14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Polyclonal in vitro proliferative responses from nonimmune donors to Plasmodium falciparum malaria antigens require UCHL1+ (memory) T cells.

      European Journal of Immunology
      Adult, Ammonium Chloride, pharmacology, Animals, Antigens, Protozoan, immunology, Cell Separation, Cells, Cultured, Collodion, Cross Reactions, Epitopes, Humans, Immunologic Memory, In Vitro Techniques, Lymphocyte Activation, drug effects, Plasmodium falciparum, T-Lymphocytes

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The in vitro polyclonal proliferative responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to whole blood stage parasites or fractionated antigens from the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum were studied. Cells from healthy laboratory donors who had never been exposed to malaria antigens in vivo consistently proliferated to P. falciparum antigens, as did cord blood mononuclear cells. This response was only observed in sheep rosette-positive cells in the presence of adherent cells and was inhibited by NH4Cl, indicating a requirement for antigen processing. The proliferative response was strongest at day 6 and was dependent on the presence of cells expressing high levels of CD45 180-kD isomer (UCHL1 monoclonal antibody), a marker for activated or memory cells, but not for CD45R (SN130 monoclonal antibody) a marker for naive or unprimed T cells. This suggests a similarity to the recall response to tuberculin antigen. These results suggest that the proliferative response to malaria antigens observed previously and described as a nonspecific mitogenic response may be a cross-reactive response to epitopes shared between P. falciparum and other common immunogens. This would explain the establishment of T cell clones to malaria antigens from such donors, but might suggest that the epitopes to which such clones are specific may be of questionable protective or diagnostic use.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article