2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Standardization of zebrafish drug testing parameters for muscle diseases

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Skeletal muscular diseases predominantly affect skeletal and cardiac muscle, resulting in muscle weakness, impaired respiratory function and decreased lifespan. These harmful outcomes lead to poor health-related quality of life and carry a high healthcare economic burden. The absence of promising treatments and new therapies for muscular disorders requires new methods for candidate drug identification and advancement in animal models. Consequently, the rapid screening of drug compounds in an animal model that mimics features of human muscle disease is warranted. Zebrafish are a versatile model in preclinical studies that support developmental biology and drug discovery programs for novel chemical entities and repurposing of established drugs. Due to several advantages, there is an increasing number of applications of the zebrafish model for high-throughput drug screening for human disorders and developmental studies. Consequently, standardization of key drug screening parameters, such as animal husbandry protocols, drug compound administration and outcome measures, is paramount for the continued advancement of the model and field. Here, we seek to summarize and explore critical drug treatment and drug screening parameters in the zebrafish-based modeling of human muscle diseases. Through improved standardization and harmonization of drug screening parameters and protocols, we aim to promote more effective drug discovery programs.

          Abstract

          Summary: We propose a standardization of criteria for drug screening and evaluation in zebrafish muscle disease models, with the goal of improving experimental rigor, reproducibility and translation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references170

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome.

          Zebrafish have become a popular organism for the study of vertebrate gene function. The virtually transparent embryos of this species, and the ability to accelerate genetic studies by gene knockdown or overexpression, have led to the widespread use of zebrafish in the detailed investigation of vertebrate gene function and increasingly, the study of human genetic disease. However, for effective modelling of human genetic disease it is important to understand the extent to which zebrafish genes and gene structures are related to orthologous human genes. To examine this, we generated a high-quality sequence assembly of the zebrafish genome, made up of an overlapping set of completely sequenced large-insert clones that were ordered and oriented using a high-resolution high-density meiotic map. Detailed automatic and manual annotation provides evidence of more than 26,000 protein-coding genes, the largest gene set of any vertebrate so far sequenced. Comparison to the human reference genome shows that approximately 70% of human genes have at least one obvious zebrafish orthologue. In addition, the high quality of this genome assembly provides a clearer understanding of key genomic features such as a unique repeat content, a scarcity of pseudogenes, an enrichment of zebrafish-specific genes on chromosome 4 and chromosomal regions that influence sex determination.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish.

            We describe a series of stages for development of the embryo of the zebrafish, Danio (Brachydanio) rerio. We define seven broad periods of embryogenesis--the zygote, cleavage, blastula, gastrula, segmentation, pharyngula, and hatching periods. These divisions highlight the changing spectrum of major developmental processes that occur during the first 3 days after fertilization, and we review some of what is known about morphogenesis and other significant events that occur during each of the periods. Stages subdivide the periods. Stages are named, not numbered as in most other series, providing for flexibility and continued evolution of the staging series as we learn more about development in this species. The stages, and their names, are based on morphological features, generally readily identified by examination of the live embryo with the dissecting stereomicroscope. The descriptions also fully utilize the optical transparancy of the live embryo, which provides for visibility of even very deep structures when the embryo is examined with the compound microscope and Nomarski interference contrast illumination. Photomicrographs and composite camera lucida line drawings characterize the stages pictorially. Other figures chart the development of distinctive characters used as staging aid signposts.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates.

              Oral bioavailability measurements in rats for over 1100 drug candidates studied at SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals (now GlaxoSmithKline) have allowed us to analyze the relative importance of molecular properties considered to influence that drug property. Reduced molecular flexibility, as measured by the number of rotatable bonds, and low polar surface area or total hydrogen bond count (sum of donors and acceptors) are found to be important predictors of good oral bioavailability, independent of molecular weight. That on average both the number of rotatable bonds and polar surface area or hydrogen bond count tend to increase with molecular weight may in part explain the success of the molecular weight parameter in predicting oral bioavailability. The commonly applied molecular weight cutoff at 500 does not itself significantly separate compounds with poor oral bioavailability from those with acceptable values in this extensive data set. Our observations suggest that compounds which meet only the two criteria of (1) 10 or fewer rotatable bonds and (2) polar surface area equal to or less than 140 A(2) (or 12 or fewer H-bond donors and acceptors) will have a high probability of good oral bioavailability in the rat. Data sets for the artificial membrane permeation rate and for clearance in the rat were also examined. Reduced polar surface area correlates better with increased permeation rate than does lipophilicity (C log P), and increased rotatable bond count has a negative effect on the permeation rate. A threshold permeation rate is a prerequisite of oral bioavailability. The rotatable bond count does not correlate with the data examined here for the in vivo clearance rate in the rat.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Dis Model Mech
                Dis Model Mech
                DMM
                Disease Models & Mechanisms
                The Company of Biologists Ltd
                1754-8403
                1754-8411
                1 January 2024
                18 January 2024
                18 January 2024
                : 17
                : 1
                : dmm050339
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham and Children's of Alabama , Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
                [ 2 ]Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, University of Maine , Orono, ME 04469, USA
                [ 3 ]School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine , Orono, ME 04469, USA
                [ 4 ]Child Health Institute of New Jersey and Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Rutgers, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School , New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
                [ 5 ]Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine , Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
                [ 6 ]Department of Pediatrics, Section of Child Neurology, University of Colorado at Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, CO 80045, USA
                [ 7 ]Department of Anatomy and Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences , Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
                [ 8 ]Centre for Muscle Research , Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
                [ 9 ]Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute, Monash University , Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
                [ 10 ]EMBL Australia, Victorian Node, Monash University , Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
                [ 11 ]Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [ 12 ]Division of Neurology, The Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada
                [ 13 ]Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada
                [ 14 ]Program for Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A4, Canada
                [ 15 ]Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A4, Canada
                [ 16 ]Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute , Seattle, WA 98101, USA
                [ 17 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington , Seattle, WA 98195, USA
                [ 18 ]UAB Center for Exercise Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
                [ 19 ]Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
                [ 20 ]Civitan International Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
                [ 21 ]UAB Center for Neurodegeneration and Experimental Therapeutics (CNET), Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Authors for correspondence ( lmaves@ 123456uw.edu , matthewalexander@ 123456uabmc.edu )

                Competing interests

                The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0034-9950
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2757-5157
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7204-9231
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7175-1096
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9084-5098
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1012-0079
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8874-8862
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4057-8451
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3984-4169
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9798-790X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7406-5171
                Article
                DMM050339
                10.1242/dmm.050339
                10820820
                38235578
                b585e2c5-9785-41df-8f8c-0cd6b52d892d
                © 2024. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

                History
                : 3 June 2023
                : 6 December 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002;
                Funded by: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000069;
                Award ID: R01AR076978
                Award ID: R01AR078000
                Award ID: R01AR075836
                Award ID: R56AR077017
                Funded by: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009633;
                Award ID: R01HD095897
                Funded by: Office of the Director, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000179;
                Award ID: U54OD030167
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000054;
                Award ID: R01CA216108
                Funded by: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000065;
                Award ID: R01NS109149
                Funded by: Medical Research Future Fund;
                Award ID: 2015993
                Categories
                Special Article

                Molecular medicine
                zebrafish,drug discovery,standardization,drug screening parameters,drug library
                Molecular medicine
                zebrafish, drug discovery, standardization, drug screening parameters, drug library

                Comments

                Comment on this article