concurrently with hospital emergency response domains.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-10047-2.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Thematic analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Healthcare Workers Emotions, Perceived Stressors and Coping Strategies During a MERS-CoV Outbreak

            Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk of contracting Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) during an epidemic. We explored the emotions, perceived stressors, and coping strategies of healthcare workers who worked during a MERS-CoV outbreak in our hospital.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Risk perception and impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on work and personal lives of healthcare workers in Singapore: what can we learn?

              Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at the frontline during the battle against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Understanding their fears and anxieties may hold lessons for handling future outbreaks, including acts of bioterrorism. We measured risk perception and impact on personal and work life of 15,025 HCWs from 9 major healthcare institutions during the SARS epidemic in Singapore using a self-administered questionnaire and Impact of Events Scale and analyzed the results with bivariate and multivariate statistics. From 10,511 valid questionnaires (70% response), we found that although the majority (76%) perceived a great personal risk of falling ill with SARS, they (69.5%) also accepted the risk as part of their job. Clinical staff (doctors and nurses), staff in daily contact with SARS patients, and staff from SARS-affected institutions expressed significantly higher levels of anxiety. More than half reported increased work stress (56%) and work load (53%). Many experienced social stigmatization (49%) and ostracism by family members (31%), but most (77%) felt appreciated by society. Most felt that the personal protective measures implemented were effective (96%) and that the institutional policies and protocols were clear (93%) and timely (90%). During epidemics, healthcare institutions have a duty to protect HCWs and help them cope with their personal fears and the very stressful work situation. Singapore's experience shows that simple protective measures based on sound epidemiological principles, when implemented in a timely manner, go a long way to reassure HCWs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ow.yong.lai.meng@sgh.com.sg
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                17 December 2020
                17 December 2020
                2020
                : 20
                : 1919
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.163555.1, ISNI 0000 0000 9486 5048, Medical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, ; Singapore, 169608 Singapore
                [2 ]GRID grid.163555.1, ISNI 0000 0000 9486 5048, Health Services Research Unit, Singapore General Hospital, ; Singapore, 169608 Singapore
                [3 ]GRID grid.163555.1, ISNI 0000 0000 9486 5048, Communications, Singapore General Hospital, ; Singapore, 169608 Singapore
                [4 ]GRID grid.163555.1, ISNI 0000 0000 9486 5048, Medical Board, Singapore General Hospital, ; Singapore, 169608 Singapore
                [5 ]GRID grid.163555.1, ISNI 0000 0000 9486 5048, Chief Executive Office, Singapore General Hospital, ; Singapore, 169608 Singapore
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4035-5848
                Article
                10047
                10.1186/s12889-020-10047-2
                7745758
                b271aa5f-8a29-44de-bbd8-c1ab2b78268d
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 16 April 2020
                : 10 December 2020
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Public health
                emergency risk communication,risk communication,covid-19,public health crises
                Public health
                emergency risk communication, risk communication, covid-19, public health crises

                Comments

                Comment on this article