8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Practitioners’ ability to remotely develop understanding for personalised care and support planning: a thematic analysis of multiple data sources from the feasibility phase of the Dementia Personalised Care Team (D-PACT) intervention

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Practitioner understanding of patients’ preferences, wishes and needs is essential for personalised health care i.e., focusing on ‘what matters’ to people based on their individual life situation. To develop such an understanding, dementia practitioners need to use communication practices that help people share their experiences, preferences, and priorities. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, dementia support is likely to continue to be delivered both remotely and in-person. This study analysed multiple sources of qualitative data to examine the views of practitioners, people living with dementia and carers, and researchers on how an understanding of what matters to people living with dementia can be developed remotely via telephone and video call. Access to environmental stimuli, the remote use of visual tools, peoples’ tendency to downplay or omit details about their troubles and carers’ ability to disclose privately were interpreted, through thematic analysis, to be factors affecting how practitioners sought to develop understanding remotely. Cumulatively, findings show that while remote support created unique challenges to practitioners’ ability to develop understanding for personalised care, practitioners developed adaptive strategies to overcome some of these challenges. Further research should examine how, when and for whom these adapted practices for remote personalised care work, informing the development of evidence-based guidance and training on how practitioners can remotely develop the understanding required for personalised care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour

          Semistructured in-depth interviews are commonly used in qualitative research and are the most frequent qualitative data source in health services research. This method typically consists of a dialogue between researcher and participant, guided by a flexible interview protocol and supplemented by follow-up questions, probes and comments. The method allows the researcher to collect open-ended data, to explore participant thoughts, feelings and beliefs about a particular topic and to delve deeply into personal and sometimes sensitive issues. The purpose of this article was to identify and describe the essential skills to designing and conducting semistructured interviews in family medicine and primary care research settings. We reviewed the literature on semistructured interviewing to identify key skills and components for using this method in family medicine and primary care research settings. Overall, semistructured interviewing requires both a relational focus and practice in the skills of facilitation. Skills include: (1) determining the purpose and scope of the study; (2) identifying participants; (3) considering ethical issues; (4) planning logistical aspects; (5) developing the interview guide; (6) establishing trust and rapport; (7) conducting the interview; (8) memoing and reflection; (9) analysing the data; (10) demonstrating the trustworthiness of the research; and (11) presenting findings in a paper or report. Semistructured interviews provide an effective and feasible research method for family physicians to conduct in primary care research settings. Researchers using semistructured interviews for data collection should take on a relational focus and consider the skills of interviewing to ensure quality. Semistructured interviewing can be a powerful tool for family physicians, primary care providers and other health services researchers to use to understand the thoughts, beliefs and experiences of individuals. Despite the utility, semistructured interviews can be intimidating and challenging for researchers not familiar with qualitative approaches. In order to elucidate this method, we provide practical guidance for researchers, including novice researchers and those with few resources, to use semistructured interviewing as a data collection strategy. We provide recommendations for the essential steps to follow in order to best implement semistructured interviews in family medicine and primary care research settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Dementia (London)
                Dementia (London)
                spdem
                DEM
                Dementia (London, England)
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1471-3012
                1741-2684
                24 June 2023
                October 2023
                : 22
                : 7
                : 1461-1486
                Affiliations
                [1-14713012231185281]Community and Primary Care Research Group, Ringgold 6633, universityUniversity of Plymouth; , Plymouth, UK
                [2-14713012231185281]Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Ringgold 4919, universityUniversity College London; , London, UK
                [3-14713012231185281]Community and Primary Care Research Group, Ringgold 6633, universityUniversity of Plymouth; , Plymouth, UK
                [4-14713012231185281]Department of Health and Community Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Ringgold 3286, universityUniversity of Exeter; , Exeter, UK
                [5-14713012231185281]Community and Primary Care Research Group, Ringgold 6633, universityUniversity of Plymouth; , Plymouth, UK
                [6-14713012231185281]Medical Statistics, Faculty of Health, Ringgold 6633, universityUniversity of Plymouth; , Plymouth, UK
                [7-14713012231185281]Department of Rehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, universityFlinders University; , Adelaide, SA, Australia
                [8-14713012231185281]Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Ringgold 4905, universityLondon School of Economics and Political Science; , London, UK
                [9-14713012231185281]Community and Primary Care Research Group, Ringgold 6633, universityUniversity of Plymouth; , Plymouth, UK
                Author notes
                [*]Hannah Wheat, Community and Primary Care Research Group, University of Plymouth, Room N9, ITTC Building, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth PL6 8BX, UK. Email: Hannah.wheat-1@ 123456plymouth.ac.uk

                Data Availability Statement included at the end of the article

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3211-6254
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2652-3163
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8575-8819
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8735-2292
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4644-4603
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5226-9595
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4662-3193
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0482-3218
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5383-4362
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4964-5005
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4284-1081
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-9467
                Article
                10.1177_14713012231185281
                10.1177/14713012231185281
                10521162
                37354084
                b48725cd-ab65-49f2-a496-824ca8c58d5b
                © The Author(s) 2023

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts10

                remote interaction,dementia,personalised care and support,communication,thematic analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article